Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Volume 62, Issue 2
  • April 2013, pp. 317-343

THE APPLICATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL PREAMBLES AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL RECOGNITION OF INDIGENOUS AUSTRALIANS

  • Anne Twomey (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020589313000092
  • Published online: 09 April 2013
Abstract
Abstract

The debate on the recognition of Indigenous Australians in the Australian Constitution is more about how, than whether, this should occur. The two main proposals involve the use of a preamble. One proposes symbolic recognition in a new constitutional preamble with a clause prohibiting use of the preamble in constitutional interpretation. The other would give Parliament power to make laws with respect to Indigenous Australians, but qualify it in a preamble so that it could only be exercised for their ‘advancement’. This article draws on comparative experience of the use of preambles in other common law countries to challenge the assumptions underlying each proposal.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

M-P Granger, ‘The Preamble(s) of the French Constitution: Content, Status, Uses and Amendment’ (2011) 52 Acta Juridica Hungarica 1

J Kudrna, ‘Two Preambles in the Czech Constitutional System’ (2011) 52 Acta Juridica Hungarica 25

R Piotrowski, ‘The Importance of Preamble in Constitutional Court Jurisprudence’ (2011) 52 Acta Juridica Hungarica 29

E Poplawska, ‘Preamble to the Constitution as an Expression of the New Axiology of the Republic of Poland’ (2011) 52 Acta Juridica Hungarica 40

M Silagi, ‘The Preamble of the German Grundgesetz: Constitutional Status and Importance of Preambles in German Law’, (2011) 52 Acta Juridica Hungarica 54

R Marcin, ‘“Posterity” in the Preamble and a Positivist Pro-Life Position’ (1993) 38 American Journal of Jurisprudence 273

Mark D Walters, ‘The Common Law Constitution in Canada: Return of Lex Non Scripta as Fundamental Law’ (2001) 51 University of Toronto Law Journal 91, 103

J Beardsley, ‘Constitutional Review in France’ (1975) Supreme Court Review 189, 226

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International & Comparative Law Quarterly
  • ISSN: 0020-5893
  • EISSN: 1471-6895
  • URL: /core/journals/international-and-comparative-law-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: