Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Use of Censored Data to Monitor Surgical-Site Infections

  • Pascal Thibon (a1) (a2), J. J. Parienti (a2), F. Borgey (a1) (a3), A. Le Prieur (a1) (a4), C. Bernet (a1) (a2), B. Branger (a5) and X. Le Coutour (a1) (a2)...

To take into account the proportion of patients lost to follow-up when calculating surgical-site infection (SSI) rates.


A multicenter SSI monitoring network in Basse-Normandie, France, using the definitions for SSI of the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


Between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 1999, 3,705 patients were operated on in 25 units of 10 institutions.


Of the patients, 41.2% (range, 5.1% to 95.5%) were seen 30 days or more after their operation. The global SSI attack rate was 2.19% (95% confidence interval, 1.72% to 2.66%). With the use of the Kaplan–Meier method, the incidence rate was 3.11% (95% confidence interval, 3.06% to 3.16%). The difference between the attack rate and the Kaplan–Meier incidence rate for each unit varied according to the percentage of patients seen on or after day 30 postoperatively and the number of SSIs diagnosed in patients seen on or after day 30.


Practice guidelines are needed for the international monitoring for postdischarge SSIs and the calculation of SSI rates. The proportion of patients seen 30 days after their operation is a major quality criterion for SSI monitoring and should be routinely given in monitoring reports, oral communications, and publications to compare results obtained by different teams.

Corresponding author
Service d'Hygiène Hospitalière, niveau 1, CHU de Caen, 14033 Caen Cedex, France
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

2. ETM Smyth , AM Emmerson . Surgical site infection surveillance. J Hosp Infect 2000;45:173184.

3. TC Horan , RP Gaynes , WJ Martone , WR Jarvis , TG Emori . CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:606608.

5. R Mertens , JM Van den Berg , MLV Veerman-Brenzikofer , X Kurz , B Jans , N Klaanga . International comparison of results of infection surveillance: The Netherlands versus Belgium. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994;15:574580.

6. DJ Byrne , W Lynch , A Napier , P Davey , M Malek , A Cuschieri . Wound infection rates: the importance of definition and post-discharge wound surveillance. J Hosp Infect 1994;26:3743.

10. RC Couto , TM Pedrosa , JM Nogueira , DL Gomes , MF Neto , NA Rezende . Post-discharge surveillance and infection rates in obstetric patients. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1998;61:227231.

11. FA Manian , L Meyer . Adjunctive use of monthly physician questionnaires for surveillance of surgical site infections after hospital discharge and in ambulatory surgical patients: report of a seven-year experience. Am J Infect Control 1997;25:390394.

12. M Seaman , R Lammers . Inability of patients to self-diagnose wound infections. J Emerg Med 1991;9:215219.

13. DH Mitchel , G Swift , GL Gilbert . Surgical wound infection surveillance: the importance of infections that develop after hospital discharge. Aust NZJ Surg 1999;69:117120.

14. K Sands , G Vineyard , R Platt . Surgical site infections occurring after hospital discharge. J Infect Dis 1996;173:963970.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
  • ISSN: 0899-823X
  • EISSN: 1559-6834
  • URL: /core/journals/infection-control-and-hospital-epidemiology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Abstract views

Total abstract views: 24 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.