Skip to main content
×
Home

Improving Hand Hygiene Compliance in Hospitals by Design

  • Marijke Melles (a1), Vicki Erasmus (a2), Martijn P. M. van Loon (a1), Marc Tassoul (a1), Ed F. van Beeck (a2) and Margreet C. Vos (a3)...
Abstract

Essential in reducing hospital-acquired infections is adequate hand hygiene (HH) among healthcare workers (HCWs). International studies show, however, that HH guidelines are adhered to in less than 50% of required times. Research into HH behavior has shown that self-reported compliance is often higher than observed compliance, which seems to indicate that HCWs are unaware of their HH behavior. In addition, because of its frequency, HH behavior could be considered an automatic (or subconscious) behavior. Therefore, a (temporary) shift from the subconscious to the conscious could be a solution to change current HH behavior and create new habits. These insights formed the points of departure of the design project described here, which aimed to develop an alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) dispenser to stimulate HCWs to better adhere to the international guidelines of HH. In order to increase the chance of success of the new dispenser, a participatory design approach was applied, meaning that all stakeholders of the dispenser (nurses, physicians, infection control practitioners, housekeeping) were actively involved in the different phases of the development process.

The development process of the new dispenser consisted of 5 phases: analysis, idea finding (identifying promising design directions), and 3 idea iterations. Interim ideas were evaluated using functional 3-dimensional prototypes and the results applied to further develop the final concept. Methods of user research included observations and individual and focus group interviews.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Landbergstraat 15, 2628 CE Delft, The Netherlands (m.melles@tudelft.nl)
References
Hide All
1.Donaldson L. Dirty Hands: The Human Cost. London: UK Department of Public Health, 2006.
2.Erasmus V, Daha TJ, Brug J, et al. A systematic review of studies on compliance to hand hygiene guidelines in health care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31(3):283294.
3.Verplanken B, Aarts H. Habit, attitude and planned behaviour: is habit an empty construct or an interesting case of goal-directed automaticity?Eur Rev Soc Psychol 1999:101134.
4.Allegranzi B, Storr J, Dziekan G, Leotsakos A, Donaldson L, Pittet D. The first global patient safety challenge “clean care is safer care”: from launch to current progress and achievements. J Hosp Infect 2007;65(suppl 2):115123.
5.Van Loon M. Getting Hands Clean: Developing a Handhygiene Reminder for the Intensive Care Unit and the Surgical Ward. Delft, Netherlands: Delft University of Technology, 2009.
6.Schuler D, Namioka A. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993.
7.Preece J, Rogers Y, Sharp H. Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. New York: Wiley, 2002.
8.Sax H, Allegranzi B, Uckay I, Larson E, Boyce J, Pittet D. “My five moments for hand hygiene”: a user-centred design approach to understand, train, monitor and report hand hygiene. J Hosp Inect 2007;67(1):921.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
  • ISSN: 0899-823X
  • EISSN: 1559-6834
  • URL: /core/journals/infection-control-and-hospital-epidemiology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 87 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 251 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.