Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-8ls8l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-09-15T11:55:54.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Radical Representations to Corporeal Becomings: The Feminist Philosophy of Lloyd, Grosz, and Gatens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Claire Colebrook
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Contrasting the work of Genevieve Lloyd, Elizabeth Grosz, and Moira Gatens with the poststrueturalist philosophy of Judith Butler, this paper identifies a distinctive “Australian” feminism. It argues that while Butler remains trapped by the matter/representation binary, the Spinozist turn in Lloyd and Gatens, and Grosz's work on Bergson and Deleuze, are attempts to think corporeality.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 15 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Going Australian: Reconfiguring Feminism and Philosophy , Spring 2000 , pp. 76 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Braidotti, Rosi 1991. Patterns of dissonance: A study of women in contemporary philosophy. Trans. Guild, Elizabeth. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith 1993. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.” New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith 1997. The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford: Stanfotd University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques 1973. Difference. In Speech and phenomena and other essays on Husserl's theory of signs, Trans. Allison, David B.Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques 1982. Sending: On representation. Social Research (49) 2: 294–326.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques 1988. Limited Inc. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel 1972. The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. Trans. Sheridan Smith, A. M.New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Gatens, Moira 1991. Feminism and philosophy: Perspectives on difference and equality. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Gatens, Moira 1996. Imaginary bodies: Ethics, power and corporeality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gross, Elizabeth 1986. Irigaray and sexual difference. Australian Feminist Studies 2 (Autumn): 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth 1987. Notes towards a corporeal feminism. Australian Feminist Studies 5 (Summer): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth 1990. Jacques Lacan: A feminist introduction. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth 1994. Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth 1995. Space, time and perversion: The politics of bodies. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth 1999. Thinking the new: Of futures yet unthought. In Becomings: Explorations in time, memory and futures, ed. Grosz, Elizabeth. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth 2000. Deleuze's Bergson: Duration, the virtual and a politics of the future. In Deleuze and feminist theory, ed. Buchanan, Ian and Colebrook, Claire. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce 1985. Speculum of the other woman. Trans. Gill, Gillian C.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce 1996. I love to you: Sketch of a possible felicity in history. Trans. Martin, Alison. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve 1982. Woman as other: Sex, gender and subjectivity. Australian Feminist Studies 10 (Summer): 13–22.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve 1984. The man of reason: “Male”and “female” in western philosophy. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve 1993. Being in time: Selves and narrators in philosophy and literature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve 1996. Spinoza and the Ethics. London: Routledge Philosophy Guidebook.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich 1968. The will to power. Trans. Kaufmann, Walter and Hollingdale, R. J., ed. Kaufmann, Walter. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar