Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-17T17:44:11.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hospital-level high-risk antibiotic use in relation to hospital-associated Clostridioides difficile infections: Retrospective analysis of 2016–2017 data from US hospitals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2019

Ying P. Tabak
Affiliation:
Becton, Dickinson and Co., Franklin Lakes, New Jersey
Arjun Srinivasan
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Kalvin C. Yu
Affiliation:
Becton, Dickinson and Co., Franklin Lakes, New Jersey
Stephen G. Kurtz
Affiliation:
Becton, Dickinson and Co., Franklin Lakes, New Jersey
Vikas Gupta
Affiliation:
Becton, Dickinson and Co., Franklin Lakes, New Jersey
Steven Gelone
Affiliation:
Nabriva Therapeutics US, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania
Patrick J. Scoble
Affiliation:
Nabriva Therapeutics US, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania
L. Clifford McDonald*
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
*
Author for correspondence: L. Clifford McDonald MD, 1600 Clifton Road, MS A35, Atlanta GA 30333, Email: ljm3@cdc.gov

Abstract

Objective:

Antibiotics are widely used by all specialties in the hospital setting. We evaluated previously defined high-risk antibiotic use in relation to Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs).

Methods:

We analyzed 2016–2017 data from 171 hospitals. High-risk antibiotics included second-, third-, and fourth-generation cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, carbapenems, and lincosamides. A CDI case was a positive stool C. difficile toxin or molecular assay result from a patient without a positive result in the previous 8 weeks. Hospital-associated (HA) CDI cases included specimens collected >3 calendar days after admission or ≤3 calendar days from a patient with a prior same-hospital discharge within 28 days. We used the multivariable Poisson regression model to estimate the relative risk (RR) of high-risk antibiotic use on HA CDI, controlling for confounders.

Results:

The median days of therapy for high-risk antibiotic use was 241.2 (interquartile range [IQR], 192.6–295.2) per 1,000 days present; the overall HA CDI rate was 33 (IQR, 24–43) per 10,000 admissions. The overall correlation of high-risk antibiotic use and HA CDI was 0.22 (P = .003), and higher correlation was observed in teaching hospitals (0.38; P = .002). For every 100-day (per 1,000 days present) increase in high-risk antibiotic therapy, there was a 12% increase in HA CDI (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.04–1.21; P = .002) after adjusting for confounders.

Conclusions:

High-risk antibiotic use is an independent predictor of HA CDI. This assessment of poststewardship implementation in the United States highlights the importance of tracking trends of antimicrobial use over time as it relates to CDI.

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
This work is classified, for copyright purposes, as a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection within the United States.
Copyright
© 2019 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

PREVIOUS PRESENTATION. The preliminary results of this study were presented in part at the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Conference on April 21, 2018, in Madrid, Spain, and at the American Society for Microbiology conference on June 9, 2018, in Atlanta, Georgia.

References

McDonald, LC, Gerding, DN, Johnson, S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults and children: 2017 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). Clin Infect Dis 2018;66(7):e1e48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magill, SS, Edwards, JR, Bamberg, W, et al. Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care-associated infections. N Engl J Med 2014;370:11981208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lessa, FC, Mu, Y, Bamberg, WM, et al. Burden of Clostridium difficile infection in the United States. N Engl J Med 2015;372:825834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leffler, DA, Lamont, JT. Clostridium difficile infection. N Engl J Med 2015;373(3):287288.Google ScholarPubMed
Brown, KA, Daneman, N, Jones, M, et al. The drivers of acute and long-term care Clostridium difficile infection rates: a retrospective multilevel cohort study of 251 facilities. Clin Infect Dis 2017;65:12821288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slimings, C, Riley, TV. Antibiotics and hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile infection: update of systematic review and meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother 2014;69:881891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tartof, SY, Rieg, GK, Wei, R, Tseng, HF, Jacobsen, SJ, Yu, KC. A comprehensive assessment across the healthcare continuum: risk of hospital-associated Clostridium difficile infection due to outpatient and inpatient antibiotic exposure. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36:14091416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, AE, Johannes, RS, Gupta, V, Tabak, YP, Srinivasan, A, Bleasdale, SC. The effect of a piperacillin/tazobactam shortage on antimicrobial prescribing and Clostridium difficile risk in 88 US medical centers. Clin Infect Dis 2017;15:613618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, LC, Owings, M, Jernigan, DB. Clostridium difficile infection in patients discharged from US short-stay hospitals, 1996–2003. Emerg Infect Dis 2006;12:409415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antibiotic use in the United States, 2017: progress and opportunities. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use/stewardship-report/pdf/stewardship-report.pdf. Published 2017. Accessed September 21, 2018.Google Scholar
Bobulsky, GS, Al-Nassir, WN, Riggs, MM, Sethi, AK, Donskey, CJ. Clostridium difficile skin contamination in patients with C. difficile–associated disease. Clin Infect Dis 2008;46:447450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sethi, AK, Al-Nassir, WN, Nerandzic, MM, Bobulsky, GS, Donskey, CJ. Persistence of skin contamination and environmental shedding of Clostridium difficile during and after treatment of C. difficile infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:2127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, K, Valenta, K, Fisman, D, Simor, A, Daneman, N. Hospital ward antibiotic prescribing and the risks of Clostridium difficile infection. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:626633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freedberg, DE, Salmasian, H, Cohen, B, Abrams, JA, Larson, EL. Receipt of antibiotics in hospitalized patients and risk for Clostridium difficile infection in subsequent patients who occupy the same bed. JAMA Intern Med 2016;176:18011808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Get smart: know when antibiotics work. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/getsmart/community/materials-references/print-materials/everyone/index.html. Accessed September 21, 2018.Google Scholar
Kazakova, SV, Baggs, J, McDonald, LC, et al. Association between antibiotic use and hospital-onset Clostridioides difficile infection in US acute care hospitals, 2006–2012: an ecologic analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2019. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villafuerte-Galvez, JA, Kelly, CP. Proton pump inhibitors and risk of Clostridium difficile infection: association or causation? Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2018;34:1118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cao, F, Chen, CX, Wang, M, et al. Updated meta-analysis of controlled observational studies: proton-pump inhibitors and risk of Clostridium difficile infection. J Hosp Infect 2018;98:413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barletta, JF, Sclar, DA. Proton pump inhibitors increase the risk for hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile infection in critically ill patients. Crit Care 2014;18:714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faleck, DM, Salmasian, H, Furuya, EY, Larson, EL, Abrams, JA, Freedberg, DE. Proton pump inhibitors do not increase risk for Clostridium difficile infection in the intensive care unit. Am J Gastroenterol 2016;111:16411648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zilberberg, MD, Tabak, YP, Sievert, DM, et al. Using electronic health information to risk-stratify rates of Clostridium difficile infection in US hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:649655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabak, YP, Zilberberg, MD, Johannes, RS, Sun, X, McDonald, LC. Attributable burden of hospital-onset Clostridium difficile infection: a propensity score matching study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:588596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antimicrobial use and resistance (AUR) module. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/pscManual/11pscAURcurrent.pdf. Published 2019. Accessed April 3, 2019.Google Scholar
Core elements of hospital antibiotic stewardship programs. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use/healthcare/pdfs/core-elements.pdf. Published 2014. Accessed July 8, 2019.Google Scholar
Reported uptake of CDC’s core elements of hospital antibiotic stewardship programs in US acute care hospitals, 2017. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/PSA/STMapView.html. Published 2017. Accessed July 26, 2019.Google Scholar
Yu, K, Rho, J, Morcos, M, et al. Evaluation of dedicated infectious diseases pharmacists on antimicrobial stewardship teams. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2014;71:10191028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dingle, KE, Didelot, X, Quan, TP, et al. Effects of control interventions on Clostridium difficile infection in England: an observational study. Lancet Infect Dis 2017;17:411421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National action plan to prevent health care-associated infections: road map to elimination. Phase four: coordination among Federal partners to leverage HAI prevention and antibiotic. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion website. https://health.gov/hcq/pdfs/National_Action_Plan_to_Prevent_HAIs_Phase_IV_2018.pdf. Published 2018. Accessed July 8, 2019.Google Scholar
FDA updates warnings for fluoroquinolone antibiotics. US Food and Drug Administration website. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-updates-warnings-fluoroquinolone-antibiotics. Published 2014. Accessed July 8, 2019.Google Scholar
van Santen, KL, Edwards, JR, Webb, AK, et al. The standardized antimicrobial administration ratio: a new metric for measuring and comparing antibiotic use. Clin Infect Dis 2018;67:179185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kazakova, S, Baggs, J, McDonald, L, et al. Association of hospital-onset Clostridium difficile infection rates and antibiotic use in US acute care hospitals, 2006–2012: an ecologic analysis. Oral abstract session: CDI Prevention. October 5, 2017, IDWEEK, San Diego, CA. Infectious Diseases Society of America website. https://idsa.confex.com/idsa/2017/webprogram/Paper64581.html. Published 2017. Accessed March 22, 2019.Google Scholar
Data summary of HAIs in the United States: assessing progress 2006–2016. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/hai/data/archive/data-summary-assessing-progress.html. Published 2018. Accessed December 14, 2018.Google Scholar
The NHSN standardized infection ratio (SIR): a guide to the SIR. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/ps-analysis-resources/nhsn-sir-guide.pdf. Published 2017. Accessed September 19, 2018.Google Scholar
Multidrug-resistant organism and Clostridioides difficile infection (MDRO/CDI) module. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/12pscmdro_cdadcurrent.pdf. Accessed December 14, 2018.Google Scholar
Talpaert, MJ, Gopal Rao, G, Cooper, BS, Wade, P. Impact of guidelines and enhanced antibiotic stewardship on reducing broad-spectrum antibiotic usage and its effect on incidence of Clostridium difficile infection. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011;66:21682174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Tabak et al. supplementary material

Appendix A

Download Tabak et al. supplementary material(File)
File 44 KB
Supplementary material: File

Tabak et al. supplementary material

Appendix B

Download Tabak et al. supplementary material(File)
File 44 KB