No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Licensure Issue in I-O Psychology: Are We Trying to Police the Police?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 June 2017
Extract
Many industrial and organizational (I-O) and consulting psychologists who engage in practice of their profession, for example as “management consultants,” compete against consultants with a wide array of backgrounds and disciplinary degrees. Indeed, in consulting work, one of us has competed against practitioners with backgrounds in fields ranging from accounting (CPAs) to sociology, communication, anthropology, business administration, and even those with degrees in divinity.
- Type
- Commentaries
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2017
References
American Psychological Association. (2002). American Psychological Association ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code2002.html
Google Scholar
Baldick, Theodore L. (1980). Ethical discrimination ability of intern psychologists: A function of training in ethics. Professional Psychology, 11
(2), 276–282. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.11.2.276
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belmont Report. (1979).
Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research
. Retrieved from https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/index.html.Google Scholar
Hegarty, W. H., and Sims, H. P. Jr. (1979). Organizational philosophy, policies, and objectives related to unethical decision behavior: A laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 331–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Licensure of Consulting and I-O Psychologists (LCIOP) Joint Task Force. (2017). The licensure issue in consulting and I-O psychology: A discussion paper. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 10
(2), 144–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowman, R.L. (Ed.). (2006). The ethical practice of psychology in organizations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar