Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-ffbbcc459-2vnwq Total loading time: 0.401 Render date: 2022-03-12T10:49:47.306Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Responding to Simulated Pandemic Influenza in San Antonio, Texas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

George Miller*
Affiliation:
Altarum Institute, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Stephen Randolph
Affiliation:
Altarum Institute, San Antonio, Texas
Jan E. Patterson
Affiliation:
Departments of Medicine and Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Centerand South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, Texas
*
Altarum Institute, P.O. Box 134001, Ann Arbor, MI 48113-4001 (george.miller@altarum.org)

Abstract

Objective.

To describe the results of a simulation study of the spread of pandemic influenza, the effects of public health measures on the simulated pandemic, and the resultant adequacy of the surge capacity of the hospital infrastructure and to investigate the adequacy of key elements of the national pandemic influenza plan to reduce the overall attack rate so that surge capacity would not be overwhelmed.

Design.

We used 2 discrete-event simulation models: the first model simulates the contact and disease transmission process, as affected by public health interventions, to produce a stream of arriving patients, and the second model simulates the diagnosis and treatment process and determines patient outcomes.

Setting.

Hypothetical scenarios were based on the response plans, infrastructure, and demographic data of the population of San Antonio, Texas.

Results.

Use of a mix of strategies, including social distancing, antiviral medications, and targeted vaccination, may limit the overall attack rate so that demand for care would not exceed the capacity of the infrastructure. Additional simulations to assess social distancing as a sole mitigation strategy suggest that a reduction of infectious community contacts to half of normal levels would have to occur within approximately 7 days.

Conclusions.

Under ideal conditions, the mix of strategies may limit demand, which can then be met by community surge capacity. Given inadequate supplies of vaccines and antiviral medications, aggressive social distancing alone might allow for the control of a local epidemic without reliance on outside support.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Leitenberg, M. Assessing the biological weapons and bioterrorism threat. Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College, 2005. Available at: http://www.cissm.umd.edu/papers/files/assessing_bw_threat.pdf. Accessed December 28, 2006.Google Scholar
2.US General Accounting Office. Bioterrorism, Federal Research and Preparedness Activities. Washington, DC: US General Accounting Office; 2001:22. GAO01-915.Google Scholar
3.Miller, G, Randolph, S, Gower, D. Simulating the response of a rural acute health-care delivery system to a bioterrorist attack. Intl J Disaster Med 2004;2:2432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Miller, G, Randolph, S, Patterson, JE. Responding to bioterrorist smallpox in San Antonio. Interfaces 2006;36:580590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Elveback, LR, Fox, JP, Ackerman, E, Langworthy, A, Boyd, M, Gatewood, L. An influenza simulation model for immunization studies. Am J Epidemiol 1976;103:152165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Cunha, B. Influenza: historical aspects of epidemics and pandemics. Dis Clin North Am 2004;18:141155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Billings, M. The Influenza Pandemic of 1918. June 1997. Available at: http://virus.stanford.edu/uda/. Accessed December 15, 2006.Google Scholar
8.Homeland Security Council. National Strategy for Pandemic Influenza. Washington, DC: Homeland Security Council; November 2005.Google ScholarPubMed
9.US Department of Health and Human Services. HHS Pandemic Influenza Plan. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; November 2005.Google ScholarPubMed
10.Bootsma, CJ, Ferguson, NM. The effect of public health measures on the 1918 influenza pandemic in US cities. 2007. Available at: http:// www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0611071104. Accessed May 1, 2007.Google Scholar
11.Longini, IM Jr, Nizam, A, Xu, S, et al.Containing pandemic influenza at the source. Science 2005;309:10831087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Ferguson, NM, Cummings, DAT, Cauchemez, S, et al.Strategies for containing an emerging influenza pandemic in Southeast Asia. Nature 2005;437:209214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Germann, TC, Kadau, K, Longini, IM Jr, Macken, CA. Mitigation measures for pandemic influenza in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:59355940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Interim pre-pandemic planning guidance: community strategy for pandemic influenza mitigation in the United States. February 2007. Available at: http://www.pandemicflu.gov/plan/ community/mitigation.html. Accessed February 26, 2007.Google Scholar
15.2000 US Census. Available at: http://www.census.gov/population/www/ projections/st_yr01to05.html. Accessed July 14, 2006.Google Scholar
16.Randolph, S, Miller, G. Validation of the Casualty Prediction Model. Altarum Institute. July 2007. Available at: http://www.altarum.org/ FCKeditor/UserFiles/File/CPMValidation_ib.pdf. Accessed November 19, 2007.Google Scholar
17.Longini, IM, Koopman, JS, Monto, AS, Fox, JP. Estimating household and community transmission parameters for influenza. Am J Epidemiol 1982;115:736751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Longini, IM, Koopman, JS, Haber, M, Cotsonis, GA. Statistical inference for infectious diseases, risk-specific household and community transmission parameters. Am J Epidemiol 1988;128:845859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Barnitz, L. The Health Care Response to Pandemic Influenza: A Position Paper. Washington, DC: American College of Physicians; 2006.Google Scholar
20.Gani, R, Hughes, H, Fleming, D, Griffin, T, Medlock, J, Leach, S. Potential impact of antiviral drug use during influenza pandemic. Emerg Infect Dis 2005;11:13551362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Longini, IM, Halloran, ME, Nizam, A, Yang, Y. Containing pandemic influenza with antiviral agents. Am J Epidemiol 2004;159:623633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Patterson, JE. SARS in Toronto: what does it mean for us? [commentary] Contagion 2005;2:14.Google Scholar
23.Hayden, FG, Pavia, AT. Antiviral management of seasonal and pandemic influenza. J Infect Dis 2006;194:S119S126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Treanor, JJ, Campbell, JD, Zangwill, KM, Rowe, T, Wolff, M. Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated subvirion influenza A (H5N1) vaccine. N Engl J Med 2006;354:13431351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Markei, H, Lipman, HB, Navarro, JA, et al.Nonpharmaceutical interventions implemented by US cities during the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic. JAMA 2007;298:644654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Markei, H, Stern, AM, Navarro, JA, Michaisen, JR. A historical assessment of nonpharmaceutical disease containment strategies employed by selected US communities during the wave of the 1918-1920 influenza pandemic. Defense Threat Reduction Agency, January 31, 2006. Available at: http:// www.med.umich.edu/medschool/chm/influenza/. Accessed August 13, 2007.Google Scholar
11
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Responding to Simulated Pandemic Influenza in San Antonio, Texas
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Responding to Simulated Pandemic Influenza in San Antonio, Texas
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Responding to Simulated Pandemic Influenza in San Antonio, Texas
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *