Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-ffbbcc459-2657c Total loading time: 0.218 Render date: 2022-03-03T01:59:56.023Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Nosocomial Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Is It Any Worse Than Nosocomial Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Linda A. Selvey
Affiliation:
Communicable Diseases Branch, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia
Michael Whitby*
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
Barbara Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
*
Department of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Rd, Brisbane 4102, Australia

Abstract

Objective:

To determine the comparative virulence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive S aureus (MSSA) by consideration of predisposing factors and outcomes in patients infected with these organisms in the healthcare setting.

Design:

Analysis of an historical cohort of 504 bacteremic patients (316 MSSA and 188 MRSA), examining factors associated with mortality.

Setting:

A 916-bed, university-affiliated, tertiary referral hospital.

Results:

Risk factors for the development of MRSA include male gender, admission due to trauma, immunosuppression, presence of a central vascular line or an indwelling urinary catheter, and a past history of MRSA infection. Overall mortality was 22%. Death due to bacteremia was significantly greater in the MRSA group (risk ratio, 1.68; P<.05), although these patients were not found to be more likely to die due to underlying disease during treatment of bacteremia. In those patients who recovered from bacteremia, no significant differences for the outcome of death could be determined between the MRSA and MSSA groups.

Conclusions:

There is a general consensus in the published literature that MRSA bacteremia is more likely to be associated with death, and we confirm this conclusion. However, in contrast to other studies, our MRSA cohort does not appear to be more at risk of death due to underlying disease during treatment for bacteremia. Similarly, the general consensus that MRSA patients have an increased overall mortality was not confirmed in our study. Differences in comorbidities of patients may provide some explanation of these conflicting results, while an alternate explanation is that MRSA strains are more virulent than MSSA in some centers. Perhaps the most plausible explanation is that treatment is provided earlier and in a more aggressive fashion in some centers, leading to an overall lower mortality rate in all staphylococcal bacteremias in these institutions.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Collopy, BT, Dalton, MF, Wright, TC, Mullany, C. Comparison of the clinical significance of methicillin resistant and methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus isolations. Med J Aus 1984;140:211214.Google ScholarPubMed
2. Mylotte, JM, McDermott, TC, Spooner, JA. Prospective study of 114 consecutive episodes of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Rev Infect Dis 1987;9:891907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Crossley, K, Loesch, D, Landesam, B, Mead, K, Chern, M, Strate, R. An outbreak of infections caused by strains of Staphylococcus aureus resistant to methicillin and aminoglycosides, I: clinical studies. J Infect Dis 1979;139:273279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Sorrell, TC, Packham, Dr, Shanker, S, Foldes, M, Munro, R. Vancomycin therapy for methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Ann Intern Med 1982;97:344350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. French, GL, Cheng, AFB, Ling, JML, Mo, P, Donn, INS. Hong Kong strains of methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus have similar virulence. J Hosp Infect 1990;15:117125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Romero-Vivas, J, Rubio, M, Fernandez, C, Picazo, JJ. Mortality associated with nosocomial bacteremia due to methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Clin Infect Dis 1995;21:14171423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Conterno, LO, Wey, SB, Castello, A. Risk factors for mortality in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:3237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Soriano, A, Martinez, JA, Mensa, J, Marco, F, Almel, AM, Moreno-Martinez, A, et al. Pathogenic significance of methicillin resistance for patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 2000;30:368373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Topeli, A, Unal, S, Akalin, HE. Risk factors influencing clinical outcome in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in a University Hospital. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2000;14:5763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Quarles, LD, Rutsky, EA, Rostand, SG. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in patients on chronic hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 1985;6:412419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
79
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Nosocomial Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Is It Any Worse Than Nosocomial Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia?
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Nosocomial Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Is It Any Worse Than Nosocomial Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia?
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Nosocomial Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Is It Any Worse Than Nosocomial Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia?
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *