Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T03:19:13.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Prevalence of Alcohol Prevention Efforts in Swedish Workplaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2013

Håkan Källmén*
Affiliation:
STAD — Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Håkan Leifman
Affiliation:
Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and Other Drugs (CAN), Sweden
Ulric Hermansson
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Center for Dependency Disorders, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Stig Vinberg
Affiliation:
Mid Sweden University, Sweden
*
Address for correspondence: Håkan Källmén, Centre for Psychiatry ResearchKarolinska Institutet/Stockholm Countycouncil Box 6031 102 31StockholmSweden. E-mail: hakan.kallmen@sll.se

Abstract

This article presents results from a survey aimed at identifying the extent of alcohol prevention efforts in Swedish workplaces focusing on the dissemination of a model for secondary prevention — the ‘Risk Drinking model’. From a random sample of 929 human resource managers at Swedish workplaces, 374 answered a web-based questionnaire (response rate = 40%). Results showed that about 70% had an alcohol policy at their workplace, 51% were engaged in alcohol prevention efforts and about 19% used the Risk Drinking model. Regression analyses showed that large workplaces, workplaces where employees received training on alcohol, public sector and female-dominated workplaces were significantly associated with alcohol prevention activities. We conclude that training is important for the implementation of alcohol prevention at Swedish workplaces, and is of particular importance in small enterprises.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Australian Academic Press Pty Ltd 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amaro, H., Ahl, M., Matsumoto, A., Prado, G., Mulé, C., Kemmemer, A.,. . . Mantella, P. (2009). Trial of the University Assistance Program for alcohol use among mandated students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 16, 4561.Google Scholar
Bergman, H., & Källmen, H. (2002). Alcohol use among Swedes and a psychometric evaluation of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Alcohol and Alcoholism, 37, 245251.Google Scholar
Babor, T., Caetano, R., Casswell, S., Edwards, G., Giesbrecht, N., Graham, K., . . . Rossow, I. (2010). Alcohol: No ordinary commodity: Research and public policy. London, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eurofound (2012). Fifth European working conditions survey. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Frick, K., Langaa Jensen, P., Quinlan, M., & Wilthagen, T. (2000). Systematic occupational health and safety management. Oxford, England: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Guldbrandsson, K. (2007). Från nyhet till vardagsnytta. Om implementeringens mödosamma konst. (From news to everyday use. About the art of implementation). Östersund: Statens folkhälsoinstitut (Swedish National Institute of Public Health).Google Scholar
Helander, A. (2003). Biological markers in alcoholism. Journal of Neural Transmission, 66(Suppl.), 1532.Google Scholar
Hermansson, U. (2004). Riskbruk av alkohol i arbetslivet. En kunskapsöversikt om motiv och åtgärder. (Risky use of alcohol in worklife. A review about motivation and prevention). Stockholm, Sweden: CAN & SAD.Google Scholar
Hermansson, U., Helander, A., Brandt, L., Huss, A., & Ronnberg, S. (2010). Screening and brief intervention for risky alcohol consumption in the workplace: results of a 1-year randomized controlled study. Alcohol Alcohol, 45 (3), 252257.Google Scholar
Hermansson, U., Knutsson, A., Rönnberg, S., & Brandt, L. (1998). Feasibility of Brief Intervention in the Workplace for the Detection and Treatment of Excessive Alcohol Consumption. International Journal of Occupational Environmental Health, 4, 7178.Google Scholar
Källmen, H., & Leifman, H. (2009). Alna-utbildning ger mer alkoholprevention? — en jämförelse av alkoholpreventiva insatser rapporterade av utbildad och outbildad personal. (Alna-training leads to more alcoholprevention? — A comparison of alcohol preventive measures reported by trained and untrained staff.) Socialmedicinsk tidskrift, 86, 167173.Google Scholar
Ramstedt, M. (2010) Change and stability? Trends in alcohol consumption, harms and policy: Sweden 1990–2010. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. 27 (5), 409423.Google Scholar
Richmond, R., Kehoe, L., Heather, N., & Wodak, A. (2000). Evaluation of a Workplace Brief Intervention for Excessive Alcohol Consumption: The Workscreen Project. Preventive Medicine, 30, 5163.Google Scholar
Salonsalmi, A., Laaksonen, M., Lahelma, E., & Rahkonen, O. (2009). Drinking habits and sickness absence: The contribution of working conditions. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 37, 846854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, G. S., & Kraus, J. F. (1988). Alcohol and residential, recreational, and occupational injuries: a review of the epidemiologic evidence. Annual Review of Public Health, 9, 99121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Socialstyrelsen (The National Board of Health and Welfare). (2007). Nationella riktlinjer för missbruks- och beroendevård (National directions for addictive and dependency care). Stockholm, Sweden: Author.Google Scholar
Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment. (2001). Behandling av alkohol och narkotikaproblem. En evidensbaserad kunskapssammanställning (Treatment of alcohol and drug problems. An evidence-based review). Stockholm, Sweden: Author.Google Scholar
Swedish Work Environment Authority. (2012). The Work Environment 2011. Stockholm, Sweden: Author.Google Scholar
Webb, G., Shakeshaft, A., Sanson-Fisher, R., & Havard, A. (2009). A systematic review of work-place interventions for alcohol-related problems. Addiction, 104, 365377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed