Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T10:09:28.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Cultural Property to Cultural Data: The Multiple Dimensions of “Ownership” in a Global Digital Age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2014

Neil Asher Silberman
Neil Asher Silberman*
Affiliation:
Center for Heritage and Society, University of Massachusetts Amherst. Email: nasilber@anthro.umass.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The global digital environment and the continuous expansion of digital information about cultural property necessitate a reevaluation of John Henry Merryman’s tripartite typology of cultural property ideals. Merryman put forth those ideals, namely 1.) ensuring the physical preservation of cultural property, 2.) protecting its even-handed interpretation, and 3.) offering public access to cultural property, as the main bases for the settlement of international cultural property disputes. However, new questions have arisen about the status of cultural property in an era when detailed virtual copies of cultural property are instantaneously available. For example, to what extent is digitized cultural property data should itself be regarded as cultural property? This paper will address some of the ethical issues related to the physical preservation, interpretation, and access to this digitized cultural property data. It will conclude with an examination of another type of cultural heritage data: the increasing use of behavioral data about cultural property consumers and audiences as a marketing tool by cultural institutions. This ominous new turn in the commodification of cultural property, it will be suggested, identifies items of cultural significance not only as objects of ownership and sale, but also as a marketable entertainment experience.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 21 , Issue 3: SPECIAL ISSUE: Thinking About Cultural Property: The Legal and Public Policy Legacies of John Henry Merryman , August 2014 , pp. 365 - 374
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Addis, Michela. “New Technologies and Cultural Consumption—Edutainment Is Born!” European Journal of Marketing 39, no. 7/8 (2005): 729–36.Google Scholar
Addison, Alonzo C. “The Vanishing Virtual: Safeguarding Heritage’s Endangered Digital Record.” In New Heritage: New Media and Cultural Heritage, edited by Kalay, Yehuda, Affleck, Janice, and Kvan, Thomas, 27–39. Abington, UK: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar
Addison, Alonzo C. “Virtual Heritage: Technology in the Service of Culture.” In Proceedings of the 2001 Conference on Virtual Reality, Archeology, and Cultural Heritage, 343–54. VAST ’01. New York: ACM, 2001.Google Scholar
Appiah, Kwame Anthony. “Whose Culture Is It?” New York Review of Books 53, no. 2 (2006): 38.Google Scholar
Araoz, Gustavo F. “Preserving Heritage Places under a New Paradigm.” Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development 1, no. 1 (2011): 55–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltsavias, Manos, Gruen, Armin, Gool, Luc van, and Pateraki, Maria. “Recording, Modeling and Visualization of Cultural Heritage.” Proceedings of the International Workshop, Centro Stefano Franscini, Monte Verita, Ascona, Switzerland, 22–27 May 2005. London: CRC Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin. Jihad vs. McWorld: Terrorism’s Challenge to Democracy. New York: Ballantine Books, 2010.Google Scholar
Bauer, Alexander A. “New Ways of Thinking about Cultural Property: A Critical Appraisal of the Antiques Trade Debates.” Fordham International Law Journal 31 (2007): 690–724.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. UK: Penguin, 2008.Google Scholar
Boym, Svetlana. “Nostalgia and Its Discontents.” Hedgehog Review 9 (2007): 7–13.Google Scholar
Brown, Michael F. Who Owns Native Culture? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Cameron, Fiona, and Kenderdine, Sarah. Theorizing Digital Cultural Heritage: a Critical Discourse. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. http://site.ebrary.com/id/10190483 (2007; accessed 23 August 2013).Google Scholar
Ceriotti, M., Mottola, L., Picco, G. P., Murphy, A. L., Guna, S., Corra, M., Pozzi, M., Zonta, D., Zanon, P.. “Monitoring Heritage Buildings with Wireless Sensor Networks: The Torre Aquila Deployment.” In Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 277–88. IEEE Computer Society, 2009.Google Scholar
