Skip to main content

Making paradoxes invisible: international law as an autopoietic system

  • Kenneth Kang (a1)

When a state claims its practices are lawful but at the same time another claims this unlawful, a paradox emerges. Legal indeterminacy becomes the ordinary rule, while the resolution of disputes is designated the exception. To illustrate how international law deals with paradoxes, this paper will employ the dichotomy of upstream–downstream trans-boundary interstate relations. Here the paradox arises, since upstream states traditionally advocate for the free utilisation of water within their territory, while downstream states instead advocate for the waters full continued flow. Although, from a logical perspective, such a paradox would typically be viewed as something negative, from a social perspective, paradoxes also draw attention to the frames of common sense. Indeed, by employing a Luhmannian-inspired theoretical framework, this paper proposes that, through a sociological understanding of paradoxes, one can more adequately rediscover and reconceptualise the manner in which international law institutionalises conflicting expectations into a more harmless, bounded and permitted contradiction.

Corresponding author
Hide All

I would like to thank Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Tom Webb, Bald de Vries, Patricia Wouters, Sergei Vinogradov, Huiping Chen, Huaqun Zeng and the China International Water Law research group for their support and encouragement during the course of this research. I would also like to make a very special thank you to Cedric Gilson, Owen Mcintyre, David Devlaeminck and the anonymous reviewers for their detailed and invaluable comments made on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Hide All
Barry John (2004) ‘From Environmental Politics to the Politics of the Environment: The Pacification and Normalization of Environmentalism?’ in Levy Yoram and Wissenburg Marcel (eds) Liberal Democracy and Environmentalism: The End of Environmentalism? London: Routledge, 179192.
Bergthaller Hannes (2014) ‘On the Limits of Agency: Notes on the Material Turn from a Systems-Theoretical Perspective’ in Lovino Serenella and Oppermann Serpil (eds) Material Ecocriticism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 3750.
Bernstorff Jochen Von (2006) ‘Sisyphus Was an International Lawyer: On Martti Koskenniemi's “From Apology to Utopia” and the Place of Law in International Politics’, German Law Journal 7(12): 10151036.
Blomley Nicholas (1994) Law, Space, and the Geographies of Power. New York: Guilford Press.
Borch Christian (2011) Niklas Luhmann (Key Sociologists). Oxon: Routledge.
Bostian Ida (1998) ‘Flushing the Danube: The World Court's Decision Concerning the Gabcikovo Dam’, Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy 9(2): 401427.
Commoner Barry (1971) The Closing Circle: Nature, Man, and Technology. New York: Knopf.
D'Amato Anthony (2005) ‘International Law as an Autopoietic System’ in Wolfrum Rudiger and Roben Volker (eds) Developments of International Law in Treaty Making. Berlin: Springer, 335399.
D'Amato Anthony (2009) ‘Softness in International Law: A Self-Serving Quest for New Legal Materials: A Reply to Jean d'Aspremont’, European Journal of International Law 20(3): 10571093.
D'Amato Anthony (2014) ‘Groundwork for International Law’, American Journal of International Law 108(4): 650679.
Deleuze Gilles (1990) The Logic of Sense, trans. Lester Mark and Stivale Charles. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ellis Jaye (2009) ‘Sustainable Development and Fragmentation in International Society’, Working Paper Series, McGill University, pp. 124.
Eslava Luis and Pahuja Sundhya (2012) ‘Beyond the (Post)Colonial: TWAIL and the Everyday Life of International Law’, Journal of Law and Politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America [Verfassung und Recht in Übersee] 45(2): 195221.
Fischer-Lescano Andreas (2007) ‘Global Constitutional Struggles: Human Rights between colère publique and colère politique’ in Kaleck Wolfgang, Ratner Michael, Singelnstein Tobias and Weiss Peter (eds) International Prosecution of Human Rights Crimes. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1327.
Fischer-Lescano Andreas and Teubner Gunther (2004) ‘Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Globlal Law’, Michigan Journal of International Law 25(4): 9991046.
Friedman Thomas L. (2006) The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Guski Roman (2013) ‘Autonomy as Sovereignty: On Teubner's Constitutionalization of Transnational Function Regimes’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 11(2): 523536.
Halsey Mark (2011) ‘Majesty and Monstrosity: Deleuze and the Defence of Nature’ in Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos Andreas (ed.) Law and Ecology: New Environmental Foundations. Oxon: Routledge, 214236.
Hofstadter Douglas R. (1979) Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. New York: Random House.
Kang Kenneth (2017) ‘Making Use of Paradoxes: Law, Transboundary Hydropower Dams and Beyond the Technical’, Law and Critique: 122.
Kessler Oliver and Kratochwill Friedrich (2013) ‘Functional Differentiation and the Oughts and Musts of International Law’ in Albert Mathias, Buzan Barry and Zuern Michael (eds) Bringing Sociology to International Relations: World Politics as Differentiation Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 159181.
King Michael and Thornhill Chris (2003) Niklas Luhmann's Theory of Politics and Law. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Koskenniemi Martti (1989) From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Helsinki: Finnish Lawyers’ Pub. Co.
Koskenniemi Martti (2001) The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Koskenniemi Martti (2005) From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koskenniemi Martti (2009) ‘Miserable Comforters: International Relations as New Natural Law’, European Journal of International Relations 15(3): 395422.
Lee Jing (2013) ‘The Preservation of Freshwater Ecosystems of International Watercourses and the Integration of Rules: An Interpretative Mechanism’, Water International 38(2): 156165.
Lier Irene van (1980) Acid Rain and International Law. Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff & Noordhoff.
Luhmann Niklas (1969) Legitimation durch Verfahren [Legitimation by Procedures]. Auflage: Frankfurt am Main.
Luhmann Niklas (1987) Archimedes und wir: Interviews [Archimedes and Us: Interviews]. Berlin: Merve Verlag.
Luhmann Niklas (1989) Ecological Communication. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Luhmann Niklas (1992) ‘The Concept of Society’, Thesis Eleven 31(1): 6780.
Luhmann Niklas (1993) Risk: A Sociological Theory, trans. Barret R. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Luhmann Niklas (1995a) Das recht der gesellschaft [The Right of Society] . Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Luhmann Niklas (1995b) ‘Legal Argumentation: An Analysis of Its Form’, Modern Law Review 58(3): 285298.
Luhmann Niklas (1997) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft [The Company Society]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Luhmann Niklas (2000a) Organisation und Entscheidung [Organisation and Decision]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Luhmann Niklas (2000b) The Reality of the Mass Media, trans. Cross Kathleen. Stanford: Stanford University Press
Luhmann Niklas (2004) Law as a Social System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Luhmann Niklas (2006) ‘System as Difference’, Organization 13(1): 3757.
Luhmann Niklas (2008) ‘Are There Still Indispensable Norms in Our Society?’, Soziale Systeme 14(1): 1837.
Mattheis Clemens (2012) ‘The System Theory of Niklas Luhmann and the Constitutionalization of the World Society’, Goettingen Journal of International Law 4(2): 625647.
McAfee Kathleen (1999) ‘Selling Nature to Save It? Biodiversity and Green Developmentalism’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 17(2): 133154.
Mcintyre Owen (2007) Environmental Protection of International Watercourses under International Law. Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate.
Mcintyre Owen (2010) ‘The Proceduralisation and Growing Maturity of International Water Law Case Concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v Uruguay), International Court of Justice, 20 April 2010’, Journal of Environmental Law 22(3): 475497.
Moeller Hans-Georg (2005) Luhmann Explained: From Souls to Systems. Chicago/La Salle: Open Court Publishing.
Orford Anne (2006) International Law and Its Others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paulus Andreas (2011) ‘Reciprocity Revisited’ in Fastenrath Ulrich, Geiger Rudolf, Khan Daniel-Erasmus, Paulus Andreas, von Schorlemer Sabine and Vedder Christoph (eds) From Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honour of Bruno Simma. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 113137.
Peña Alejandro M. (2015) ‘Governing Differentiation: On Standardisation as Political Steering’, European Journal of International Relations 21(1): 5275.
Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos Andreas (2009) Niklas Luhmann: Law, Justice, Society Nomikoi Critical Legal Thinkers. Abingdon: Routledge.
Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos Andreas (2013a) ‘Critical Autopoiesis and the Materiality of Law’, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 27(2): 389418.
Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos Andreas (2013b) ‘The Autopoietic Fold: Critical Autopoiesis between Luhmann and Deleuze’ in La Cour Anders and Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos Andreas (eds) Luhmann Observed: Radical Theoretical Encounters. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 6084.
Simma Bruno (1984) ‘Reciprocity’ in Bernhardt Rudolf (ed.) History of International Law, Foundations and Principles of International Law, Sources of International Law, Law of Treaties. Amsterdam/New York/Oxford: North-Holland Publishing Co., 400404.
Tarlock Dan (2004) ‘Is There a There in Environmental Law?’, Journal of Land Use 19(2): 213254.
Teubner Gunther (2001a) ‘Alienating Justice: On the Surplus Value of the Twelfth Camel’ in Nelken David and Pribán Jirí (eds) Law's New Boundaries: The Consequences of Legal Autopoiesis. London: Ashgate, 2144.
Teubner Gunther (2001b) ‘Economics of Gift – Positivity of Justice: The Mutual Paranoia of Jacques Derrida and Niklas Luhmann’, Theory, Culture & Society 18(1): 2947.
Teubner Gunther (2006) ‘Rights of Non-Humans? Electronic Agents and Animals as New Actors in Politics and Law’, Journal of Law and Society 33(4): 497521.
Teubner Gunther (2012) Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tremblay Hugo (2011) ‘A Clash of Paradigms in the Water Sector? Tensions and Synergies between Integrated Water Resources Management and the Human Rights-Based Approach to Development’, Natural Resources Journal 51(2): 307356.
UNEP (2006) Challenges to International Waters: Regional Assessments in a Global Perspective. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme.
Vandenberghe Frédéric (1999) ‘Obituary. Niklas Luhmann (1927–1998)’, Radical Philosophy 94: 5456.
Verschraegen Gert (2002) ‘Human Rights and Modern Society: A Sociological Analysis from the Perspective of Systems Theory’, Journal of Law and Society 29(2): 258281.
Whiteside Kerry H. (2006) Precautionary Politics: Principle and Practice in Confronting Environmental Risk. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Zumbansen Peer (2001) ‘Die Vergangene Zukunft des Völkerrechts’ [‘The Past Future of International Law’]. Kritische Justiz [Critical Justice] 34(1): 4669.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Law in Context
  • ISSN: 1744-5523
  • EISSN: 1744-5531
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-law-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 57 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 928 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 21st June 2017 - 23rd January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.