Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Gender Stereotypes Are Alive, Well, and Busy Producing Workplace Discrimination

  • Madeline E. Heilman (a1) and Alice H. Eagly (a2)

Abstract

  • An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided below. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Copyright

Corresponding author

E-mail: madeline.heilman@nyu.edu, Address: Department of Psychology, New York University, 6 Washington Pl Room 576, New York, NY 10003

References

Hide All
Davison, H. K., & Burke, M. J. (2000). Sex discrimination in simulated employment contexts: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 225248.
Dipboye, R. L. (1985). Some neglected variables in research on discrimination in appraisals. Academy of Management Review, 10, 116127.
Dovidio, J. F., Glick, P., & Rudman, L. (Eds.). (2005). On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573598.
Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125145.
Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 322.
Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1994). Are people prejudiced against women? Some answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes, and judgments of competence. In Stroebe, W. & Hewstone, M. (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 135). New York: Wiley.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2007). Sex discrimination: The psychological approach. In Crosby, F. J., Stockdale, M. S., & Ropp, S. A. (Eds.), Sex discrimination in the workplace: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 155187). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Goldin, C., & Rouse, C. (2000). Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. American Economic Review, 90, 715741.
Heilman, M. E. (1983). Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 269298.
Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657674.
Heilman, M. E., & Haynes, M. C. (2008). Subjectivity in the appraisal process: A facilitator of gender bias in work settings. In Borgida, E. & Fiske, S. T. (Eds.), Beyond common sense: Psychological science in the courtroom (pp. 127155). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Heilman, M. E., & Parks-Stamm, E. J. (2007). Gender stereotypes in the workplace: Obstacles to women’s career progress. In Correll, S. J. (Ed.), Social psychology of gender: Advances in group processes (Vol. 24, pp. 4777). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Kunda, Z., & Spencer, S. J. (2003). When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 522544.
Landy, F. J. (2008). Stereotypes, bias, and personnel decisions: Strange and stranger. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 379392.
Lyness, K. S., & Heilman, M. E. (2006). When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 777785.
Pager, D. (2007). The use of field experiments for studies of employment discrimination: Contributions, critiques, and directions for the future. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 609, 104133.
Riach, P. A., & Rich, J. (2002). Field experiments of discrimination in the market place. Economic Journal, 112, F480F518.
Schein, V. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women’s progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 675688.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Gender Stereotypes Are Alive, Well, and Busy Producing Workplace Discrimination

  • Madeline E. Heilman (a1) and Alice H. Eagly (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.