Skip to main content
×
Home

Teams Are Changing: Are Research and Practice Evolving Fast Enough?

  • Scott I. Tannenbaum (a1), John E. Mathieu (a2), Eduardo Salas (a3) and Debra Cohen (a4)
Abstract

In the past, there was a fairly strong alignment between what teams experienced, the topics that team researchers were studying, and the practices that organizations used to manage their teams. However, the nature of teams and the environment in which they operate has changed, and as a result, new needs have emerged. Although there have been some innovative advancements, research and practice have not always adjusted to remain aligned with emerging needs. We highlight 3 significant change themes that are affecting teams: (a) dynamic composition, (b) technology and distance, and (c) empowerment and delayering. For each theme, we share our observations, review the related science and identify future research needs, and specify challenges and recommendations for employing effective team-based practices in applied settings. We conclude with thoughts about the future and suggest that new theories, research methods, and analyses may be needed to study the new team dynamics.

Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: scott.tannenbaum@groupoe.com, Address: Group for Organizational Effectiveness, Inc., 727 Waldens Pond Road, Albany, NY 12203.
References
Hide All
Ancona D. G., & Caldwell D. F. (1998). Rethinking team composition from the outside in. In Neale M. A., Mannix E. A., & Gruenfeld D. H. (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (Vol. 1, pp. 2138). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Armstrong D., & Cole P. (2002). Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. In Hinds P. & Kiesler S. (Eds.), New ways of working across distance using technology (pp. 167189). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Arrow H. (1997). Stability, bistability, and instability in small group influence patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 7585.
Arrow H., & Crosson S. (2003). Musical chairs— Membership dynamics in self-organized group formation. Small Group Research, 34, 523556.
Arrow H., & McGrath J. E. (1995). Membership dynamics in groups at work—A theoretical framework. Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews, 17, 373411.
Balkundi P., Kilduff M., Barsness Z. I., & Michael J. H. (2007). Demographic antecedents and performance consequences of structural holes in work teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 241260.
Baltes B. B., Dickson M. W., Sherman M. P., Bauer C. C., & LaGanke J. S. (2002). Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 156179.
Bandura A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
Borgatti S. P., & Foster P. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29, 9911013.
Burke C. S., Salas E., Estep S., & Pierce L. (2007). Facilitating team adaptation “in the wild”: A theoretical framework, instructional strategies, and research agenda. In Hoffman R. (Ed.), Expertise out of context (pp. 507524). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
Burnes B. (2007). Kurt Lewin and the Harwood studies: The foundations of OD. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43, 213231.
Campion M. A., Medsker G. J., & Higgs A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823850.
Cannon-Bowers J. A., Tannenbaum S. I., Salas E., & Volpe C. E. (1995). Defining team competencies and establishing team training requirements. In Guzzo R. & Salas E. (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Carley K. M. (2003). Dynamic network analysis. In Breiger R., Carley K., & Pattison P. (Eds.), Dynamic social network modeling and analysis (pp. 133145). Washington, D.C.: National Research Council.
Cascio W. F. (2000). Managing a virtual workplace. Academy of Management Executive, 14, 8190.
Chafkin M. (2010, April 1). The case, and the plan, for the virtual company. INC., 6273.
Contractor N. (2009). The emergence of multidimensional networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 743747.
Contractor N., Wasserman S., & Faust K. (2006). Testing multi-theoretical multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytic framework and empirical example. Academy of Management Review, 31, 681703.
Cummings J., & Pletcher C. (2011). Why project networks beat project teams. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52, 7580.
Cummings J. N. (2007, July). Membership intensity and the performance of geographically dispersed teams. Paper presented at the 2nd annual ING Conference, Lansing, Michigan.
Daft R. L., & Lengel R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 191233.
DeSanctis G., & Poole M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use—Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5, 121147.
DeSanctis G., Poole M. S., & Dickson G. W. (2000). Teams and technology: Interactions over time. In Neale M. A., Mannix E. A., & Griffith T. L. (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (pp. 127). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
Drach-Zahavy A. (2011). Interorganizational teams as boundary spanners: The role of team diversity, boundedness, and extrateam links. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 89118.
Ellis A. P. J., Hollenbeck J. R., Ilgen D. R., Porter C., West B. J., & Moon H. (2003). Team learning: Collectively connecting the dots. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 821835.
Espinosa J. A., Cummings J. N., Wilson J. M., & Pearce B. M. (2003). Team boundary issues across multiple global firms. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 157190.
