Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T21:46:34.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Epistemology of the South, Coloniality of Gender, and Latin American Feminism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2022

Breny Mendoza*
Affiliation:
Gender and Women's Studies, California State University, Northridge, 18111 Nordhoff Street, Northridge, CA 91330
Daniela Paredes Grijalva
Affiliation:
Institute for Social Anthropology, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Hollandstrasse 11-13, Vienna 1210, Austria Email: Daniela.paredes.grijalva@oeaw.ac.at
*
Corresponding author. Email: breny.mendoza@csun.edu

Abstract

This article provides a Latin American feminist critique of early decolonial theories focusing on the work of Aníbal Quijano and Enrique Dussel. Although decolonial theorists refer to Chicana feminist scholarship in their work, the work of Latin American feminists is ignored. However, the author argues that Chicana feminist theory cannot stand in for Latin American feminist theory because “lo latinoamericano” gets lost in translation. Latin American feminists must do their own theoretical work. Central to the critique of the use of gender in decolonial theory is an analysis of the social pacts among white capitalists and white working-class men that not only exclude white women but make citizenship and democracy impossible for men and women of color in the metropolis as well as in the colony. By revealing the nexus between gender, race, and democracy, not only is the coloniality of gender apparent, but also the coloniality of democracy.

Type
Feminism in Translation
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hypatia, a Nonprofit Corporation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article was first published as Breny Mendoza. 2010. La epistemología del sur, la colonialidad del género y el feminismo latinoamericano. In Aproximaciones críticas a las prácticas teórico-políticas del feminismo latinoamericano. Vol. 1. ed. Yuderkys Espinosa Miñoso. Buenos Aires: En la frontera.

References

Allen, Paula Gunn. 1986. The sacred hoop: recovering the feminine in Indian traditions. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
De Sousa Santos, Boaventura. 2008. El foro social mundial y la izquierda global. El Viejo Topo 240: 3962.Google Scholar
Dussel, Enrique. 2008. Twenty theses on politics. Durham, N.C., and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Escobar, Arturo. 2003. Mundos y conocimientos de otro modo. Tabula Rasa 1: 5186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espinosa Miñoso, Yuderkys, ed. 2010. Aproximaciones críticas a las prácticas teórico-políticas del feminismo latinoamericano, vol. 1. Buenos Aires: En la frontera.Google Scholar
Lugones, Maria. 2007. Heterosexualism and the colonial modern gender system. Hypatia 22 (1): 186219.Google Scholar
Mendoza, Breny. 2014. Crítica al debate contemporáneo sobre los imperios. In Ensayos de crítica feminista en nuestra América. Mexico City: Herder Editorial.Google Scholar
Oyèrónkẹ́, Oyěwùmí. 1997. The invention of women. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1988. The Sexual Contract. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Quijano, Anibal. 2008. Coloniality of power, Eurocentrism, and social classification. In Coloniality at large, ed. Moraña, Mabel, Dussel, Enrique, and Jáuregui, Carlos A.. Durham, N.C., and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Richard, Nelly. 2004. Intersecting Latin America with Latin Americanism: Academic knowledge, theoretical practice, and cultural criticism. In The Latin American cultural studies reader, ed. Ana del Sarto, Ríos, Alicia, and Trigo., Abril Durham, N.C., and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Roediger, David. 1991. The wages of whiteness: race and the making of the American working class. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sarah. 1989. Maternal thinking: toward a politics of peace. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Vuola, Elina. 2003. Option for the poor and the exclusion of women: The challenges of postmodernism and feminism to liberation theology. In Option for the margins: Theological and other challenges in postmodern and postcolonial worlds, ed. Rieger, Joerg. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar