Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Improved Risk Adjustment for Comparison of Surgical Site Infection Rates

  • Eveline L. P. E. Geubbels (a1) (a2), Diederick E. Grobbee (a3), Christina M. J. E. Vandenbroucke-Grauls (a4), Jan C. Wille (a5) and Annette S. de Boer (a1)...
Abstract
Objective.

To develop prognostic models for improved risk adjustment in surgical site infection surveillance for 5 surgical procedures and to compare these models with the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance system (NNIS) risk index.

Design.

In a multicenter cohort study, prospective assessment of surgical site infection and risk factors was performed from 1996 to 2000. In addition, risk factors abstracted from patient files, available in a national medical register, were used. The c-index was used to measure the ability of procedure-specific logistic regression models to predict surgical site infection and to compare these models with models based on the NNIS risk index. A c-index of 0.5 indicates no predictive power, and 1.0 indicates perfect predictive power.

Setting.

Sixty-two acute care hospitals in the Dutch national surveillance network for nosocomial infections.

Participants.

Patients who underwent 1 of 5 procedures for which the predictive ability of the NNIS risk index was moderate: reconstruction of the aorta (n = 875), femoropopliteal or femorotibial bypass (n = 641), colectomy (n = 1,142), primarytotal hip prosthesis (n = 13,770), and cesarean section (n = 2,962).

Results.

The predictive power of the new model versus the NNIS index was 0.75 versus 0.62 for reconstruction of the aorta (P< .01), 0.78 versus 0.58 for femoropopliteal or femorotibial bypass (P< .001), 0.69 versus 0.62 for colectomy (P< .001), 0.64 versus 0.56 for primary total hip prosthesis arthroplasty (P< .001), and 0.70 versus 0.54 for cesarean section (P< .001).

Conclusion.

Data available from hospital information systems can be used to develop models that are better at predicting the risk of surgical site infection than the NNIS risk index. Additional data collection may be indicated for certain procedures–for example, total hip prosthesis arthroplasty.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement, PO Box 20064, 3502 LB, Utrecht, The Netherlands (j.wille@cbo.nl)
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

1. DH Culver , TC Horan , RP Gaynes , et al. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med 1991; 91:152S157S.

2. R Coello , P Gastmeier , AS de Boer . Surveillance of hospital-acquired infection in England, Germany, and The Netherlands: will international comparison of rates be possible? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001; 22:393397.

3. RW Haley , DH Culver , WM Morgan , JW White , TG Emori , TM Hooton . Identifying patients at high risk of surgical wound infection: a simple multivariate index of patient susceptibility and wound contamination. Am J Epidemiol 1985; 121:206215.

6. RP Gaynes . Surgical-site infections and the NNIS SSI Risk Index: room for improvement. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000; 21:184185.

7. RP Gaynes . Surgical-site infections (SSI) and the NNIS Basic SSI Risk Index, part II: room for improvement. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:266267.

8. MC Roy , LA Herwaldt , R Embrey , K Kuhns , RP Wenzel , TM Perl . Does the Centers for Disease Control's NNIS system risk index stratify patients undergoing cardiothoracic operations by their risk of surgical-site infection? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000; 21:186190.

10. TS Tran , S Jamulitrat , V Chongsuvivatwong , A Geater . Risk factors for postcesarean surgical site infection. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95:367371.

11. R Tang , HH Chen , YL Wang , et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection after elective resection of the colon and rectum: a single-center prospective study of 2,809 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 2001; 234:181189.

13. JS Garner , WR Jarvis , TG Emori , TC Horan , JM Hughes . CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 1988; 16:128140.

14. TC Horan , RP Gaynes , WJ Martone , WR Jarvis , TG Emori . CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992; 13:606608.

15. K Sands , G Vineyard , R Platt . Surgical site infections occurring after hospital discharge. J Infect Dis 1996; 173:963970.

16. JA Hanley , BJ McNeil . The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143:2936.

17. FE Harrell Jr, KL Lee , DB Mark . Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 1996; 15:361387.

18. JA Hanley , BJ McNeil . A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983; 148:839843.

22. TJ Bunt . Vascular graft infections: an update. Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 9:225233.

23. HM Richet , C Chidiac , A Prat , et al. Analysis of risk factors for surgical wound infections following vascular surgery. Am J Med 1991; 91: 170S172S.

24. WH Edwards Jr, AB Kaiser , S Tapper , et al. Cefamandole versus cefazolin in vascular surgical wound infection prophylaxis: cost-effectiveness and risk factors. J Vasc Surg 1993; 18:470475; discussion 475-476.

25. J Miransky , L Ruo , S Nicoletta , et al. Impact of a surgeon-trained observer on accuracy of colorectal surgical site infection rates. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:11001105.

26. Y Siegman-Igra , R Rozin , E Simchen . Determinants of wound infection in gastrointestinal operations: the Israeli study of surgical infections. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46:133140.

29. RW Haley , DH Culver , JW White , et al. The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals. Am J Epidemiol 1985; 121:182205.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
  • ISSN: 0899-823X
  • EISSN: 1559-6834
  • URL: /core/journals/infection-control-and-hospital-epidemiology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 1 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 41 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.