Fong T., Thorpe C., & Baur C. (2003). Collaboration, dialog, and human-robot interaction. Robotics Research, 6, 255266.
Gaston M., & DesJardins M. (2008). The effect of network structure on dynamic team formation in multi-agent systems. Computational Intelligence, 24, 122157.
Gevers J. M. P., van Eerde W., & Rutte C. G. (2009). Team self-regulation and meeting deadlines in project teams: Antecedents and effects of temporal consensus. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18, 295321.
Gonzalez V., & Mark G. (2004, April). Constant, constant, multi-tasking craziness: Managing multiple working spheres. Paper presented at the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York.
Green S. A., Billinghurst M., Chen X., & Chase J. G. (2008). Human-robot collaboration: A literature review and augmented reality approach in design. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 5, 118.
Hackman J. R., & Oldman G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Harmati I., & Skrzypczyk K. (2009). Robot team coordination for target tracking using fuzzy logic controller in game theoretic framework. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 57, 7586.
Harrison D. A., & Humphrey S. E. (2010). Designing for diversity or diversity for design? Tasks, interdependence, and within-unit differences at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 328337.
Harrison D. A., Mohammed S., McGrath J. E., Florey A. T., & Vanderstoep S. W. (2003). Time matters in team performance: Effects of member familiarity, entrainment, and task discontinuity on speed and quality. Personnel Psychology, 56, 633669.
Hempel P. S., Zhang Z. X., & Han Y. E. (in press). Team empowerment and the organizational context: Decentralization and the contrasting effects of formalization. Journal of Management.
Hill W. F., & Gruner L. (1973). A study of development in open and closed groups. Small Group Research, 4, 355381.
Hirst G. (2009). Effects of membership change on open discussion and team performance: The moderating role of team tenure. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18, 231249.
Jarvenpaa S. L., Knoll K., & Leidner D. E. (1998). Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 2964.
Jarvenpaa S. L., Rao V. S., & Huber G. P. (1988). Computer support for meetings of groups working on unstructured problems: A field experiment. MIS Quarterly, 12, 645666.
Kim P. H. (1997). When what you know can hurt you: A study of experiential effects on group discussion and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 165177.
Kirkman B. L., & Mathieu J. E. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31, 700718.
Kirkman B. L., Mathieu J. E., Cordery J. L., Kukenberger M. R., & Rosen B. (2011). Managing a new collaborative entity in business organizations: Understanding organizational communities of practice effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 12341245.
Kirkman B. L., & Rosen B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 5874.
Klein C., DiazGranados D., Salas E., Le H., Burke C. S., Lyons R., Goodwin G. F. (2009). Does team building work? Small Group Research, 40, 181222.
Kozlowski S. W. J., & Bell B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In Borman W., Ilgen D. & Klimoski R. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology, Vol. 12: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 333375). New York, NY: Wiley.
Lewis K. (2004). Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Science, 50, 15191533.
Lewis K., Belliveau M., Herndon B., & Keller J. (2007). Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 159178.
Lipnack J., & Stamps J. (1997). Virtual teams: Reaching across space, time and organizations with technology. New York, NY: Wiley.
Littlepage G., Robison W., & Reddington K. (1997). Effects of task experience and group experience on group performance, member ability, and recognition of expertise. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 133147.
Majchrzak A., Rice R. E., Malhotra A., King N., & Ba S. L. (2000). Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quarterly, 24, 569600.
Marks M. L., & De Meuse K. P. (2003). The realities of resizing. In Marks M. L. & Meuse K. P. D. (Eds.), Resizing the organization: Managing layoffs, divestitures, and closings (pp. 138). San Franciso, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Marrone J. A. (2010). Team boundary spanning: A multilevel review of past research and proposals for the future. Journal of Management, 36, 911940.
Martins L. L., Gilson L. L., & Maynard M. T. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 805835.
Mathieu J. E., Marks M. A., & Zaccaro S. J. (2001). Multi-team systems. In Anderson N., Ones D., Sinangil H. K., & Viswesvaran C. (Eds.), International handbook of work and organizational psychology (pp. 289313). London, UK: Sage Publications.
Mathieu J. E., Maynard M. T., Rapp T. L., & Gilson L. L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410476.
Maynard T., Mathieu J. E., Gilson L., & Rapp T. (in press). Something(s) old and something(s) new: Modeling drivers of global virtual team effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behavior.
Mohammed S., Ferzandi L., & Hamilton K. (2010). Metaphor no more: A 15-year review of the team mental model. Journal of Management, 36, 876910.
Mohrman S. A., Cohen S. G., & Mohrman A. M. Jr. (1995). Designing team-based organizations: New forms of knowledge work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Mortensen M., Woolley A. W., & O’Leary M. B. (2007). Conditions enabling effective multiple team membership. In Crowston K., Sieber S., & Wynn E. (Eds.), Virtuality and virtualization (Vol. 236, pp. 215228). Portland, OR: Springer.
O’Leary M. B., & Cummings J. N. (2007). The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams. Management Information Science Quarterly, 31, 433452.
O’Leary M., Mortensen M., & Woolley A. (2011). Multiple team membership: A theoretical model of its effects on productivity and learning for individuals and teams. Academy of Management Review, 36, 461478.
Robert L. P., Dennis A. R., & Hung Y. T. C. (2009). Individual swift trust and knowledge-based trust in face-to-face and virtual team members. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26, 241279.
Rousseau D. M., Sitkin S. B., Burt R. S., & Camerer C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393404.
Salas E., Burke C. S., & Fowlkes J. E. (2006). Measuring team performance “in the wild”: Challenges and tips. In Bennett W., Lance C., & Woehr D. (Eds.), Performance measurement: Current perspectives and future challenges (pp. 245272). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Salas E., Dickinson T. L., Converse S. A., & Tannenbaum S. I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In Swezey R. W. & Salas E. (Ed.), Teams: Their training and performance (Vols. 3–29). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Seibert S., Wang G., & Courtright S. H. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analysis review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 9811003.
Shah J., & Breazeal C. (2010). An empirical analysis of team coordination behaviors and action planning with application to human-robot teaming. Human Factors, 52, 234245.
Silver S., Randolph W. A., & Seibert S. (2006). Implementing and sustaining empowerment: Lessons learned from comparison of a for-profit and a nonprofit organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15, 4758.
Smith-Jentsch K. A., Cannon-Bowers J. A., Tannenbaum S. I., & Salas E. (2008). Guided team self-correction: Impacts on team mental models, processes, and effectiveness. Journal of Small Group Research, 39, 303327.
Straus S. (1997). Technology, group process, and group outcomes: Testing the connections in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 227266.
Subramony M. (2009). A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between HRM bundles and firm performance. Human Resource Management, 48, 745768.
Sundstrom E. (1999). The challenges of supporting work team effectiveness. In Sundstrom E. (Ed.), Supporting work team effectiveness (pp. 323). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Tannenbaum S. I., Beard R. L., McNall L. A., & Salas E. (2010). Informal learning and development in organizations. In Kozlowski S. W. J. & Salas E. (Eds.), Learning, training, and development in organizations (pp. 303332). New York, NY: Routledge.
Trist E. L., Higgin G. W., Murray H., & Pollack A. B. (1963). Organizational choice. London, UK: Tavistock.
Tversky B., Lee P., & Mainwaring S. (1999). Why do speakers mix perspectives? Spatial Cognition Computing, 1, 399412.
Wallace J. C., Johnson P. D., Mathe K., & Paul J. (2011). Structural and psychological empowerment climates, performance, and the moderating role of shared felt accountability: A managerial perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 840850.
Walther J. B. (2002). Time effects in computer-mediated groups: Past, present, and future. In Hinds P. J. & Kiesler S. (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 235257). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Webber S. S., & Klimoski R. J. (2004). Crews: A distinct type of work team. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18, 261279.
Wildman J., Thayer A., Rosen M., Salas E., Mathieu J. E., & Rayne S. (in press). Task types and team-level attributes: Synthesis of team classification literature. Human Resource Development Review.
Xi Y., & Tang F. (2004). Multiplex multi-core pattern of network organizations: An exploratory study. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 10, 179195.
Yin R. (1993). Applications of case study research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Zaccaro S., Marks M., & DeChurch L. (2011). Multiteam systems: An organizational form for dynamic and complex environments. New York, NY: Routledge Academic
Zigurs I., & Khazanchi D. (2008). From profiles to patterns: A new view of task-technology fit. Information Systems Management, 25, 813.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • ISSN: 1754-9426
  • EISSN: 1754-9434
  • URL: /core/journals/industrial-and-organizational-psychology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 333 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 439 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.