Hostname: page-component-8678677fb7-6w47d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-10-05T01:35:41.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

LEGAL TRANSPLANT AND UNDUE INFLUENCE: LOST IN TRANSLATION OR A WORKING MISUNDERSTANDING?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2013

Mindy Chen-Wishart*
Affiliation:
Merton College, Oxford University, National University of Singapore (fractional), mindy.chen-wishart@merton.ox.ac.uk.

Abstract

Is legal transplant possible? The stark bipolarity of a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer attracted by such a question is much less interesting and revealing than the question: what shapes the life of legal transplants? The answer to the latter question is contingent on a wide range of variables triggered by the particular transplant; the result can occupy any point along the spectrum from faithful replication to outright rejection. This case study of the transplant of the English doctrine of undue influence into Singaporean law asks why the Singaporean courts have applied the doctrine in family guarantee cases to such divergent effect, when they profess to apply the same law. The answer owes less to grand theories than to a careful examination of the nature of the transplanted law and the relationship between the formal and informal legal orders of the originating and the recipient society raised by the particular transplant.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable