Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T11:25:16.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tort Liability of Public Authorities in Comparative Perspective. Edited by Duncan FAIRGRIEVE, MADS ANDENAS, and JOHN BELL with a foreword by the RT HON LADY JUSTICE ARDEN DBE [London: BIICL, 2002. 581pp. ISBN 0-903067-72-2]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2008

Paula Giliker
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
International & Comparative Law Quarterly , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , July 2004 , pp. 776 - 778
Copyright
Copyright © British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For example, in the United Kingdom, prior to the Crown Proceedings Act 1947, the Crown had immunity in tort. Note also the position in Israel (discussed in ch 16) and the Netherlands (ch 19).Google Scholar

2 See Stapleton, J ‘Duty of care: peripheral parties and alternative opportunities for deterrence’ (1995) 111 LQR 301.Google Scholar

3 Rights Brought Home: The Human Rights Bill (Cm 3782).Google Scholar

4 See Stovin v Wise [1996] AC 923.Google Scholar

5 Op cit, at 80.Google Scholar

6 [2003] EWCA Civ 1151 [2003] 4 All ER 796.Google Scholar

7 [2003] 1 AC 32, at 66.Google Scholar