Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-n9lxd Total loading time: 0.325 Render date: 2022-09-28T22:14:15.873Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Economics of preventing premature mortality and impaired cognitive development in children through home-fortification: A health policy perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2008

Waseem Sharieff
Affiliation:
University of Toronto and McMaster University
Stanley H. Zlotkin
Affiliation:
The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto
Wendy J. Ungar
Affiliation:
The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto
Brian Feldman
Affiliation:
The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto
Murray D. Krahn
Affiliation:
Toronto General Hospital and University of Toronto
George Tomlinson
Affiliation:
Toronto General Hospital and University of Toronto

Abstract

Background: Home-fortification is a new strategy of adding micronutrients including zinc and iron to home-made foods. Zinc supplementation may prevent morbidity and mortality related to diarrheal illnesses, and iron supplementation may improve cognitive development, in children.

Objectives: To project clinical and economic effects of home-fortification in children in an urban slum of Karachi, Pakistan.

Methods: This is a cost benefit analysis of 5,000 simulated male and female infants (6–12 months) assigned to micronutrients or placebo for 4 months and followed for 55 years. We linked the effect of zinc on longitudinal prevalence of diarrhea to mortality, and the effect of iron on hemoglobin to IQ scores and lifetime earnings. Cost estimates were based on volumes of resource utilization from the Pakistan Sprinkles Diarrhea study. Main outcome was incremental benefit defined as the gain in lifetime earnings after accounting for the incremental costs of micronutrients over placebo (societal perspective).

Results: Our model projected that the reduction in diarrhea and improvement in hemoglobin concentrations through home-fortification was associated with reduced child mortality, higher IQ scores, and higher earnings. The present value of incremental benefit was $106 (95 percent probability interval = $17 to $193) U.S. dollars, which corresponds to $464.79 ($74.54 to $846.27) international dollars using a purchasing power parity exchange rate.

Conclusions: Home-fortification appears to improve clinical outcomes at a reasonable cost, and may actually be cost beneficial when lifetime earnings are considered.

Type
GENERAL ESSAYS
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Alderman, H, Behrman, J, Ross, D, et al. The returns to endogenous human capital in Pakistan's rural wage labour market. Oxford Bull Econ Stat. 1996;58:2955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bairagi, R, Koenig, MA, Mazumder, KA. Mortality-discriminating power of some nutritional, sociodemographic, and diarrheal disease indices. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;138:310317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Baltussen, R, Knai, C, Sharan, M. Iron fortification and iron supplementation are cost-effective interventions to reduce iron deficiency in four subregions of the world. J Nutr. 2004;134:26782684.Google Scholar
4. Bern, C, Martines, J, de Zoysa, I, et al. The magnitude of the global problem of diarrhoeal disease: A ten-year update. Bull World Health Organ. 1992;70:705714.Google Scholar
5. Bhutta, ZA, Bird, SM, Black, RE, et al. Therapeutic effects of oral zinc in acute and persistent diarrhea in children in developing countries: Pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;72:15161522.Google ScholarPubMed
6. Bhutta, ZA, Jiwani, A, Feroze, A, et al. Assessment of human zinc deficiency and determinants in Pakistan: Implications for interventions. www.fertilizer.org/ifa/publicat/PDF/2007_zinccrops2007_bhutta.pdf. Accessed 5 October 2007.Google Scholar
7. Briggs, A. Handling uncertainty in economic evaluation. BMJ. 1999;319:120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Campbell, F, Pungello, E, Miller-Johnson, S, et al. The development of cognitive and academic abilities: Growth curves from an early childhood educational experiment. Dev Psychol. 2001;37:231242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Economic Indicators—Pakistan, 2004. http://earthtrends.wri.org/pdf_library/country_profiles/Eco_cou_586.pdf. Accessed 15 December 2004.Google Scholar
10. Grosse, S, Matte, T, Schwartz, J, et al. Economic gains resulting from the reduction in children's exposure to lead in the United States. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110:563569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Henry, F. The epidemiologic importance of dysentery in communities. Rev Infect Dis. 1991;13:S238-S244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Hodgson, TA. The state of the art of cost-of-illness estimates. Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 1983;4:129164.Google ScholarPubMed
13. Horton, S, Ross, J. The economics of iron deficiency. Food Policy. 2003;28:5175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Krivel, P. A spoonful of ‘Sprinkles’ helps the medicine go down. The Toronto Star. 3 June 2004. http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&call_pageid=971358637177&c=Article&cid=1086086012442. Accessed 16 June 2004.Google Scholar
15. Layard, R, Glaister, S. Cost benefit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Loevinsohn, BP, Sutter, RW, Costales, MO. Using cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate targeting strategies: The case of vitamin A supplementation. Health Policy Plan. 1997;12:2937.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Lopez, AD, Mathers, CD, Ezzati, M, et al. Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: Systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet. 2006;367:17471757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Lozoff, B, Beard, J, Connor, J, et al. Long-lasting neural and behavioral effects of iron deficiency in infancy. Nutr Rev. 2006;64 (pt 2):S34-S43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Lozoff, B, Jimenez, E, Hagen, J, et al. Poorer behavioral and developmental outcome more than 10 years after treatment for iron deficiency in infancy. Pediatrics. 2000;105:E51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Lozoff, B. Behavioral alterations in iron deficiency. Adv Pediatr. 1988;35:331359.Google Scholar
21. Molla, A, Khaurshed, M, Molla, AM. Prevalence of iron deficiency anaemia in children of the urban slums of Karachi. J Pak Med Assoc. 1992;42:118121.Google ScholarPubMed
22. Morris, S, Cousens, S, Kirkwood, B, et al. Is prevalence of diarrhea a better predictor of subsequent mortality and weight gain than diarrhea incidence? Am J Epidemiol. 1996;144:582588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Palti, H, Pevsner, B, Adler, B. Does anemia in infancy effect achievement on development and intelligence tests? Human Biol. 1983;55:194198.Google Scholar
24. Rahman, A, Maqbool, E, Zuberi, HS. Lead-associated deficits in stature, mental ability and behaviour in children in Karachi. Ann Trop Paediatr. 2002;22:301311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Rivera, F, Walter, T. Effects on school performance at age ten years of former iron deficiency anemia in infancy. Rev Child Pediatr. 1996;67:141147.Google Scholar
26. Salkever, D. Updated estimates of earnings benefits from reduced exposure of children to environmental lead. Environ Res. 1995;70:16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Schauer, C, Zlotkin, S. Home fortification with micronutrient sprinkles—A new approach for the prevention and treatment of nutritional anemias. Paediatr Child Health. 2003;8:8790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Schwartz, J. Societal benefits of reducing lead exposure. Envrion Res. 1994;66:105–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Shankar, A, Prasad, A. Zinc and immune function: The biologic basis of altered resistance to infection. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;68:447S-463S.Google Scholar
30. Sharieff, W, Bhutta, ZA, Schauer, C, et al. Micronutrients (including zinc) reduce diarrhoea in children: The Pakistan sprinkles diarrhoea study. Arch Dis Child. 2006;91:573579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Sharieff, W, Horton, SE, Zlotkin, S. Economic gains of a home fortification program: Evaluation of “Sprinkles” from the provider's perspective. Can J Public Health. 2006;97:2023.Google Scholar
32. Sharieff, W, Zlotkin, S, Tondeur, M, et al. Physiologic mechanisms can predict hematologic responses to iron supplements in growing children: A computer simulation model. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83:681687.Google ScholarPubMed
33. Sweat, M, Gregorich, S, Sangiwa, G, et al. Cost effectiveness of voluntary HIV-1 counselling and testing in reducing sexual transmission of HIV-1 in Kenya and Tanzania. Lancet. 2000;356:113121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34. Tondeur, MC, Schauer, CS, Christofides, AL, et al. Determination of iron absorption from intrinsically labeled microencapsulated ferrous fumarate (sprinkles) in infants with different iron and hematologic status by using a dual-stable-isotope method. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80:14361444.Google ScholarPubMed
35. Trasande, L, Landrigan, PJ, Schechter, C. Public health and economic consequences of methyl mercury toxicity to the developing brain. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:590596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36. United Nations Children's Education Fund. The state of the world's children 2005:“Childhood under threat.” http://www.unicef.org/sowc05/english/fullreport.html. Accessed 12 July 2005.Google Scholar
37. Walter, T. Effect of iron-deficiency anemia on cognitive skills and neuromaturation in infancy and childhood. Food Nutr Bull. 2003;24 (Suppl):S104-S110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38. Yoon, P, Black, R, Moulton, L, et al. The effect of malnutrition on the risk of diarrheal and respiratory mortality in children <2 y of age in Cebu, Philippines. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65:10701077.Google Scholar
39. Zlotkin, SH, Schauer, C, Agyei, SO, et al. Demonstrating zinc and iron bioavailability from intrinsically labeled microencapsulated ferrous fumarate and zinc gluconate sprinkles in young children. J Nutr. 2006;136:9209292095.Google ScholarPubMed
40. Zlotkin, SH, Schauer, C, Christofides, A, et al. Micronutrient sprinkles to control childhood anaemia. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Sharieff supplementary material

Sharieff supplementary material

Download Sharieff supplementary material(File)
File 54 KB
7
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Economics of preventing premature mortality and impaired cognitive development in children through home-fortification: A health policy perspective
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Economics of preventing premature mortality and impaired cognitive development in children through home-fortification: A health policy perspective
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Economics of preventing premature mortality and impaired cognitive development in children through home-fortification: A health policy perspective
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *