Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

The right to legal agency: domination, disability and the protections of Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

  • Anna Arstein-Kerslake (a1) and Eilionóir Flynn (a2)
Abstract

Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities has created a revolution in legal-capacity law reform. It protects the right to exercise legal agency for people with disabilities with more clarity than any prior human rights instrument. This paper explores what constitutes an exercise of legal agency and what exactly Article 12 protects. It proposes a definition of legal agency and applies it to the lived experience of cognitive disability. It also uses a republican theory of domination to argue that people with cognitive disabilities who are experiencing domination are forced to assert legal agency in even daily decision-making because of the high level of external regulation of their lives and the ever-present threat of others substituting their decision-making. It identifies Article 12 as a tool for protecting such exertions of legal agency and curtailing relationships of domination.

Copyright
Corresponding author
anna.arstein@unimelb.edu.au
Footnotes
Hide All
The development of the ideas in this article was a collaborative effort and could not have been achieved without the valuable insights and feedback of many other scholars in this field. We wish to particularly acknowledge the comments of Tina Minkowitz, Elizabeth Kamundia, Piers Gooding, Michelle Browning, Alex Ruck-Keene, Kristijan Gordan, Mirriam Nthenge, Theresia Degener, and Lucy Series for their comments on earlier versions of this paper. Alberto Vasquez, Sarah Hofmayer, Charlotte May Simera, Liz Brosnan and John Danaher also gave valuable feedback at a roundtable discussion on a very early draft of this paper. Any errors or inaccuracies are the sole responsibility of the authors.
Footnotes
References
Hide All
Anscombe, Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret (1957) Intention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Arstein-Kerslake, Anna (2014) ‘An Empowering Dependency: Exploring Support for the Exercise of Legal Capacity’, Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 18(1): 7792.
Arstein-Kerslake, Anna and Flynn, Eilionóir (2016) ‘The General Comment in Article 12 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: A Roadmap for Equality before the Law’, International Journal of Human Rights 20(4): 471490.
Bach, Michael and Kerzner, Lana (2010) A New Paradigm for Protecting Autonomy and the Right to Legal Capacity. Ontario: Law Commission of Ontario.
Brammer, Alison (2012) ‘Inside the Court of Protection’, Journal of Adult Protection 14(6): 297301.
Bratman, Michael (1999) Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bratman, Michael E. (1990) ‘What Is Intention?’ in Cohen, Philip R., Morgan, Jerry L. and Pollack, Martha E. (eds) Intentions in Communication. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1532.
Brosnan, Liz and Flynn, Eilionóir (2017) ‘Freedom to Negotiate: A Proposal Extricating “Capacity” From “Consent”’, International Journal of Law in Context 13(1), 5876.
Chappell, Anne Louise, Goodley, Dan and Lawthom, Rebecca (2001) ‘Making Connections: The Relevance of the Social Model of Disability for People with Learning Difficulties’, British Journal of Learning Disabilities 29(2): 4550.
Charlton, James I. (1998) Nothing about Us without Us: Disability Oppression and Empowerment. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
Cohen, Philip R. and Levesque, Hector J. (1990) ‘Intention Is Choice with Commitment’, Artificial Intelligence 42(2): 213261.
Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2014) General Comment No. 1 – Article 12: Equal Recognition Before the Law, UN Doc. No. CRPD/C/GC/1, adopted at the 11th Session.
de Bhailís, Clíona and Flynn, Eilionóir (2017) ‘Recognising Legal Capacity: Commentary & Analysis of Article 12 CRPD’, International Journal of Law in Context 13(1), 621.
De Wispelaere, Jurgen and Casassas, David (2014) ‘A Life of One's Own: Republican Freedom and Disability’, Disability & Society 29(3): 24022416.
Dhanda, Amita (2006–2007) ‘Legal Capacity in the Disability Rights Convention: Stranglehold of the Past or Lodestar of the Future?’, Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce 34: 429462.
Edwards, J.L.J. (1958) ‘Automatism and Criminal Responsibility’, Modern Law Review 21(4): 375386.
Flynn, Eilionóir and Arstein-Kerslake, Anna (2014) ‘Legislating Personhood: Realising the Right to Support in Exercising Legal Capacity’, International Journal of Law in Context 10(1): 81104.
Gooding, Piers (2015) ‘Navigating the “Flashing Amber Lights” of the Right to Legal Capacity in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Responding to Major Concerns’, Human Rights Law Review 15(1): 4571.
Griffith, Gemma, Hutchinson, Lisa and Hastings, Richard (2013) ‘“I'm Not a Patient, I'm a Person”: The Experiences of Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities and Challenging Behavior – a Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Studies’, Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 20(4): 469488.
Kanter, Arlene S. (2012) ‘There's No Place Like Home: The Right to Live in the Community for People with Disabilities, Under International Law and the Domestic Laws of the United States and Israel’, Israel Law Review 45(2): 181233.
Kayess, Rosemary and French, Philip (2008) ‘Out of Darkness into Light? Introducing the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’, Human Rights Law Review 8(1): 134.
Kittay, Eva Feder (1999) Love's Labor: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependency. London: Routledge.
Kittay, Eva Feder and Carlson, Licia (eds) (2010) Cognitive Disability and Its Challenge to Moral Philosophy. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
Lehman, Jeffrey and Phelps, Shirelle (2005) West's Encyclopedia of American Law. Detroit: Thomson/Gale.
Lo, Bernard (1990) ‘Assessing Decision-Making Capacity’, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 18(3): 193201.
Lovett, Frank (2010) A General Theory of Dominance and Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
McSherry, Bernadette (2012) ‘Legal Capacity Under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’, Journal of Law and Medicine 20: 2227.
Minkowitz, Tina (2006–2007) ‘The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Right to Be Free from Nonconsensual Psychiatric Interventions’, Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce 34: 405428.
Nicholson, Timothy R.J., Cutter, William and Hotopf, Matthew (2008) ‘Assessing Mental Capacity: The Mental Capacity Act’, BMJ: British Medical Journal 336(7639): 322325.
Nussbaum, Martha (2006) Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
O'Shea, Tom (2015) ‘Disability and Domination: Lessons from Republican Political Philosophy’, Journal of Applied Philosophy 33(2), online.
Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights (2005) Background Conference Document on Legal Capacity (Prepared as Part of the Ad Hoc Committee Deliberations Following the Fifth Session). New York: OHCHR. Available at: <http://www2.ohchr.org/SPdocs/CRPD/DGD21102009/OHCHR_BP_Legal_Capacity.doc> (assessed 28 October 2016).
Oliver, Michael (2004) ‘The Social Model in Action: If I Had a Hammer’ in Barnes, Colin and Mercer, Geof (eds) Implementing the Social Model of Disability: Theory and Research. Leeds: The Disability Press.
Owen, Gareth S., Freyenhagen, Fabian, Richardson, Genevra and Hotopf, Matthew (2009) ‘Mental Capacity and Decisional Autonomy: An Interdisciplinary Challenge’, Inquiry 52(1): 79107.
Pettit, Phillip (1997) Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. New York: Oxford University Press.
Quinn, Gerard (2009) ‘A Short Guide to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’ in Quinn, Gerard and Waddington, Lisa (eds) European Yearbook on Disability Law: Volume 1. Cambridge: Intersentia.
Rawls, John (2009) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rehbinder, Manfred (1970–1971) ‘Status, Contract, and the Welfare State’, Stanford Law Review 23: 941–55.
Series, Lucy (2013) ‘The Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the Institutional Domination of People with Learning Disabilities’, doctoral thesis in Law, University of Exeter.
Series, Lucy (2015) ‘Relationships, Autonomy and Legal Capacity: Mental Capacity and Support Paradigms’, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 40: 8091.
Shakespeare, Tom and Watson, Nicholas (1997) ‘Defending the Social Model’, Disability & Society 12(2): 293300.
Shields, Stephanie A. (1982) ‘The Variability Hypothesis: The History of a Biological Model of Sex Differences in Intelligence’, Signs 7(4): 769797.
Tajfel, Henri (2010) Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, James Stacey (ed.) (2005) Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and Its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Teubner, Gunther (2000) ‘Contracting Worlds: The Many Autonomies of Private Law’, Social and Legal Studies 9(3): 399418.
Topor, Alain, Andersson, Gunnel, Bülow, Per, Stefansson, Claes-Göran and Denhov, Anne (2016) ‘After the Asylum? The New Institutional Landscape’, Community Mental Health Journal 52(6): 731737.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Law in Context
  • ISSN: 1744-5523
  • EISSN: 1744-5531
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-law-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed