Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T21:29:52.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Detecting Heritage Crime(s): What We Know about Illicit Metal Detecting in England and Wales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2019

Adam Daubney  and
Louise E. Nicholas
Adam Daubney
Affiliation:
Portable Antiquities Scheme, Lincolnshire County Council, Lancaster House, Orchard Street, Lincoln, United Kingdom; Email: adam.daubney@lincolnshire.gov.uk
Louise E. Nicholas
Affiliation:
Department of Social Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom; Email: l.e.nicholas@lboro.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Metal detecting is a popular hobby in England and Wales, and, since 1997, over 1.3 million finds have been recorded by the Portable Antiquities Scheme (PAS), a scheme to encourage the voluntary recording of artifacts found by the public. The metal detector can be a useful archaeological tool when used lawfully and responsibly; however, it is also a tool that is used for illicit purposes by individuals and groups wishing to obtain artifacts from archaeological sites on which they have no permission to detect. Information on the number and nature of incidents of illicit metal detecting, however, is difficult to collate owing both to the nature of the crime and to the way it is recorded (or not) by law enforcement authorities. In this article, we examine the strengths and limitations of the available official and unofficial sources on illicit metal detecting in England and Wales and explore the potential they have to tell us about current trends in this form of heritage crime. The first unofficial source is a list of incidents reported to Historic England, which contains basic information on 276 incidents recorded between 2010 and 2017. The second source is the result of a survey of the PAS’s finds liaison officers regarding the extent to which they assisted law enforcement authorities for the years from 2015 to 2017. Both sources were then contrasted with a freedom of information request that was sent to all 49 police forces in the United Kingdom. Although there are some synergies between the unofficial and official sources, the lack of detail in any one dataset makes them of limited use in demonstrating trends in the macro- and micro-scales of time and place. Accordingly, many of the issues highlighted in this article could be resolved by devising a better system for police record keeping of metal detecting offences.

Keywords

crime datadark figure of crimeheritage crimemetal detecting
Type
Article
Information
International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , May 2019 , pp. 139 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Barford, P. 2010. “Archaeology, Collectors and Preservation: A Reply to David Gill.” Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 20: 16–23. doi:http://doi.org/10.5334/pia.335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biderman, A. D., and Reiss, A. J. Jr, 1967. “On Exploring the ‘Dark Figure’ of Crime.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 374, no. 1: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bland, R. 2005. “A Pragmatic Approach to the Problem of Portable Antiquities: The Experience in England and Wales.” Antiquity 79, no. 304: 440–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bland, R. 2009. “The United Kingdom as a Source Country: Some Problems in Regulating the Market in UK Antiquities and the Challenge of the Internet.” In Criminology and Archaeology: Studies in Looted Antiquities, edited by Mackenzie, Simon and Green, Penny, 83–102. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Brindle, T. 2014. The Portable Antiquities Scheme and Roman Britain. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Brodie, N. 2017. How to Control the Internet Market in Antiquities? The Need for Regulation and Monitoring, Antiquities Coalition Policy Brief no. 3. http://thinktank.theantiquitiescoalition.org/how-to-control-the-internet-market-in-antiquities-the-need-for-regulation-and-monitoring/ (accessed 12 March 2018).Google Scholar
Campbell, S., and Thomas, S., eds. 2013. “Portable Antiquities: Archaeology, Collecting, Metal Detecting.” Internet Archaeology 33. doi:10.11141/ia.33.12.Google Scholar
Coombes, M., Bradley, D., Grove, L., Thomas, S., and Young, C.. 2012. The Extent of Crime and Anti-Social Behaviour Facing Designated Heritage Assets. Glasgow: Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research. http://www.sccjr.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Heritage-Crime-England1.pdf (accessed 18 January 2018)Google Scholar
Daubney, A. 2016. Portable Antiquities, Palimpsests, and Persistent Places. Leiden: Sidestone Press.Google Scholar
Daubney, A. 2017. “Floating Culture: The Unrecorded Antiquities of England and Wales.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 23, no. 9: 785–99. doi:10.1080/13527258.2017.1325770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deckers, P., Dobat, A., Ferguson, N., Heeren, S., Lewis, M., and Thomas, S.. 2018. “The Complexities of Metal Detecting Policy and Practice: A Response to Samuel Hardy, ‘Quantitative Analysis of Open-Source Data on Metal Detecting for Cultural Property’ (Cogent Social Sciences 3, 2017).” Open Archaeology 4, no. 1: 322–33. doi:10.1515/opar-2018-0019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department for Culture, Media, and Sport (DCMS). 2013. Scheduled Monuments and Nationally Important but Non-Scheduled Monuments. London: DCMS. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/249695/SM_policy_statement_10-2013__2_.pdf (accessed 22 February 2018).Google Scholar
Dobinson, C., and Denison, S.. 1995. Metal Detecting and Archaeology in England. London: English Heritage / Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar
Fincham, D. 2008. “A Coordinated Legal and Policy Approach to Undiscovered Antiquities: Adapting the Cultural Heritage Policy of England and Wales to Other Nations of Origin.” International Journal of Cultural Property 15, no. 3: 347–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, D. 2010. “The Portable Antiquities Scheme and the Treasure Act: Protecting the Archaeology of England and Wales?” Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 20: 1–11. doi:10.5334/pia.333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grove, L. 2013. “Heritocide? Defining and Exploring Heritage Crime.” Public Archaeology 12, no. 4: 242–54. doi:10.1179/1465518714Z.00000000046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grove, L., Daubney, A., and Booth, A.. 2018. “Identifying Sites at Risk from Illicit Metal Detecting: From Craved to Hopper.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 24, no. 10: 1038–1052. doi:10.1080/13527258.2018.1475408. doi:10.1108/DPM-07-2018-0232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grove, L., Thomas, S., and Daubney, A.. 2018. “Fool’s Gold? A Critical Assessment of Sources of Data on Heritage Crime.” Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, S. 2017. “Quantitative Analysis of Open-Source Data on Metal Detecting for Cultural Property: Estimation of the Scale and Intensity of Metal Detecting and the Quantity of Metal-Detected Cultural Goods.” Cogent Social Sciences 3, no. 1: 1–49. doi:10.1080/23311886.2017.1298397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Historic England. 2017. Guidance for Sentencers: Heritage Crime. 1 February. https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/heritage-crime-guidance-sentencers/ (accessed online 22 February 2018).Google Scholar
Illes, A. 2016. Wildlife Crime in the United Kingdom: In-depth Analysis for the ENVI Committee. Brussels: European Parliament.Google Scholar
Johnson, D., and Hampson, E.. 2015. “Utilising the UK Freedom of Information Act 2000 for Crime Record Data: Indications of the Strength of Records Management in Day to Day Police Business.” Records Management Journal 25, no. 3: 248–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, J. 2018. “The State of Heritage and Cultural Property Policing in England and Wales, France and Italy.” European Journal of Criminology. doi:10.1177/1477370818803047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, S. D., 1998. “The Relationship between Crime Reporting and Police: Implications for the Use of Uniform Crime Reports.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 14, no. 1: 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. 2016a. “A Detectorist’s Utopia? Archaeology and Metal-Detecting in England and Wales.” Open Archaeology 2: 127–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. 2016b. The Portable Antiquities Scheme Annual Report 2016. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Oxford Archaeology. 2009. Nighthawks and Nighthawking. Damage to Archaeological Sites in the UK and Crown Dependencies Caused by Illegal Searching and Removal of Antiquities. Strategic Study Final Report. Oxford: Oxford Archaeology. http://www.helm.org.uk/guidance-library/nighthawks-nighthawking/ (accessed 30 January 2018).Google Scholar
Petrossian, G., and Clarke, R.. 2014. “Explaining and Controlling Illegal Commercial Fishing: An Application of the Craved Theft Model.” British Journal of Criminology 54, no. 1: 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelbourn, C. 2014a. “A Tale of Two Prosecutions: Prosecuting Heritage Crime in England and the United States, a Cautionary Tale.” Art, Antiquity and Law 19, no. 3: 253–64.Google Scholar
Shelbourn, C. 2014b. “Improving the Treatment of Heritage Crime in Criminal Proceedings: Towards a Better Understanding of the Impact of Heritage Offences.” In Heritage Crime: Progress, Prospects and Prevention, edited by Grove, L. and Thomas, S., 188–205. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skogan, W. G. 1977. “Dimensions of the Dark Figure of Unreported Crime.” Crime and Delinquency 23, no. 1: 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, S. 2009. “The Relationships between Archaeologists and Metal-detector Users in England and Wales: Impact of the Past and Implications for the Future.” Unpublished PhD dissertation, Newcastle University.Google Scholar
Thomas, S. 2010. “Nighthawks and Dayhawks: Heritage Thieves with Metal Detectors.” The Archaeologist 77: 16–17.Google Scholar
Thomas, S. 2012. “How STOP Started: Early Approaches to the Metal Detecting Community by Archaeologists and Others.” In Community Archaeology: Themes, Methods and Practices, edited by Moshenska, G. and Dhanjal, S., 42–57. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Thomas, S. 2013. “Editorial—Portable Antiquities: Archaeology, Collecting, Metal Detecting.” Internet Archaeology 33. doi:10.11141/ia.33.12.Google Scholar
Wilson, P., and Harrison, M.. 2013. Three years on from “The Nighthawking Survey’: innovations in heritage protection. Internet Archaeology 33. doi:10.11141/ia.33.7.Google Scholar