Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T21:03:22.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to Maiwald et al

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Rakesh D. Mistry ,
Lauren Marlowe  and
Theoklis E. Zaoutis
Rakesh D. Mistry*
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Lauren Marlowe
Affiliation:
Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Theoklis E. Zaoutis
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
*
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th and Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 31 , Issue 10 , October 2010 , pp. 1096 - 1097
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Maiwald, M, Widmer, AF, Rotter, ML. Chlorhexidine is not the main active ingredient in skin antiseptics that reduce blood culture contamination rates [letter]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31(10):1095–1096 (in this issue).Google Scholar
2.Marlowe, L, Mistry, RD, Coffin, S, et al.Blood culture contamination rates after skin antisepsis with Chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone-iodine in a pediatric emergency department. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31(2):171–176.Google Scholar
3.Calfee, DP, Farr, BM. Comparison of four antiseptic preparations for skin in the prevention of contamination of percutaneously drawn blood cultures: a randomized trial. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40(5):1660–1665.Google Scholar
4.Little, JR, Murray, PR, Traynor, PS, Spitznagel, E. A randomized trial of povidone-iodine compared with iodine tincture for venipuncture site disinfection: effects on rates of blood culture contamination. Am J Med 1999;107(2):119–125.Google Scholar
5.Strand, CL, Wajsbort, RR, Sturmann, K. Effect of iodophor vs iodine tincture skin preparation on blood culture contamination rate. JAMA 1993;269(8):1004–1006.Google Scholar
6.Kiyoyama, T, Tokuda, Y, Shiiki, S, Hachiman, T, Shimasaki, T, Endo, K. Isopropyl alcohol compared with isopropyl alcohol plus povidone-iodine as skin preparation for prevention of blood culture contamination. J Clin Microbiol 2009;47(1):54–58.Google Scholar