Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-06T03:49:08.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How do you patent a landscape? The perils of dichotomizing cultural and intellectual property

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2005

RL Barsh
Affiliation:
Native American Studies, University of Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada

Extract

For a variety of conceptual, historical, and political reasons, contemporary international law distinguishes between 'natural' land forms, cultural monuments, movable cultural property, the performing arts, and scientific knowledge. Indigenous peoples do not make these distinctions. Rather, they tend to regard landscapes as inherently cultural products in which artworks, literature, performances, and scientific-knowledge systems are inextricably embedded. Scientific knowledge must periodically be rehearsed within the landscape in recitations and performances that remember the historical process by which people and their nonhuman kinfolk constructed the landscape. Detaching specific cultural or scientific 'objects' from the landscape and commodifying them, as is contemplated by most current proposals for protecting indigenous peoples' rights, will undermine the indigenous institutions and procedures necessary for perpetuating the quality and validity of local knowledge.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The International Cultural Property Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)