Skip to main content
×
Home

On Teams: Unifying Themes and the Way Ahead

  • Scott I. Tannenbaum (a1), John E. Mathieu (a2), Eduardo Salas (a3) and Debra Cohen (a4)
Abstract

The commentaries to our focal article were both interesting and stimulating. As we generally agreed with the major points raised in the commentaries, we use this response to frame an on-going tension point or challenge regarding team definitions, highlight a few unifying themes that weave through our initial article and the commentaries, and discuss the transition from research to informed practice. The past few decades have been exciting times for team researchers and practitioners, and the time is ripe for new energies and approaches.

Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: scott.tannenbaum@groupoe.com, Address: Group for Organizational Effectiveness, Inc., 727 Waldens Pond Road, Albany, NY 12203
References
Hide All
Bell B. S., & Kozlowski S. W. J. (2012). Three conceptual themes for future research on teams. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 4548.
Bell S. T., & Fisher D. M. (2012). Does dynamic composition mean the demise of shared team properties and the rise of global team properties? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 3941.
Cartwright D., & Zander A. (1953). Group dynamics. London, UK: Tavistock.
DeCostanza A. H., DiRosa G. A., Rogers S. E., Slaughter A. J., & Estrada A. X. (2012). Researching teams: Nothing's going to change our world. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 3639.
Hackman J. R. (2003). Learning more by crossing levels: Evidence from airplanes, hospitals, and orchestras. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 905922.
Keeton K. E., Slack K. J., Schmidt L. L., & Malka A. A. (2012). The rocket science of teams. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 3235.
Klein C. (2012). Research will evolve, but we must do a better job of translating what we already know. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 5255.
Klimoski R. (2012). Context matters. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 2832.
Mathieu J. E., Marks M. A., & Zaccaro S. J. (2001). Multi-team systems. In Anderson N., Ones D., Sinangil H. K., & Viswesvaran C. (Eds.), International handbook of work and organizational psychology (pp. 289313). London, UK: Sage.
Mathieu J. E., Maynard M. T., Rapp T. L., & Gilson L. L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410476.
Murase T., Doty D., Wax A., DeChurch L. A., & Contractor N. (2012). Teams are changing: Time to “think networks.” Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 4144.
Salas E., Wilson K. A., Sims D. E., Burke C. S., & Priest H. A. (2007). Teamwork training for patient safety: Best practices and guiding principles. In Carayon P. (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and patient safety (pp. 803822). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shaw M. E. (1964). Communication networks. In Berkowitz L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 111147). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Wageman R., Gardner H., & Mortensen M. (2012). Team have changed: Catching up to the future. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 4852.
West M. A., & Lyubovnikova J. (2012). Real teams or pseudo teams? The changing landscape needs a better map. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 2528.
Zaccaro S., Marks M., & DeChurch L. (2011). Multiteam systems: An organizational form for dynamic and complex environments. New York, NY: Routledge.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • ISSN: 1754-9426
  • EISSN: 1754-9434
  • URL: /core/journals/industrial-and-organizational-psychology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 96 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 57 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.