Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-ffbbcc459-slw7l Total loading time: 0.26 Render date: 2022-03-08T06:40:00.196Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Selecting digital health technologies for validation and piloting by healthcare providers: a decision-making perspective from ontario

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2019

Amarjit Chahal*
Affiliation:
Thunder Bay Regional Health Research Institute
Abraham Rudnick
Affiliation:
Thunder Bay Regional Health Research Institute
*
Author for correspondence: Amarjit Chahal, E-mail: chahala@tbh.net

Abstract

Digital health technologies (DHTs) such as health apps are rapidly emerging as a major disruptor of health care. Yet there is no well-established process of decision making for selecting DHTs that are worthy of investing resources in their validation to determine whether they are ready (safe, effective, and not too costly) for health related use. We report here on an Ontario-based initiative to support such decision making. Specifically, we developed a decision-making algorithm that uses approved criteria including the strategic direction of the health research institute and the hospital, and availability of resources. The Council of Academic Hospitals of Ontario has adapted our approach for other hospitals. We hope that other healthcare organizations, in and beyond Ontario, will consider this and alternative approaches, and that research will be conducted to evaluate such approaches.

Type
Perspective
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Acumen. Radiology QA. http://acumyn.com/aqua-radiology (accessed July 24, 2018).Google Scholar
2.MEDITECH. https://ehr.meditech.com (accessed July 24, 2018).Google Scholar
3.VitalConnect. https://vitalconnect.com (accessed July 24, 2018).Google Scholar
4.AdEchoTech. http://www.adechotech.com (accessed July 24, 2018).Google Scholar
5.BioSymetrics. https://www.biosymetrics.com (accessed July 24, 2018).Google Scholar
6.Portable Medical Diagnostics. https://www.pmdxu.com (accessed July 24, 2018).Google Scholar
7.DashMD. http://www.dashmd.co (accessed July 24, 2018).Google Scholar
8.The Council of Academic Hospitals of Ontario. Innovation Broker. http://caho-hospitals.com/partnerships/innovation-broker (accessed July 24, 2018).Google Scholar
9.Canadian Institute for Health Information. Health Spending. https://www.cihi.ca/en/health-spending (accessed July 24, 2018).Google Scholar
10.Health Quality Ontario. A report on Health in the North: A report on geography and the health of people in Ontario's two northern regions by Health Quality Ontario. 2017. http://healthinthenorth.hqontario.ca (accessed July 24, 2018).Google Scholar
11.Majumder, S, Aghayi, E, Noferesti, M, et al. (2017) Smart Homes for Elderly Healthcare—Recent Advances and Research Challenges. Sensors 17, 2496. doi:10.3390/s17112496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.World Health Organization. Aging and health. http://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health (accessed July 24, 2018).Google Scholar
13.Statista. Mobile usage in Canada-Statistics and Facts. https://www.statista.com/topics/3529/mobile-usage-in-canada (accessed July 24, 2018).Google Scholar
14.TrinetX. https://www.trinetx.com (accessed July 24, 2018).Google Scholar
15.Lee, JA, Choi, M, Lee, SA, et al. (2018) Effective behavioral intervention strategies using mobile health applications for chronic disease management: A systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 18, 12. doi:10.1186/s12911-018-0591-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Ngwatu, BK, Nsengiyumva, NP, Oxlade, O, et al. (2018) The impact of digital health technologies on tuberculosis treatment: A systematic review. Eur Respir J 51, pii: 1701596. doi:10.1183/13993003.01596-2017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Gambhir, SS, Ge, TJ, Vermesh, O, et al. (2018) Toward achieving precision health. Sci Transl Med 10, pii: eaao3612. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aao3612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Deloitte. 2018 Global life sciences outlook. Innovating life sciences in the fourth industrial revolution: Embrace, build, grow. https://www2.deloitte.com/global/en/pages/life-sciences-and-healthcare/articles/global-life-sciences-sector-outlook.html (accessed July 24, 2018).Google Scholar
19.The Council of Academic Hospitals of Ontario. Critical Problems Requiring Innovative Solutions. http://caho-hospitals.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/CAHO-Innovation-Broker-Critical-Problems-Requiring-Solutions.pdf (accessed July 24, 2018).Google Scholar
20.FORTUNE. Why startups fail, according to their founders. http://fortune.com/2014/09/25/why-startups-fail-according-to-their-founders (accessed July 24, 2018).Google Scholar
21.Rudnick, A (2014) Principled physician (and other health care) leadership: Introducing a value-based approach. Can J Physician Leadership 1, 710.Google Scholar
1
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Selecting digital health technologies for validation and piloting by healthcare providers: a decision-making perspective from ontario
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Selecting digital health technologies for validation and piloting by healthcare providers: a decision-making perspective from ontario
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Selecting digital health technologies for validation and piloting by healthcare providers: a decision-making perspective from ontario
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *