Skip to main content
×
×
Home

A Survey of Reprocessing Methods, Residual Viable Bioburden, and Soil Levels in Patient-Ready Endoscopic Retrograde Choliangiopancreatography Duodenoscopes Used in Canadian Centers

  • Michelle J. Alfa (a1) (a2), Nancy Olson (a1), Pat DeGagne (a1) and Michele Jackson (a1)
Abstract
Objectives:

To obtain information about current reprocessing practices and to obtain samples from the biopsy channel to quantitate soil levels and bioburden in patient-ready flexible duodenoscopes used for endoscopic retrograde choliangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Design:

Participating centers were sent a questionnaire and a kit for on-site collection of samples from the biopsy channel of the duodenoscope.

Setting:

Thirty-seven hospitals from across Canada participated. The only criterion was that they currently used and reprocessed flexible duodenoscopes for ERCP procedures.

Methods:

The questionnaire obtained information on reprocessing practices. The kit included a detailed instruction booklet outlining sample collection and all of the tubes, sterile water, and brushes needed for it. Samples were collected on-site from all ERCP scopes in each center on Monday morning and shipped by overnight courier on ice to the research center. Each sample was assayed by routine microbiologic methods for total viable count and protein, blood, carbohydrate, and endotoxin levels.

Results:

Microbial overgrowth was present in 7% of 119 scope samples. Cleaning appeared to be reasonably well done in most of the centers, and 43% of the centers were in total compliance with basic national guidelines. The data from the scope samples indicated that there was significantly greater buildup of protein, carbohydrate, and endotoxin associated with ERCP scopes from centers using glutaraldehyde, compared with those using peracetic acid. Carbohydrate was the soil component detected most frequently and in the highest concentration in scope channels.

Conclusions:

Although cleaning was generally well done, areas for improvement included ensuring the availability of written reprocessing protocols, immersion of scopes during manual cleaning, use of adequate fluid volume for rinsing, adequate drying of scopes prior to storage, and the separation of ERCP valves from scopes during storage.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Allied Health Professions, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202
References
Hide All
1.Bond, WW. Overview of infection control problems. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 2000:199213.
2.Van Dam, J, Brugge, WR. Endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract. N Engl J Med 1999;341:17381748.
3.DiMarino, AJ Jr, Gage, T, Leung, J, et al. Reprocessing of flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc 1996;43:540546.
4.Martin, MA, Reichelderfer, M, Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. 1991, 1992, and 1993 APIC Guidelines Committee. APIC guideline for infection prevention and control in flexible endoscopy. APIC Guidelines 1994;22:1938.
5.Schembre, DB. Infectious complications associated with gastrointestinal endoscopy. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 2000:215232.
6.Allen, JI, Allen, MO, Olson, MM, et al. Pseudomonas infection of the biliary system resulting from use of a contaminated endoscope. Gastroenterology 1987;92:759763.
7.Blanc, DS, Parret, T, Janin, B, Raselli, P, Francioli, P. Nosocomial infections and pseudoinfections from contaminated bronchoscopes: two-year follow up using molecular markers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:134136.
8.Feigal, DW, Hughes, JM. FDA and CDC Public Health Advisory: infection from endoscopes inadequately reprocessed by an automated endoscope reprocessing system. Available at www.fda/gov/cdrh/safety/endoreprocess.html.
9.Michele, TM, Cronin, WA, Graham, NMH, et al. Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by a fiberoptic bronchoscope. JAMA 1997;278:10931095.
10.Nicolle, LE, McLeod, J, Romance, L, Parker, S, Paraskevas, M. Pseudo-outbreak of blastomycosis associated with contaminated bronchoscopes. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:324.
11.Agerton, T, Valway, S, Gore, B, Pozsik, C, Plikaytis, B, Woodley, C. Transmission of a highly drug-resistant strain (strain W1) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: community outbreak and nosocomial transmission via a contaminated bronchoscope. JAMA 1997;278:10731077.
12.Urayama, S, Kozarek, RA, Sumida, S, Raltz, S, Merriam, L, Pethigal, P. Mycobacteria and glutaraldehyde: is high-level disinfection of endoscopes possible? Gastrointest Endosc 1996;43:451456.
13.Deva, AK, Vickery, K, Zou, J, et al. Detection of persistent vegetative bacteria and amplified viral nucleic acid from in-use testing of gastrointestinal endoscopes. J Hosp Infect 1998;39:149157.
14.Spach, DH, Silverstein, FE, Stamm, WE. Transmission of infection by gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118:117128.
15.Bronowicki, JP, Venard, V, Botte, C, et al. Patient-to-patient transmission of hepatitis C virus during colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 1997;337:237240.
16.Alfa, M, Sitter, DL. In-hospital evaluation of contamination of duodenoscopes: a quantitative assessment of the effect of drying. J Hosp Infect 1991;19:8998.
17.Wenzel, RP, Edmond, MB. Tuberculosis infection after bronchoscopy. JAMA 1997;278:111.
18.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Bronchoscopy-related infections and pseudoinfections—New York, 1996 and 1998. MMWR 1997;48:557560.
19.BSG Endoscopy Committee Working Party. Cleaning and disinfection of equipment for gastrointestinal endoscopy: report of a Working Party of the British Society of Gastroenterology Endoscopy Committee. Gut 1998;42:585593.
20.Cowen, A, ed. Infection Control in Endoscopy Guidelines 1999, 4th ed. Sydney, Australia: Gastroenterological Society of Australia; 1999.
21.Kaczmarek, RG, Moore, RM, McCrohan, J, et al. Multi-state investigation of the actual disinfection/sterilization of endoscopes in health care facilities. Am J Med 1992;92:257261.
22.Reynolds, CD, Rhinehart, E, Dreyer, P, Goldmann, DA. Variability in reprocessing policies and procedures for flexible fiberoptic endoscopes in Massachusetts hospitals. Am J Infect Control 1992;20:283290.
23.Rutala, WA, Gergen, MF, Jones, JF, Weber, DJ. Levels of microbial contamination on surgical instruments. Am J Infect Control 1998;26:143145.
24.Chan-Myers, H, McAlister, D, Antonoplos, P. Natural bioburden levels detected on rigid lumened medical devices before and after cleaning. Am J Infect Control 1997;25:471476.
25.Chu, NS, McAlister, D, Antonoplos, PA. Natural bioburden levels detected on flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes after clinical use and manual cleaning. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:137142.
26.Chu, NS, Chan-Myers, H, Ghazanfari, N, Antonoplos, P. Levels of naturally occurring microorganisms on surgical instruments after clinical use and after washing. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:315319.
27.Isenberg, HD, ed. Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994.
28.Alfa, MJ, DeGagne, P, Olson, N. Worst-case soiling levels for patient-used flexible endoscopes before and after cleaning. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:392401.
29.Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates. Guideline for the use of high-level disinfectants and sterilants for reprocessing of flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes. Gastroenterology Nursing 1999;22:127134.
30.Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. Water quality for dialysis. In: AAMI Standards and Recommended Practices, vol. 3. Arlington, VA: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation; 1996:19.
31.Environmental Health Directorate Health Canada. Summary of Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Environmental Health Directorate Health Canada, Federal-Provincial Subcommittee on Drinking Water and Secretariat; 1999.
32.Walter, VA, DiMarino, AJ. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates Endoscope Reprocessing Guidelines. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America: Endoscopic Disinfection and Reprocessing of Endoscopic Accessories. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 2000;10:265273.
33.Tandon, RK, Ahuja, V. Non-United States guidelines for endoscope reprocessing. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 2000:295318.
34.Riouful, C, Devys, C, Meunier, G, Perraud, M, Goullet, D. Quantitative determination of endotoxins released by bacterial biofilms. J Hosp Infect 1999;43:203209.
35.Tucker, RC, Lestini, BJ, Marchant, RE. Surface analysis of clinically used expanded PTFE endoscopic tubing treated by the STERIS process. ASAIO J 1996;42:306313.
36.McDonnell, G, Russell, AD. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 1999;12:147179.
37.Karon, R, Jacobson, D, Wittrock, B, Lavin, MA, Wurtz, R. Open or closed: how do you store your endoscopes? Am J Infect Control 1999:218.
38.Jette, LP, Ringuette, L, Ishak, M, Miller, M, Saint-Antoine, P. Evaluation of three glutaraldehyde-based disinfectants used in endoscopy. J Hosp Infect 1995;30:295303.
39.Rutala, WA, Weber, DJ. Disinfection of endoscopes: review of new chemical sterilants used for high-level disinfection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:6976.
40.Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. Safe Handling and Biological Decontamination of Medical Devices in Health Care Facilities and in Nonclinical Settings. ANSI/AAMIST35. Arlington, VAAssociation for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation; 1996:115.
41.West, AB, Kuan, SF, Bennick, M, Lagarde, S. Glutaraldehyde colitis following endoscopy: clinical and pathological features and investigation of an outbreak. Gastroenterology 1995;108:12501255.
42.Fraser, VJ, Zuckerman, G, Clouse, RE, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing manual and automated endoscope disinfection methods. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1993;14:383389.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
  • ISSN: 0899-823X
  • EISSN: 1559-6834
  • URL: /core/journals/infection-control-and-hospital-epidemiology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 10 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 281 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 12th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.