Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 20
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Benson, Jacquelyn J. and Coleman, Marilyn 2016. Older Adults Developing a Preference for Living Apart Together. Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 78, Issue. 3, p. 797.

    Thomas, Michael J. and Mulder, Clara H. 2016. Partnership patterns and homeownership: a cross-country comparison of Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Housing Studies, p. 1.

    Benson, Jacquelyn J. 2015. The Encyclopedia of Adulthood and Aging.

    Duncan, Simon 2015. Women's agency in living apart together: constraint, strategy and vulnerability. The Sociological Review, Vol. 63, Issue. 3, p. 589.

    Jurkane-Hobein, Iveta 2015. Do I Qualify for a Love Relationship? Social Norms and Long-Distance Relationships in Post-Soviet Latvia. Sexuality & Culture, Vol. 19, Issue. 2, p. 388.

    KOREN, CHAYA 2015. The intertwining of second couplehood and old age. Ageing and Society, Vol. 35, Issue. 09, p. 1864.

    Liefbroer, Aart C. Poortman, Anne-Rigt and Seltzer, Judith 2015. Why do intimate partners live apart? Evidence on LAT relationships across Europe. Demographic Research, Vol. 32, p. 251.

    Lyssens-Danneboom, Vicky and Mortelmans, Dimitri 2015. Living apart together: Longing for the couple, enjoying being single. Family Science, Vol. 6, Issue. 1, p. 11.

    Pasteels, Inge Lyssens-Danneboom, Vicky and Mortelmans, Dimitri 2015. A Life Course Perspective on Living Apart Together: Meaning and Incidence Across Europe. Social Indicators Research,

    Upton-Davis, Karen 2015. Subverting gendered norms of cohabitation: Living Apart Together for women over 45. Journal of Gender Studies, Vol. 24, Issue. 1, p. 104.

    Finkel, Eli J. Hui, Chin Ming Carswell, Kathleen L. and Larson, Grace M. 2014. The Suffocation of Marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow Without Enough Oxygen. Psychological Inquiry, Vol. 25, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Koren, Chaya 2014. Together and apart: a typology of re-partnering in old age. International Psychogeriatrics, Vol. 26, Issue. 08, p. 1327.

    Lyssens-Danneboom, Vicky and Mortelmans, Dimitri 2014. Living Apart Together and Money: New Partnerships, Traditional Gender Roles. Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 76, Issue. 5, p. 949.

    Tai, Tsui-o Baxter, Janeen and Hewitt, Belinda 2014. Do co-residence and intentions make a difference? Relationship satisfaction in married, cohabiting, and living apart together couples in four countries. Demographic Research, Vol. 31, p. 71.

    Demey, Dieter Berrington, Ann Evandrou, Maria and Falkingham, Jane 2013. Pathways into living alone in mid-life: Diversity and policy implications. Advances in Life Course Research, Vol. 18, Issue. 3, p. 161.

    Ayuso, Luis 2012. <i>Living Apart Together</i> en España. ¿Noviazgos o parejas independientes?. Revista Internacional de Sociología, Vol. 70, Issue. 3, p. 587.

    Upton-Davis, Karen 2012. Living Apart Together Relationships (LAT): Severing Intimacy from Obligation. Gender Issues, Vol. 29, Issue. 1-4, p. 25.

    Duncan, Simon and Phillips, Miranda 2011. People who live apart together (LATs): new family form or just a stage?. International Review of Sociology, Vol. 21, Issue. 3, p. 513.

    Duncan, Simon and Phillips, Miranda 2010. People who live apart together (LATs) - how different are they?. The Sociological Review, Vol. 58, Issue. 1, p. 112.

    Strohm, Charles Seltzer, Judith Cochran, Susan and Mays, Vickie 2009. "Living Apart Together": Relationships in the United States. Demographic Research, Vol. 21, p. 177.

  • International Journal of Law in Context, Volume 2, Issue 1
  • March 2006, pp. 37-48

Living-apart-together in Britain: context and meaning

  • John Haskey (a1) and Jane Lewis (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 31 May 2006

The article draws on two Office of National Statistics’ Omnibus sample surveys to provide the demographic context for living-apart-together.The Omnibus sample surveys for this project were funded by the ONS and by the ESRC (grant no. L326253054). The ESRC grant also supported the qualitative research, and we are grateful to Sophie Sarre and Jennifer Burton, who organised and undertook the interviews. The second part of the paper begins to explore the meanings of this form of partnership through interviews conducted with a sub-sample of respondents to the second survey, conducted in April 2004. The exploratory study complicates our understanding of the range of partnership statuses, which in turn has implications for policymakers grappling with whether and how to regulate different statuses in different ways. We conclude that living-apart-together is a significant form of partnership in Britain, and that it may take place at different points in the lifecourse. We explore the idea that this form of partnership further signals the spread of ‘selfish individualism’ and a ‘flight from commitment’. We find instead that living-apart-together represents a different kind of shared life to those involved from that they perceive to characterise co-residential relationships.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Law in Context
  • ISSN: 1744-5523
  • EISSN: 1744-5531
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-law-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *