Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T05:01:48.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effectiveness of a neonatal intensive care unit–specific antimicrobial stewardship program: A ten-year review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2023

Katrina H. Assen
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Vanessa Paquette
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Children’s and Women’s Health Centre of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Arianne Y. Albert
Affiliation:
Women’s Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Ginger Shi
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Jocelyn A. Srigley
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Horacio Osiovich
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Ashley D. Roberts
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Joseph Y. Ting*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
*
Author for correspondence: Joseph Y. Ting, E-mail: joseph.ting@ualberta.ca

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate the change in consumption of specific antibiotics in a neonatal intensive care unit after the implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP).

Design:

Retrospective cohort study between January 1, 2010, and December 31,2019.

Setting:

The neonatal intensive care unit at British Columbia Women’s Hospital (Vancouver Canada), a tertiary-care center.

Patients:

Admitted neonates prescribed antibiotics.

Methods:

We implemented an ASP with an early implementation phase starting in January 2014 (period 2) and a later phase starting in January 2017 (period 3). Patient demographics were collected, including birth weight, gestational age, history of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and surgical operations from existing databases. Interrupted time-series analysis was used, and comparison of antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) averages were conducted across the preimplementation period (period 1), period 2, and period 3 regarding total patients and subgroups.

Results:

We identified 4,512 infants. There was a significant decrease in DOT from 472 (95% confidence interval [CI], 431–517) in period 1 to 405 (95% CI, 367–446) in period 2 to 313 (95% CI, 280–350) in period 3. We detected a significant decrease in the use of ampicillin, aminoglycosides, cloxacillin, and linezolid but not in vancomycin or cefotaxime. Subgroup analyses of infants <1,500 g and those without NEC or surgery showed decreases in the use of cloxacillin, aminoglycosides, and linezolid.

Conclusions:

The implementation of an ASP was associated with a significant decrease in the overall DOT and use of certain antibiotics. This study presents important targets for ongoing ASP work.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Puopolo, KM, Benitz, WE, Zaoutis, TE. Management of neonates born at ≤34 6/7 weeks’ gestation with suspected or proven early-onset bacterial sepsis. Pediatrics 2018;142:e20182896.10.1542/peds.2018-2896CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoll, BJ, Hansen, NI, Bell, EF, et al. Trends in care practices, morbidity, and mortality of extremely preterm neonates, 1993–2012. JAMA 2015;314:10391051.10.1001/jama.2015.10244CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osowicki, J, Gwee, A, Noronha, J, et al. Australia-wide point prevalence survey of antimicrobial prescribing in neonatal units: how much and how good? Pediatr Infect Dis J 2015;34:e185e190.10.1097/INF.0000000000000719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosli, R, Dali, AF, Abd Aziz, N, Abdullah, AH, Ming, LC, Manan, MM. Drug utilization on neonatal wards: a systematic review of observational studies. Front Pharmacol 2017;8:27.10.3389/fphar.2017.00027CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lange, K, Buerger, M, Stallmach, A, Bruns, T. Effects of antibiotics on gut microbiota. Dig Dis 2016;34:260268.10.1159/000443360CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ting, JY, Roberts, A. Association of early life antibiotics and health outcomes: evidence from clinical studies. Semin Perinatol 2020;44:151322.10.1016/j.semperi.2020.151322CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ting, JY, Synnes, A, Roberts, A, et al. Association between antibiotic use and neonatal mortality and morbidities in very low-birthweight infants without culture-proven sepsis or necrotizing enterocolitis. JAMA Pediatrics 2016;170:11811187.10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.2132CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ting, JY, Synnes, A, Roberts, A, et al. Association of antibiotic utilization and neurodevelopmental outcomes among extremely low gestational age neonates without proven sepsis or necrotizing enterocolitis. Am J Perinatol 2018;35:972978.10.1055/s-0038-1632390CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cantey, JB, Pyle, AK, Wozniak, PS, Hynan, LS, Sánchez, PJ. Early antibiotic exposure and adverse outcomes in preterm, very low-birthweight infants. J Pediatr 2018;203.Google Scholar
Johnson, CL, Saiman, L. A blueprint for targeted antimicrobial stewardship in neonatal intensive care units. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:11441146.10.1017/ice.2017.183CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Araujo da Silva, AR, Marques, A, Di Biase, C, et al. Effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in neonatology: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child 2020;105:563568.10.1136/archdischild-2019-318026CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, SJ, Saiman, L. Principles and strategies of antimicrobial stewardship in the neonatal intensive care unit. Semin Perinatol 2012;36:431436.10.1053/j.semperi.2012.06.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ting, JY, Paquette, V, Ng, K, et al. Reduction of inappropriate antimicrobial prescriptions in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit after antimicrobial stewardship care bundle implementation. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2019;38:5459.10.1097/INF.0000000000002039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC’s campaign to prevent antimicrobial resistance in health-care settings. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2002;51:343.Google Scholar
Abstractor’s manual CNN, v.3.4.3. Canadian Neonatal Network website. https://www.canadianneonatalnetwork.org/portal/Portals/0/CNN%20Manuals/CNN%20Manual_20200203.pdf. Accessed January 3, 2023.Google Scholar
Richardson, DK, Corcoran, JD, Escobar, GJ, Lee, SK. SNAP-II and SNAPPE-II: simplified newborn illness severity and mortality risk scores. J Pediatr 2001;138:92100.10.1067/mpd.2001.109608CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flannery, DD, Horbar, JD. Metrics of neonatal antibiotic use. Semin Perinatol 2020;44:151329.10.1016/j.semperi.2020.151329CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
A pRoject Ethics Community Consensus Initiative (ARECCI)> Alberta Innovates website. https://albertainnovates.ca/programs/arecci/. Accessed January 3, 2023.+Alberta+Innovates+website.+https://albertainnovates.ca/programs/arecci/.+Accessed+January+3,+2023.>Google Scholar
Tamma, PD, Cosgrove, SE. Antimicrobial stewardship. Infect Dis Clin N Am 2011;25:245260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nzegwu, NI, Rychalsky, MR, Nallu, LA, et al. Implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program in a neonatal intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:11371143.10.1017/ice.2017.151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thampi, N, Shah, PS, Nelson, S, et al. Prospective audit and feedback on antibiotic use in neonatal intensive care: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pediatr 2019;19:105.10.1186/s12887-019-1481-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cantey, JB, Wozniak, PS, Pruszynski, JE, Sánchez, PJ. Reducing unnecessary antibiotic use in the neonatal intensive care unit (SCOUT): a prospective interrupted time-series study. Lancet Infect Dis 2016;16:11781184.10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30205-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajar, P, Saugstad, OD, Berild, D, et al. Antibiotic stewardship in premature infants: a systematic review. Neonatology 2020;117:673686.10.1159/000511710CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makri, V, Davies, G, Cannell, S, et al. Managing antibiotics wisely: a quality improvement programme in a tertiary neonatal unit in the UK. BMJ Open Qual 2018;7:e000285.10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, JM, Tulloch, J, Brown, K, Caserta, MT, D’Angio, CT. A quality improvement initiative to optimize antibiotic use in a level 4 NICU. Pediatrics 2020;146:e20193956.10.1542/peds.2019-3956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dukhovny, D, Buus-Frank, ME, Edwards, EM, et al. A collaborative multicenter QI initiative to improve antibiotic stewardship in newborns. Pediatrics 2019;144:e20190589.10.1542/peds.2019-0589CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ting, JY, Roberts, A, Sherlock, R, et al. Duration of initial empirical antibiotic therapy and outcomes in very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2019;143:e20182286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurst, AL, Child, J, Pearce, K, Palmer, C, Todd, JK, Parker, SK. Handshake stewardship. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2016;35:11041110.10.1097/INF.0000000000001245CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flannery, DD, Puopolo, KM. Neonatal antibiotic use: how much is too much? Pediatrics 2018;142:e20181942.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Assen et al. supplementary material

Assen et al. supplementary material

Download Assen et al. supplementary material(File)
File 681.6 KB