Skip to main content Accessibility help

Making paradoxes invisible: international law as an autopoietic system

  • Kenneth Kang (a1)


When a state claims its practices are lawful but at the same time another claims this unlawful, a paradox emerges. Legal indeterminacy becomes the ordinary rule, while the resolution of disputes is designated the exception. To illustrate how international law deals with paradoxes, this paper will employ the dichotomy of upstream–downstream trans-boundary interstate relations. Here the paradox arises, since upstream states traditionally advocate for the free utilisation of water within their territory, while downstream states instead advocate for the waters full continued flow. Although, from a logical perspective, such a paradox would typically be viewed as something negative, from a social perspective, paradoxes also draw attention to the frames of common sense. Indeed, by employing a Luhmannian-inspired theoretical framework, this paper proposes that, through a sociological understanding of paradoxes, one can more adequately rediscover and reconceptualise the manner in which international law institutionalises conflicting expectations into a more harmless, bounded and permitted contradiction.


Corresponding author


Hide All

I would like to thank Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Tom Webb, Bald de Vries, Patricia Wouters, Sergei Vinogradov, Huiping Chen, Huaqun Zeng and the China International Water Law research group for their support and encouragement during the course of this research. I would also like to make a very special thank you to Cedric Gilson, Owen Mcintyre, David Devlaeminck and the anonymous reviewers for their detailed and invaluable comments made on earlier versions of this manuscript.



Hide All
Barry, John (2004) ‘From Environmental Politics to the Politics of the Environment: The Pacification and Normalization of Environmentalism?’ in Levy, Yoram and Wissenburg, Marcel (eds) Liberal Democracy and Environmentalism: The End of Environmentalism? London: Routledge, 179192.
Bergthaller, Hannes (2014) ‘On the Limits of Agency: Notes on the Material Turn from a Systems-Theoretical Perspective’ in Lovino, Serenella and Oppermann, Serpil (eds) Material Ecocriticism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 3750.
Bernstorff, Jochen Von (2006) ‘Sisyphus Was an International Lawyer: On Martti Koskenniemi's “From Apology to Utopia” and the Place of Law in International Politics’, German Law Journal 7(12): 10151036.
Blomley, Nicholas (1994) Law, Space, and the Geographies of Power. New York: Guilford Press.
Borch, Christian (2011) Niklas Luhmann (Key Sociologists). Oxon: Routledge.
Bostian, Ida (1998) ‘Flushing the Danube: The World Court's Decision Concerning the Gabcikovo Dam’, Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy 9(2): 401427.
Commoner, Barry (1971) The Closing Circle: Nature, Man, and Technology. New York: Knopf.
D'Amato, Anthony (2005) ‘International Law as an Autopoietic System’ in Wolfrum, Rudiger and Roben, Volker (eds) Developments of International Law in Treaty Making. Berlin: Springer, 335399.
D'Amato, Anthony (2009) ‘Softness in International Law: A Self-Serving Quest for New Legal Materials: A Reply to Jean d'Aspremont’, European Journal of International Law 20(3): 10571093.
D'Amato, Anthony (2014) ‘Groundwork for International Law’, American Journal of International Law 108(4): 650679.
Deleuze, Gilles (1990) The Logic of Sense, trans. Lester, Mark and Stivale, Charles. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ellis, Jaye (2009) ‘Sustainable Development and Fragmentation in International Society’, Working Paper Series, McGill University, pp. 124.
Eslava, Luis and Pahuja, Sundhya (2012) ‘Beyond the (Post)Colonial: TWAIL and the Everyday Life of International Law’, Journal of Law and Politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America [Verfassung und Recht in Übersee] 45(2): 195221.
Fischer-Lescano, Andreas (2007) ‘Global Constitutional Struggles: Human Rights between colère publique and colère politique’ in Kaleck, Wolfgang, Ratner, Michael, Singelnstein, Tobias and Weiss, Peter (eds) International Prosecution of Human Rights Crimes. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1327.
Fischer-Lescano, Andreas and Teubner, Gunther (2004) ‘Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Globlal Law’, Michigan Journal of International Law 25(4): 9991046.
Friedman, Thomas L. (2006) The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Guski, Roman (2013) ‘Autonomy as Sovereignty: On Teubner's Constitutionalization of Transnational Function Regimes’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 11(2): 523536.
Halsey, Mark (2011) ‘Majesty and Monstrosity: Deleuze and the Defence of Nature’ in Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Andreas (ed.) Law and Ecology: New Environmental Foundations. Oxon: Routledge, 214236.
Hofstadter, Douglas R. (1979) Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. New York: Random House.
Kang, Kenneth (2017) ‘Making Use of Paradoxes: Law, Transboundary Hydropower Dams and Beyond the Technical’, Law and Critique: 122.
Kessler, Oliver and Kratochwill, Friedrich (2013) ‘Functional Differentiation and the Oughts and Musts of International Law’ in Albert, Mathias, Buzan, Barry and Zuern, Michael (eds) Bringing Sociology to International Relations: World Politics as Differentiation Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 159181.
King, Michael and Thornhill, Chris (2003) Niklas Luhmann's Theory of Politics and Law. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Koskenniemi, Martti (1989) From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Helsinki: Finnish Lawyers’ Pub. Co.
Koskenniemi, Martti (2001) The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Koskenniemi, Martti (2005) From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koskenniemi, Martti (2009) ‘Miserable Comforters: International Relations as New Natural Law’, European Journal of International Relations 15(3): 395422.
Lee, Jing (2013) ‘The Preservation of Freshwater Ecosystems of International Watercourses and the Integration of Rules: An Interpretative Mechanism’, Water International 38(2): 156165.
Lier, Irene van (1980) Acid Rain and International Law. Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff & Noordhoff.
Luhmann, Niklas (1969) Legitimation durch Verfahren [Legitimation by Procedures]. Auflage: Frankfurt am Main.
Luhmann, Niklas (1987) Archimedes und wir: Interviews [Archimedes and Us: Interviews]. Berlin: Merve Verlag.
Luhmann, Niklas (1989) Ecological Communication. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Luhmann, Niklas (1992) ‘The Concept of Society’, Thesis Eleven 31(1): 6780.
Luhmann, Niklas (1993) Risk: A Sociological Theory, trans. Barret, R. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Luhmann, Niklas (1995a) Das recht der gesellschaft [The Right of Society]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Luhmann, Niklas (1995b) ‘Legal Argumentation: An Analysis of Its Form’, Modern Law Review 58(3): 285298.
Luhmann, Niklas (1997) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft [The Company Society]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Luhmann, Niklas (2000a) Organisation und Entscheidung [Organisation and Decision]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Luhmann, Niklas (2000b) The Reality of the Mass Media, trans. Cross, Kathleen. Stanford: Stanford University Press
Luhmann, Niklas (2004) Law as a Social System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Luhmann, Niklas (2006) ‘System as Difference’, Organization 13(1): 3757.
Luhmann, Niklas (2008) ‘Are There Still Indispensable Norms in Our Society?’, Soziale Systeme 14(1): 1837.
Mattheis, Clemens (2012) ‘The System Theory of Niklas Luhmann and the Constitutionalization of the World Society’, Goettingen Journal of International Law 4(2): 625647.
McAfee, Kathleen (1999) ‘Selling Nature to Save It? Biodiversity and Green Developmentalism’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 17(2): 133154.
Mcintyre, Owen (2007) Environmental Protection of International Watercourses under International Law. Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate.
Mcintyre, Owen (2010) ‘The Proceduralisation and Growing Maturity of International Water Law Case Concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v Uruguay), International Court of Justice, 20 April 2010’, Journal of Environmental Law 22(3): 475497.
Moeller, Hans-Georg (2005) Luhmann Explained: From Souls to Systems. Chicago/La Salle: Open Court Publishing.
Orford, Anne (2006) International Law and Its Others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paulus, Andreas (2011) ‘Reciprocity Revisited’ in Fastenrath, Ulrich, Geiger, Rudolf, Khan, Daniel-Erasmus, Paulus, Andreas, von Schorlemer, Sabine and Vedder, Christoph (eds) From Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honour of Bruno Simma. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 113137.
Peña, Alejandro M. (2015) ‘Governing Differentiation: On Standardisation as Political Steering’, European Journal of International Relations 21(1): 5275.
Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Andreas (2009) Niklas Luhmann: Law, Justice, Society Nomikoi Critical Legal Thinkers. Abingdon: Routledge.
Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Andreas (2013a) ‘Critical Autopoiesis and the Materiality of Law’, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 27(2): 389418.
Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Andreas (2013b) ‘The Autopoietic Fold: Critical Autopoiesis between Luhmann and Deleuze’ in La Cour, Anders and Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Andreas (eds) Luhmann Observed: Radical Theoretical Encounters. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 6084.
Simma, Bruno (1984) ‘Reciprocity’ in Bernhardt, Rudolf (ed.) History of International Law, Foundations and Principles of International Law, Sources of International Law, Law of Treaties. Amsterdam/New York/Oxford: North-Holland Publishing Co., 400404.
Tarlock, Dan (2004) ‘Is There a There in Environmental Law?’, Journal of Land Use 19(2): 213254.
Teubner, Gunther (2001a) ‘Alienating Justice: On the Surplus Value of the Twelfth Camel’ in Nelken, David and Pribán, Jirí (eds) Law's New Boundaries: The Consequences of Legal Autopoiesis. London: Ashgate, 2144.
Teubner, Gunther (2001b) ‘Economics of Gift – Positivity of Justice: The Mutual Paranoia of Jacques Derrida and Niklas Luhmann’, Theory, Culture & Society 18(1): 2947.
Teubner, Gunther (2006) ‘Rights of Non-Humans? Electronic Agents and Animals as New Actors in Politics and Law’, Journal of Law and Society 33(4): 497521.
Teubner, Gunther (2012) Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tremblay, Hugo (2011) ‘A Clash of Paradigms in the Water Sector? Tensions and Synergies between Integrated Water Resources Management and the Human Rights-Based Approach to Development’, Natural Resources Journal 51(2): 307356.
UNEP (2006) Challenges to International Waters: Regional Assessments in a Global Perspective. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme.
Vandenberghe, Frédéric (1999) ‘Obituary. Niklas Luhmann (1927–1998)’, Radical Philosophy 94: 5456.
Verschraegen, Gert (2002) ‘Human Rights and Modern Society: A Sociological Analysis from the Perspective of Systems Theory’, Journal of Law and Society 29(2): 258281.
Whiteside, Kerry H. (2006) Precautionary Politics: Principle and Practice in Confronting Environmental Risk. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Zumbansen, Peer (2001) ‘Die Vergangene Zukunft des Völkerrechts’ [‘The Past Future of International Law’]. Kritische Justiz [Critical Justice] 34(1): 4669.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Making paradoxes invisible: international law as an autopoietic system

  • Kenneth Kang (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.