Chen, Ching-chih, Wactlar, Howard D., Wang, James Z., and Kiernan, Kevin. “Digital Imagery for Significant Cultural and Historical Materials.” International Journal of Digital Libraries 5, no. 4 (2005): 275–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Stroma. “Beyond Authenticity and Commodification.” Annals of Tourism Research 34, no. 4 (2007): 943–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuno, James. Who Owns Antiquity? Museums and the Battle over Our Ancient Heritage. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Davis, Douglas. “The Work of Art in the Age of Digital Reproduction (An Evolving Thesis: 1991–1995).” Leonardo 28, no. 5 (1995): 381–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Gruyter, Saur. Museums of the World, 19th ed. München: De Gruyter Saur, 2012.Google Scholar
Hardy, Matthew. The Venice Charter Revisited: Modernism, Conservation and Tradition in the 21st Century. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars, 2008.Google Scholar
Hedstrom, Margaret. “Digital Preservation: A Time Bomb for Digital Libraries.” Computers and the Humanities 31, no. 3(1997): 189–202.Google Scholar
Jokilehto, Jukka, Cameron, Christina, Parent, Michel, and International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS). The World Heritage List: What Is OUV?: Defining the Outstanding Universal Value of Cultural World Heritage Properties: An ICOMOS Study. Berlin/Paris: Hendrik Bässler Verlag, ICOMOS, 2008.Google Scholar
Kacyra, B. “CyArk 500–3D Documentation of 500 Important Cultural Heritage Sites.” Photogrammetric Week (2009): 315–20.Google Scholar
Katyal, Sonia. “A Third Way of thinking about Cultural Property.” Unpublished paper presented at the conference Thinking About Cultural Property: The Legal and Public Policy Legacies of John Henry Merryman, Stanford Law School, 8–9 November 2013.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Peter B. “Marketing Culture in the Digital Age A Report on New Business Collaborations Between Libraries, Museums, Archives and Commercial Companies. Intelligent Television.” http://msc.mellon.org/research-reports/MarketingCultureinDigitalAge-%20Ithaka.pdf/at_download/file (2005; accessed 13 July 2014).Google Scholar
Key, Jennifer. “Enhancing Fundraising Success with Custom Data Modelling.” International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 6, no. 4 (2001): 335–46.Google Scholar
Kotler, Neil G., Kotler, Philip, and Kotler, Wendy I.. Museum Marketing and Strategy: Designing Missions, Building Audiences, Generating Revenue and Resources. New York: Wiley, 2008.Google Scholar
Labadi, Sophia. “World Heritage, Authenticity and Post-Authenticity.” In Heritage and Globalisation, edited by Labadi, Sophia and Long, Colin, 66–84. New York: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar
La, Follette, Amelia, Laetitia. Negotiating Culture: Heritage, Ownership, and Intellectual Property. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Liu, Yang, Feng, Yu-qiang, and Shao, Zhen. “Support System for Predicting Online Auction End Prices.” Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice 29, no. 12 (2009): 134–40.Google Scholar
Lowenthal, David. The Past Is a Foreign Country. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Lindsay. Digital Heritage. New York: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Marrie, Henrietta. “The UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage and the Protection and Maintenance of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Indigenous Peoples.” Intangible Heritage: Key Issues in Cultural Heritage, edited by Smith, Laurajane and Akagawa, Natsuko, 169–92. New York: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar
Merryman, John Henry. “The Public Interest in Cultural Property.” California Law Review 77, no. 2 (1989): 339–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merryman, John Henry. “Two Ways of Thinking about Cultural Property.” American Journal of International Law 80, no. 4 (1986): 831–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pine, B. Joseph, and Gilmore, James H. The Experience Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Ronchi, Alfredo M. eCulture: Cultural Content in the Digital Age. New York: Springer, 2009.Google Scholar
Stovel, Herb. “Origins and Influence of the Nara Document on Authenticity.” APT Bulletin 38, no. 2/3(2008): 9–17.Google Scholar
Turow, Joseph. The Daily You—How the Advertising Industry Is Defining: Your Identity and Your Worth. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Zorich, Diane M. “A Survey of Digital Cultural Heritage Initiatives and Their Sustainability Concerns.” Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington, DC. http://www.sinica.edu.tw/∼ndaplib/service/ebook/pub118.pdf (2003; accessed 16 February 2014).Google Scholar