Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Beyond Managing Research Partnerships: Partnered Research as an Integrated Methodological Approach

  • Silvia Bonaccio (a1), Catherine E. Connelly (a2), Sandra L. Fisher (a3), Ian R. Gellatly (a4), Monique A. M. Gignac (a5) and Arif Jetha (a5)...

Extract

Lapierre et al. (2018) provide a compelling set of reasons why conducting research in organizational settings should include investing time and energy to foster and promote enhanced relationships with organizational stakeholders. We agree that managing research partnerships carefully is paramount to creating the conditions necessary to implement rigorous methodology and collect the data needed to test theory-based hypotheses. However, we believe that Lapierre et al.’s argument should be taken further.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Silvia Bonaccio, Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. E-mail: bonaccio@telfer.uottawa.ca

Footnotes

Hide All

The authors wish to acknowledge a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (#895-2013-1021).

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). (2016). About knowledge translation. Retrieved from http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/29418.html
Cashman, S. B., Adeky, S., Allen III, A. J., Corburn, J., Israel, B. A., Montaño, J., Rafaelito, A., Rhodes, S.D., Swanston, S., Wallerstein, N., & Eng, E. (2008). The power and the promise: Working with communities to analyze data, interpret findings, and get to outcomes. American Journal of Public Health, 98 (8), 14071417. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2007.113571
Guzzo, R., Fink, A., King, E., Tonidandel, S., & Landis, R. (2015). Big data recommendations for industrial–organizational psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8 (4), 491508. doi:10.1017/iop.2015.40
Institute for Work and Health. (n.d.). What researchers mean by. Retrieved from http://www.iwh.on.ca/what-researchers-mean-by
Kidd, S., Davidson, L., Frederick, T., & Kral, M. J. (2018). Reflecting on participatory, action-oriented research methods in community psychology: Progress, problems, and paths forward. American Journal of Community Psychology, 61 (1–2), 7687. doi:10.1002/ajcp.12214
Lapierre, L. M., Matthews, R. A., Eby, L. T., Truxillo, D. M., Johnson, R.E., & Major, D. A. (2018). Recommended practices for academics to initiate and manage research partnerships. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 11 (4), 543581.
Nicolaidis, C., Raymaker, D., McDonald, K., Dern, S., Ashkenazy, E., Boisclair, C., Robertson, C., & Baggs, A. (2011). Collaboration strategies in nontraditional community-based participatory research partnerships: Lessons from an academic–community partnership with autistic self-advocates. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 5 (2), 143. doi:10.1353/cpr.2011.0022
O'Toole, T.P., Aaron, K. F., Chin, M. H., Horowitz, C., & Tyson, F. (2003). Community-based participatory research: Opportunities, challenges, and the need for a common language. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 18 (7), 592594. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.30416.x
Pratt, M. G., & Bonaccio, S. (2016). Qualitative research in I-O psychology: Maps, myths, and moving forward. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9 (4), 693715. doi:10.1017/iop.2016.92
Ross, L. F., Loup, A., Nelson, R. M., Botkin, J. R., Kost, R., Smith, G. R. Jr., & Gehlert, S. (2010). The challenges of collaboration for academic and community partners in a research partnership: Points to consider. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5 (1), 1931. doi:10.1525/jer.2010.5.1.19
Selby, J. V., & Slutsky, J.R. (2014). Practicing partnered research. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 29 (Suppl 4), S814–816. doi:10.1007/s11606-014-3046-z
SIOP. (2018). Government relations. Retrieved from http://www.siop.org/Advocacy/
Van Eerd, D., & Saunders, R. (2017). Integrated knowledge transfer and exchange: An organizational approach for stakeholder engagement and communications. Scholarly and Research Communication, 8 (1). http://doi.org/10.22230/src.2017v8n1a274

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed