Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-ffbbcc459-l9rg9 Total loading time: 0.338 Render date: 2022-03-02T22:29:48.900Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Preventing Nosocomial Transmission of Pulmonary Tuberculosis: When may Isolation be Discontinued for Patients with Suspected Tuberculosis?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Anwer H. Siddiqui
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine and the VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, Maryland
Trish M. Perl
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
Martha Conlon
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
Nancy Donegan
Affiliation:
Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC
Mary-Claire Roghmann*
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine and the VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, Maryland
*
Division of Hospital Epidemiology, VA Maryland Health Care System, 10 N. Greene Street (BT-111), Baltimore, MD 21201

Abstract

Objective:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Thoracic Society recommend obtaining cultures of at least three sputum specimens for acid-fast bacilli (AFB) from patients in whom tuberculosis (TB) is suspected. On the basis of this, most hospitals isolate patients with suspected TB for 3 days or more until three smear (not culture) results are negative. Our objective was to evaluate the predictive value and sensitivity of these smears.

Design:

Observational study.

Setting:

Four urban medical centers.

Methods:

The posttest probability of TB given sequential negative AFB smears from 274 patients isolated for suspected TB and the sensitivity of sequential AFB smears from 209 patients with positive results on culture for pulmonary TB were measured.

Results:

The posttest probabilities of having TB given one, two, and three negative AFB smears were low: 1.1% (3 of 265; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 0.23% to 3.27%), 0.4% (1 of 262; CI95, 0% to 2.1%), and 0% (0 of 260; CI95, 0% to 1.4%), respectively. Among the 209 patients with positive results on culture for pulmonary TB, 169 (81%) had an expectorated sputum specimen sent, of which 91 (54%) were positive for AFB. Forty (24%) of the 169 patients had a second expectorated sputum specimen sent after the results of the first specimen were negative; only 6 (15%) of these had positive AFB smears. None of the 10 patients in whom the first two expectorated sputum samples yielded an AFB smear without an organism had a third AFB smear that was positive.

Conclusion:

Unless there is high clinical suspicion of pulmonary TB in a specific patient, the use of three AFB smears on expectorated sputa is a rational approach to discontinuing isolation for patients with suspected TB.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Blumberg, HM, Watkins, DL, Berschling, JD, et al. Preventing the nosocomial transmission of tuberculosis. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:658663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Bangsberg, DR, Crowley, K, Moss, A, Dobkin, JF, McGregor, C, Neu, HC. Reduction in tuberculin skin-test conversions among medical house staff associated with improved tuberculosis infection control practices. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:566570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Wenger, PN, Orten, J, Breeden, A, Orfas, D, Beck-Sague, CM, Jarvis, WR. Control of nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis among healthcare workers and HIV-infected patients. Lancet 1995;345:235240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Kelly-Rossini, L, Perlman, DC, Mason, DJ. The experience of respiratory isolation for HIV-infected persons with tuberculosis. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care 1996;7:2936.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for preventing the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in health-care facilities, 1994. MMWR 1994;43(RR-13):64.Google ScholarPubMed
6.Bass, JB, Farer, LS, Hopewell, PC, Jacobs, RF, Snider, DE. Diagnostic standards and classification of tuberculosis. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990;149:13591374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Levy, H, Feldman, C, Sacho, H, van der Meulen, H, Kallenbach, J, Koornhof, H. A reevaluation of sputum microscopy and culture in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Chest 1989;95:11931197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Dutt, AK, Stead, WW. Short-course chemotherapy: the Arkansas experience. Chest 1981;80:724727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Greenbaum, M, Beyt, BEJ, Murray, PR. The accuracy of diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis at a teaching hospital. Am Rev Respir Dis 1980; 121:477481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Kim, TC, Blackman, RS, Heatwole, KM, Kim, T, Rochester, DF. Acid-fast bacilli in sputum smears of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis: prevalence and significance of negative smears pretreatment and positive smears post-treatment. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984;129:264268.Google ScholarPubMed
11.Nelson, SM, Deike, MA, Cartwright, CP. Value of examining multiple sputum specimens in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:467469.Google Scholar
12.Burken, MI, Shea, JA, Johnson, CC, Hershey, JC, Asch, DA. Comparison of sputum microscopy versus nucleic acid amplification for the presumptive diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: a meta-analysis. Clinical Performance and Quality Health Care 1998;6:5359.Google Scholar
13.Grzybowski, S, Barnett, GD, Styblo, K. Contacts of cases of active pulmonary tuberculosis. Bulletin of the International Union for Tuberculosis 1975;50:90106.Google ScholarPubMed
14.Behr, MA, Warren, SA, Salamon, H, et al. Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from patients smear-negative for acid-fast bacilli. Lancet 1999;353:444449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Preventing Nosocomial Transmission of Pulmonary Tuberculosis: When may Isolation be Discontinued for Patients with Suspected Tuberculosis?
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Preventing Nosocomial Transmission of Pulmonary Tuberculosis: When may Isolation be Discontinued for Patients with Suspected Tuberculosis?
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Preventing Nosocomial Transmission of Pulmonary Tuberculosis: When may Isolation be Discontinued for Patients with Suspected Tuberculosis?
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *