Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-ffbbcc459-llqpl Total loading time: 0.675 Render date: 2022-03-03T02:00:03.383Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Excess Costs and Utilization Associated with Methicillin Resistance for Patients with Staphylococcus aureus Infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Gregory A. Filice*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minnesota Infectious Disease Section, Medical Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minnesota
John A. Nyman
Affiliation:
Division of Health Services Research and Policy, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis
Catherine Lexau
Affiliation:
Minnesota Department of Health, Saint Paul, Minnesota
Christine H. Lees
Affiliation:
Minnesota Department of Health, Saint Paul, Minnesota
Lindsay A. Bockstedt
Affiliation:
Division of Health Services Research and Policy, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis
Kathryn Como-Sabetti
Affiliation:
Minnesota Department of Health, Saint Paul, Minnesota
Lindsey J. Lesher
Affiliation:
Minnesota Department of Health, Saint Paul, Minnesota
Ruth Lynfield
Affiliation:
Minnesota Department of Health, Saint Paul, Minnesota
*
Infectious Disease Section (111F), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 1 Veterans Drive, Minneapolis, MN 55417 (filic001@umn.edu)

Abstract

Objective.

To determine differences in healthcare costs between cases of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infection and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infection in adults.

Design.

Retrospective study of all cases of S. aureus infection.

Setting.

Department of Veterans Affairs hospital and associated clinics.

Patients.

There were 390 patients with MSSA infections and 335 patients with MRSA infections.

Methods.

We used medical records, accounting systems, and interviews to identify services rendered and costs for Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center patients with S. aureus infection with onset during the period from January 1, 2004, through June 30, 2006. We used regression analysis to adjust for patient characteristics.

Results.

Median 6-month unadjusted costs for patients infected with MRSA were $34,657, compared with $15,923 for patients infected with MSSA. Patients with MRSA infection had more comorbidities than patients with MSSA infection (mean Charlson index 4.3 vs 3.2; P < .001). For patients with Charlson indices of 3 or less, mean adjusted 6-month costs derived from multivariate analysis were $51,252 (95% CI, $46,041–$56,464) for MRSA infection and $30,158 (95% CI, $27,092–$33,225) for MSSA infection. For patients with Charlson indices of 4 or more, mean adjusted costs were $84,436 (95% CI, $79,843–$89,029) for MRSA infection and $59,245 (95% CI, $56,016–$62,473) for MSSA infection. Patients with MRSA infection were also more likely to die than were patients with MSSA infection (23.6% vs 11.5%; P < .001). MRSA infection was more likely to involve the lungs, bloodstream, and urinary tract, while MSSA infection was more likely to involve bones or joints; eyes, ears, nose, or throat; surgical sites; and skin or soft tissue (P < .001).

Conclusions.

Resistance to methicillin in S. aureus was independently associated with increased costs. Effective antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention programs are needed to prevent these costly infections.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Barber, M. Methicillin-resistant staphylococci. J Clin Pathol 1961;14:385393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control 2004;32:470485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Hota, B, Ellenbogen, C, Hayden, MK, Aroutcheva, A, Rice, TW, Weinstein, RA. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infections at a public hospital: do public housing and incarceration amplify transmission? Arch Intern Med 2007;167:10261033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Popovich, KJ, Weinstein, RA, Hota, B. Are community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains replacing traditional nosocomial MRSA strains? Clin Infect Dis 2008;46:787794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Klein, E, Smith, DL, Laxminarayan, R. Hospitalizations and deaths caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, United States, 1999-2005. Emerg Infect Dis 2007;13:18401846.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Fridkin, SK, Hageman, JC, Morrison, M, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus disease in three communities. N Engl J Med 2005;352: 14361444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Cosgrove, SE, Carmeli, Y. The impact of antimicrobial resistance on health and economic outcomes. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:14331437.Google ScholarPubMed
8. Rubin, RJ, Harrington, CA, Poon, A, Dietrich, K, Greene, JA, Moiduddin, A. The economic impact of Staphylococcus aureus infection in New York City hospitals. Emerg Infect Dis 1999;5:917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Engemann, JJ, Carmeli, Y, Cosgrove, SE, et al. Adverse clinical and economic outcomes attributable to methicillin resistance among patients with Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36: 592598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Kim, T, Oh, PI, Simor, AE. The economic impact of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Canadian hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:99104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. McHugh, CG, Riley, LW. Risk factors and costs associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004;25:425430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Shorr, AF, Tabak, YP, Gupta, V, Johannes, RS, Liu, LZ, Kollef, MH. Morbidity and cost burden of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in early onset ventilator-associated pneumonia. Crir Care 2006;10:R97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Cosgrove, SE, Qi, Y, Kaye, KS, Harbarth, S, Karchmer, AW, Carmeli, Y. The impact of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia on patient outcomes: mortality, length of stay, and hospital charges. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005;26:166174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Lodise, TP, McKinnon, PS. Clinical and economic impact of methicillin resistance in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2005;52:113122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Reed, SD, Friedman, JY, Engemann, JJ, et al. Costs and outcomes among hemodialysis-dependent patients with methicillin-resistant or methicil-lin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005;26:175183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Department of Veterans Affairs. VHA Decision Support System (DSS)—Introduction. 2008. http://www.virec.research.va.gov/DataSourcesName/DSS/DSSintro.htm. Accessed March 6, 2009.Google Scholar
17. Barnett, PG. Determination of VA health care costs. Med Care Res Rev 2003;60(Suppl 3):124S141S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Horan, TC, Gaynes, RP. Surveillance of nosocomial infections. In: Mayhall, CG, ed. Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2004.Google Scholar
19. NCCLS. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Wayne, PA: NCCLS; 2002.Google ScholarPubMed
20. Department of Veterans Affairs. Veterans Health Information Systems and Technology Architecture (VistA)—description. Washington, DC: Department of Veterans Affairs. http://www.virec.research.va.gov/DataSourcesName/VISTA/VistA.htm. Accessed March 6, 2009.Google Scholar
21. Health Economics Resource Center. General cost-effectiveness analysis issues—how do I adjust for the effects of inflation? Washington, DC: Department of Veterans Affairs; 2008. http://www.herc.research.va.gov/resources/faq_a03.asp. Accessed March 27, 2009.Google Scholar
22. Manning, WG, Mullahy, J. Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform? J Health Econ 2001;20:461494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Charlson, ME, Pompei, P, Ales, KL, MacKenzie, CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Duan, N. Smearing estimate: a nonparametric retransformation method. J Am Stat Assoc 1983;78:605610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Manning, WG. The logged dependent variable, heteroscedasticity, and the retransformation problem. J Health Econ 1998;17:283295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Greene, WH. Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2003.Google Scholar
27. Gould, IM. Costs of hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and its control. Int I Antimicrob Agents 2006;28:379384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Chu, VH, Crosslin, DR, Friedman, JY, et al. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in patients with prosthetic devices: costs and outcomes. Am J Med 2005;118:1416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Shorr, AF. Epidemiology of staphylococcal resistance. Clin Infect Dis 2007;45(Suppl 3):S171S176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30. Noskin, GA, Rubin, RJ, Schentag, JJ, et al. The burden of Staphylococcus aureus infections on hospitals in the United States: an analysis of the 2000 and 2001 Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:17561761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Kanerva, M, Blom, M, Tuominen, U, et al. Costs of an outbreak of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . J Hosp Infect 2007;66:2228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Herr, CE, Heckrodt, TH, Hofmann, FA, Schnettler, R, Eikmann, TF. Additional costs for preventing the spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and a strategy for reducing these costs on a surgical ward. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:673678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Huang, SS, Yokoe, DS, Hinrichsen, VL, et al. Impact of routine intensive care unit surveillance cultures and resultant barrier precautions on hospital-wide methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 2006;43:971978.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34. Burton, DC, Edwards, JR, Horan, TC, Jernigan, JA, Fridkin, SK. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus central line-associated bloodstream infections in US intensive care units, 1997-2007. JAMA 2009;301:727736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35. Dellit, TH, Owens, RC, McGowan, JE Jr, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America guidelines for developing an institutional program to enhance antimicrobial stewardship. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44:159177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. McQuillen, DP, Petrak, RM, Wasserman, RB, Nahass, RG, Scull, JA, Martinelli, LP. The value of infectious diseases specialists: non-patient care activities. Clin Infect Dis 2008;47:10511063.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
111
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Excess Costs and Utilization Associated with Methicillin Resistance for Patients with Staphylococcus aureus Infection
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Excess Costs and Utilization Associated with Methicillin Resistance for Patients with Staphylococcus aureus Infection
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Excess Costs and Utilization Associated with Methicillin Resistance for Patients with Staphylococcus aureus Infection
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *