Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

A Quality Management Project in 8 Selected Hospitals to Reduce Nosocomial Infections: A Prospective, Controlled Study

  • Petra Gastmeier (a1), Helga Bräuer (a1), Dietmar Forster (a2), Eckehard Dietz (a1), Franz Daschner (a2) and Henning Rüden (a1)...
Abstract
Objective:

To reduce the number of nosocomial infections (NIs) in surgical patients by a quality management approach.

Design:

Prospective, controlled study in 8 medium-sized hospitals during a 26-month period.

Setting:

Four study hospitals and 4 control hospitals.

Methods:

In two 10-month intervention periods, 4 external physicians introduced quality circles and ongoing surveillance in the 4 study hospitals. There were three 8-week observation periods in all 8 hospitals with the same physicians before, during, and after the intervention periods.

Results:

During the first observation period, almost identical overall incidence densities were found for the study hospitals and the control hospitals. During the course of the study, the overall incidence density decreased significantly in the study hospitals (risk ratio [RR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 0.59 to 0.94) and nonsignificantly in the control hospitals (RR, 0.90; CI95 0.70 to 1.16). With the use of a Cox regression model to evaluate the impact of the intervention periods while taking into account the distribution of risk factors for NI in both groups, a significant risk reduction (RR, 0.75; CI95, 0.58 to 0.97) was observed after the first intervention period when comparing study and control hospitals. At the end of the study (ie, after the second intervention period), the difference between the study hospitals and the control hospitals was not significant (RR, 0.78; CI95, 0.60 to 1.01). This was due to no further improvement at the end of the study in the study hospitals and a decrease in the control hospitals.

Conclusion:

This study demonstrates that NI rates can be significantly reduced by appropriate intervention methods in hospitals that are interested in quality management activities. However, continuous intense efforts are necessary to maintain these improvements.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology, Medical School Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30 625 Hannover, Germany
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

2. MM Olson , JT Lee . Continuous, 10 year wound infection surveillance: results, advantages and unanswered questions. Arch Surg 1990;125:794803.

3. SI Kelleghan , C Salemi , S Padilla , et al. An effective continuous quality improvement approach to the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Inject Control 1993;21:322330.

6. A Goetz , S Kedzuf , M Wagener , RR Muder . Feedback to nursing staff as an intervention to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:402404.

7. D Bishop-Kurylo . The clinical experience of continuous quality improvement in the neonatal intensive care unit. Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing 1998;12:5157.

9. P Eggimann , S Harbarth , M-N Constantin , S Touvenau , J-C Chevrolet , D Pittet . Impact of a prevention strategy targeted at vascular-access care on incidence of infections acquired in intensive care. Lancet 2000;355:18641868.

10. W Scheckler , D Brimhall , A Buck , et al. Requirements for infrastructure and essential activities of infection control and epidemiology in hospitals: a consensus panel report. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:114124.

11. DH Forster , G Krause , P Gastmeier et al. Can quality circles improve nosocomial infection control? J Hosp Infect 2000;45:302310.

12. TG Emori , DH Culver , TC Horan , et al. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (NNIS): description of surveillance methodology. Am J Infect Control 1991;19:1935.

13. JS Garner , WR Emori , TC Horan , JM Hughes . CDC definitions for nosocomial infections. Am J Infect Control 1988;16:128140.

14. TC Horan , RP Gaynes , WJ Martone , WR Jarvis , TG Emori . CDC definitions of surgical site infections: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:606608.

15. WR McCabe , GJ Jackson . Gram-negative bacteremia: etiology, ecology, clinical laboratory and therapeutic observations. Arch Intern Med 1962;110:847864.

17. D Pittet , S Hugonnet , S Harbarth , et al. Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene. Lancet 2000;356:13071312.

18. P Gastmeier , D Sohr , A Rath , et al. Repeated prevalence investigations on nosocomial infections for continuous surveillance. J Hosp Infect 2000;45:4753.

19. P Gastmeier , G Kampf , T Hauer , et al. Experience with two validation methods in a prevalence survey on nosocomial infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:668673.

21.Quality Indicator Study Group. An approach to the evaluation of quality indicators of the outcome of care in hospitalized patients with a focus on nosocomial infection indicators. Am J Infect Control 1995;23:215222.

22. D Greco , ML Moro , AE Tozzi , GV De Giacomi , and the Italian PRINOS Study Group. Effectiveness of an intervention program in reducing postoperative infections. Am J Med 1991;91 (suppl 3B):164S169S.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
  • ISSN: 0899-823X
  • EISSN: 1559-6834
  • URL: /core/journals/infection-control-and-hospital-epidemiology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 1 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 67 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th April 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.