Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 29
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Andersson, Stefan Magnusson, Lennart and Hanson, Elizabeth 2016. The use of information and communication technologies to support working carers of older people - a qualitative secondary analysis. International Journal of Older People Nursing, Vol. 11, Issue. 1, p. 32.


    Bose, Eliezer Hoffman, Leslie and Hravnak, Marilyn 2016. Monitoring cardiorespiratory instability: Current approaches and implications for nursing practice. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, Vol. 34, p. 12.


    O'Day, Roderick Smith, Constance Muir, Josephine and Turner, Angus 2016. Optometric use of a teleophthalmology service in rural Western Australia: comparison of two prospective audits. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, Vol. 99, Issue. 2, p. 163.


    Kierkegaard, Patrick 2015. Mapping Telemedicine Efforts: Surveying Regional Initiatives in Denmark. Telemedicine and e-Health, Vol. 21, Issue. 5, p. 427.


    Kim, Eunhae Gellis, Zvi D. and Hoak, Vicki 2015. Telehealth Utilization for Chronic Illness and Depression Among Home Health Agencies: A Pilot Survey. Home Health Care Services Quarterly, Vol. 34, Issue. 3-4, p. 220.


    McCarty, Carolyn A. Vander Stoep, Ann Violette, Heather and Myers, Kathleen 2015. Interventions Developed for Psychiatric and Behavioral Treatment in the Children’s ADHD Telemental Health Treatment Study. Journal of Child and Family Studies, Vol. 24, Issue. 6, p. 1735.


    Russell, Katie W. Saffle, Jeffrey R. Theurer, Louanna and Cochran, Amalia L. 2015. Transition from grant funding to a self-supporting burn telemedicine program in the western United States. The American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 210, Issue. 6, p. 1037.


    McCrossan, Brian A Doherty, Nicola N Sands, Andrew J Grant, Brian Craig, Brian G McCusker, Chris G and Casey, Frank A 2014. Survey of paediatricians’ opinions on a regional paediatric telecardiology service. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, Vol. 50, Issue. 6, p. 482.


    Singh, Gurjit Pichora-Fuller, M. Kathleen Malkowski, Marissa Boretzki, Michael and Launer, Stefan 2014. A survey of the attitudes of practitioners toward teleaudiology. International Journal of Audiology, Vol. 53, Issue. 12, p. 850.


    Bradford, Natalie Armfield, Nigel R Young, Jeanine and Smith, Anthony C 2013. The case for home based telehealth in pediatric palliative care: a systematic review. BMC Palliative Care, Vol. 12, Issue. 1,


    Brooks, Elizabeth Turvey, Carolyn and Augusterfer, Eugene F. 2013. Provider Barriers to Telemental Health: Obstacles Overcome, Obstacles Remaining. Telemedicine and e-Health, Vol. 19, Issue. 6, p. 433.


    LeRouge, Cynthia and Garfield, Monica 2013. Crossing the Telemedicine Chasm: Have the U.S. Barriers to Widespread Adoption of Telemedicine Been Significantly Reduced?. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 10, Issue. 12, p. 6472.


    Asua, José Orruño, Estibalitz Reviriego, Eva and Gagnon, Marie Pierre 2012. Healthcare professional acceptance of telemonitoring for chronic care patients in primary care. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Vol. 12, Issue. 1,


    Gagnon, Marie Pierre Orruño, Estibalitz Asua, José Abdeljelil, Anis Ben and Emparanza, José 2012. Using a Modified Technology Acceptance Model to Evaluate Healthcare Professionals' Adoption of a New Telemonitoring System. Telemedicine and e-Health, Vol. 18, Issue. 1, p. 54.


    Oliver, Debra Parker Demiris, George Wittenberg-Lyles, Elaine Washington, Karla Day, Tami and Novak, Hannah 2012. A Systematic Review of the Evidence Base for Telehospice. Telemedicine and e-Health, Vol. 18, Issue. 1, p. 38.


    Zanaboni, Paolo and Wootton, Richard 2012. Adoption of telemedicine: from pilot stage to routine delivery. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Vol. 12, Issue. 1,


    Demiris, George Parker Oliver, Debra and Wittenberg-Lyles, Elaine 2011. Technologies to Support End-of-Life Care. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, Vol. 27, Issue. 3, p. 211.


    Wälivaara, Britt-Marie Andersson, Staffan and Axelsson, Karin 2011. General practitioners’ reasoning about using mobile distance-spanning technology in home care and in nursing home care. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, Vol. 25, Issue. 1, p. 117.


    Jordanova, Malina 2010. Healthcare and the Effect of Technology.


    Richardson, Lisa K. Christopher Frueh, B. Grubaugh, Anouk L. Egede, Leonard and Elhai, Jon D. 2009. Current Directions in Videoconferencing Tele-Mental Health Research. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, Vol. 16, Issue. 3, p. 323.


    ×
  • International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Volume 21, Issue 4
  • October 2005, pp. 517-521

Addressing telehealth's foremost barrier: Provider as initial gatekeeper

  • Pamela S. Whitten (a1) and Michael S. Mackert (a2)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266462305050725
  • Published online: 01 October 2005
Abstract

Objectives: During the past decade, telehealth has enjoyed a plethora of public funding and publication outlets around the world. Yet, rhetoric appears to be outpacing the actual diffusion and utilization of telehealth technologies for patient care. Several barriers, such as reimbursement and legal/regulatory issues, are commonly cited as impeding the successful deployment of this innovation. However, two separate studies carried out in Michigan that controlled for these barriers point out a more significant initial gatekeeper to the deployment of telehealth, namely providers.

Methods: Multiple data collection strategies were used in both the telehospice and telepsychiatry projects, including utilization logs, surveys, telehospice nursing notes, cost frame data collection, patient interviews, caregiver interviews and focus groups, and videotaped visits.

Results: This study summarizes data from the two studies to support the hypothesis that the provider is the most important initial gatekeeper for telemedicine.

Conclusions: The implications from this conclusion have important consequences for health system deployment strategies. Specifically, telemedicine project managers must keep providers' needs (ease of use and incentives) in mind when designing a telemedicine system.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: