Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T11:01:22.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A low insertion loss low-pass filter based on single comb-shaped spoof surface plasmon polaritons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2019

Luping Li
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, P. R. China Aircraft swarm intelligent sensing and cooperative control Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, P. R. China
Lijuan Dong
Affiliation:
School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, P. R. China
Peng Chen*
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, P. R. China Aircraft swarm intelligent sensing and cooperative control Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, P. R. China
Kai Yang
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, P. R. China Aircraft swarm intelligent sensing and cooperative control Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, P. R. China
*
Author for correspondence: Peng Chen, E-mail: chenp@uestc.edu.cn

Abstract

This paper presents a low insertion loss low-pass filter based on the spoof surface plasmon polariton (SSPP) with single comb-shape. Compared with traditional ones, the proposed filter provides lower insertion loss and return loss by optimizing the structural parameters of the mode conversion and SSPP parts. According to the measurement results, the average insertion loss of the fabricated filter is 0.41 dB and the return loss of which at the near-zero-hertz band is <−25.9 dB. The S parameter comparison result between the unoptimized and optimized filters demonstrates that the optimized filter provides lower insertion loss and return loss, smaller size, and better out-of-band rejection. The dispersion comparison result reveals the reasons behind the improved performances. The better performances of the optimized filter proves that breaking the regularity of traditional SSPP filters is beneficial to the filter's performances.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Maier, SA (2007) Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications. Berlin: Springer, 52, 4974.Google Scholar
2.Ozbay, E (2006) Plasmonics: merging photonics and electronics at nanoscale dimensions. Science 311, 189193.Google Scholar
3.Barnes, WL, Dereux, A and Ebbesen, TW (2003) Surface plasmon subwavelength optics. Nature 44, 824830.Google Scholar
4.Chen, P, Li, L, Yang, K and Chen, Q (2018) Hybrid spoof surface plasmon polariton and substrate integrated waveguide broadband bandpass filter with wide out-of-band rejection. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters 28, 984986.Google Scholar
5.Shen, X, Cui, TJ, Martin-Cano, D and Garcia-Vidal, FJ (2013) Conformal surface plasmons propagating on ultrathin and flexible films. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, 4045.Google Scholar
6.Zhao, J, Feng, Y, Zhu, B, Chen, K, Liu, X and Jiang, T (2014) Planar surface plasmonic waveguide devices based on symmetric corrugated thin film structures. Optics Express 22, 20107.Google Scholar
7.Gao, X, Hui Shi, J, Shen, X, Feng Ma, H, Xi'Ang Jiang, W, Li, L and Cui, TJ (2013) Ultrathin dual-band surface plasmonic polariton waveguide and frequency splitter in microwave frequencies. Applied Physics Letters 102, 151912.Google Scholar
8.Liu, L, Li, Z, Ning, P and Xu, B (2015) A band-pass plasmonic filter based on spoof surface plasmon polaritons. International Congress on Advanced Electromagnetic Materials in Microwaves and Optics, pp. 442444.Google Scholar
9.Liu, X, Zhu, L and Feng, Y (2016) Spoof surface plasmon-based bandpass filter with extremely wide upper stopband. Chinese Physics B 25, 034101.Google Scholar
10.Zhao, L, Zhang, X, Wang, J, Yu, W, Li, J, Su, H and Shen, X (2016) A novel broadband band-pass filter based on spoof surface plasmon polaritons. Scientific Reports 6, 36069.Google Scholar
11.Xu, J, Li, Z, Liu, L, Chen, C, Xu, B, Ning, P and Gu, C (2016) Low-pass plasmonic filter and its miniaturization based on spoof surface plasmon polaritons. Optics Communications 372, 155159.Google Scholar
12.Liu, L, Li, Z, Xu, B, Ning, P, Chen, C and Gu, C (2015) An ultra-wideband low-pass plasmonic filter based on spoof surface plasmon polaritons. Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference Proceedings, APMC, pp. 13.Google Scholar
13.Zhang, D, Wu, Q, Zhang, K, Ding, X and Sha, X (2016) High performance plasmonic waveguide with compact transition structure. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Electronic Information and Communication Technology (ICEICT), no. Iceict, pp. 559–562, IEEE, August.Google Scholar
14.Zhao, S, Zhang, HC, Zhao, J and Tang, WX (2017) An ultra-compact rejection filter based on spoof surface plasmon polaritons. Scientific Reports 7, 10576.Google Scholar
15.Zhou, YJ and Yang, BJ (2015) Planar spoof plasmonic ultra-wideband filter based on low-loss and compact terahertz waveguide corrugated with dumbbell grooves. Applied Optics 54, 4529.Google Scholar
16.Hu, MZ, Zhang, HC, Yin, JY, Ding, Z, Liu, JF, Tang, WX and Cui, TJ (2016) Ultra-wideband filtering of spoof surface plasmon polaritons using deep subwavelength planar structures. Scientific Reports 6, 37605.Google Scholar
17.Li, Z, Sun, Y, Sun, H, Wang, K, Song, J, Liu, L, Chen, X and Gu, C (2017) Spoof surface plasmons tunneling through an epsilon-near-zero material channel. Journal of Physics D Applied Physics 50, 375105.Google Scholar
18.Xiao, B, Chen, J and Kong, S (2016) Filters based on spoof surface plasmon polaritons composed of planar Mach-Zehnder interferometer. Journal of Modern Optics 63, 15291532.Google Scholar
19.Zhang, Q, Zhang, HC, Wu, H and Cui, TJ (2015) A hybrid circuit for spoof surface plasmons and spatial waveguide modes to reach controllable band-pass filters. Scientific Reports 5, 16531.Google Scholar
20.Zhang, Q, Zhang, HC, Yin, JY, Pan, BC and Cui, TJ (2016) A series of compact rejection filters based on the interaction between spoof SPPs and CSRRs. Scientific Reports 6, 28256.Google Scholar