1.ANAND, P.QALYS and the integration of claims in health-care rationing. Health Care Anal. 1999;7:239–253.
2.Anand, P.The integration of claims to health-care: A programming approach. J Health Econ. 2003;22:731–745.
3.Baltussen, R, Niessen, L. Priority setting of health interventions: The need for multi-criteria decision analysis. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2006;4:14.
4.Baltussen, R, Stolk, E, Chisholm, D, Aikins, M. Towards a multi-criteria approach for priority setting: An application to Ghana. Health Econ. 2006;15:689–696.
5.Baltussen, R, ten Asbroek, AH, Koolman, X, et al. Priority setting using multiple criteria: Should a lung health programme be implemented in Nepal? Health Policy Plan. 2007;22:178–185.
6.Birch, S, Gafni, A. Cost effectiveness/utility analyses. Do current decision rules lead us to where we want to be? J Health Econ. 1992;11:279–296.
7.Bleichrodt, H. Health utility indices and equity considerations. J Health Econ. 1997;16:65–91.
8.Bleichrodt, H, Diecidue, E, Quiggin, J. Equity weights in the allocation of health care: The rank-dependent QALY model. J Health Econ. 2004;23:157–171.
9.Brock, D. Empirical ethics, moral philosophy, and the democracy problem. In: Murray, CJ, Salomon, JA, Mathers, C, Lopez, AD, eds. Summary measures of population health. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2003.
10.Cantor, SB. Cost-effectiveness analysis, extended dominance, and ethics: A quantitative assessment. Med Decis Making. 1994;14:259–265.
11.Cleary, S, Mooney, G, McIntyre, D. Equity and efficiency in HIV-treatment in South Africa: The contribution of mathematical programming to priority setting. Health Econ. 2010;19:1166–1180.
12.Cookson, R, Drummond, M, Weatherly, H. Explicit incorporation of equity considerations into economic evaluation of public health interventions. Health Econ Policy Law. 2009;4 (Pt 2):231–245.
13.Daniels, N.Just health: Meeting health needs fairly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
14.Dolan, P. The measurement of individual utility and social welfare. J Health Econ. 1998;17:39–52.
15.Drummond, MF, Sculpher, MJ, Torrance, GW, O'Brien, BJ, Stoddart, GL. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
16.Earnshaw, SR, Richter, A, Sorensen, SW, et al. Optimal allocation of resources across four interventions for type 2 diabetes. Med Decis Making. 2002; 22 (Suppl):S80–S91.
17.Epstein, DM, Chalabi, Z, Claxton, K, Sculpher, M. Efficiency, equity, and budgetary policies: Informing decisions using mathematical programming. Med Decis Making. 2007;27:128–137.
18.Fishkin, JS.Democracy and deliberation: New directions for democratic reform. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1991.
19.Goetghebeur, MM, Wagner, M, Khoury, H, et al. Combining multicriteria decision analysis, ethics and health technology assessment: Applying the EVIDEM decision-making framework to growth hormone for Turner syndrome patients. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2010;8:4.
20.Jehu-Appiah, C, Baltussen, R, Acquah, C, et al. Balancing equity and efficiency in health priorities in Ghana: The use of multicriteria decision analysis. Value Health. 2008;11:1081–1087.
21.Johannesson, M. Should we aggregate relative or absolute changes in QALYs? Health Econ. 2001;10:573–577.
22.Johri, M, Damschroder, LJ, Zikmund-Fisher, BJ, Ubel, PA. The importance of age in allocating health care resources: Does intervention-type matter? Health Econ. 2005;14:669–678.
23.Kaplan, EH, Merson, MH. Allocating HIV-prevention resources: Balancing efficiency and equity. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:1905–1907.
24.Lindholm, L, Rosen, M. On the measurement of the nation's equity adjusted health. Health Econ. 1998;7:621–628.
25.Lindholm, L, Rosen, M, Emmelin, M. How many lives is equity worth? A proposal for equity adjusted years of life saved. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52:808–811.
26.Lloyd, AJ. Threats to the estimation of benefit: Are preference elicitation methods accurate? Health Econ. 2003;12:393–402.
27.Makundi, E, Kapiriri, L, Norheim, OF. Combining evidence and values in priority setting: Testing the balance sheet method in a low-income country. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:152.
28.Mortimer, D. The value of thinly spread QALYs. Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24:845–853.
29.Nord, E.Cost-value analysis in health care: Making sense out of QALYs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
30.Nord, E, Pinto, JL, Richardson, J, Menzel, P, Ubel, P. Incorporating societal concerns for fairness in numerical valuations of health programmes. Health Econ. 1999;8:25–39.
31.Norheim, OF, Asada, Y. The ideal of equal health revisited: Definitions and measures of inequity in health should be better integrated with theories of distributive justice. Int J Equity Health. 2009;8:40.
32.Rodriguez, E, Pinto, JL. The social value of health programmes: Is age a relevant factor? Health Econ. 2000;9:611–621.
33.Rodriguez-Miguez, E, Pinto-Prades, JL. Measuring the social importance of concentration or dispersion of individual health benefits. Health Econ. 2002;11:43–53.
34.Sassi, F, Archard, L, Le Grand, J. Equity and the economic evaluation of healthcare. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5:i+iii–130.
35.Schwappach, DL. Resource allocation, social values and the QALY: A review of the debate and empirical evidence. Health Expect. 2002;5:210–222.
36.Sen, A.On economic inequality. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 1997.
37.Shah, KK. Severity of illness and priority setting in healthcare: A review of the literature. Health Policy. 2009;93:77–84.
38.Stinnett, AA, Paltiel, AD. Mathematical programming for the efficient allocation of health care resources. J Health Econ. 1996;15:641–653.
39.Stolk, EA, van Donselaar, G, Brouwer, WB, Busschbach, JJ. Reconciliation of economic concerns and health policy: Illustration of an equity adjustment procedure using proportional shortfall. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22:1097–1107.
40.The Global Equity Gauge Alliance. The equity gauge: Concepts, principles, and guidelines. Durban: Global Equity Gauge Alliance and Health Systems Trust; 2003.
41.Tsuchiya, A. Age-related preferences and age weighting health benefits. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:267–276.
42.Tsuchiya, A, Dolan, P, Shaw, R. Measuring people's preferences regarding ageism in health: Some methodological issues and some fresh evidence. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:687–696.
43.Tsuchiya, A, Williams, A. A “fair innings” between the sexes: Are men being treated inequitably? Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:277–286.
44.Ubel, PA. How stable are people's preferences for giving priority to severely ill patients? Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:895–903.
45.Ubel, PA, DeKay, ML, Baron, J, Asch, DA. Cost-effectiveness analysis in a setting of budget constraints–is it equitable? N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1174–1177.
46.Wagstaff, A. QALYs and the equity-efficiency trade-off. J Health Econ. 1991;10:21–41.
47.Weatherly, H, Drummond, M, Claxton, K, et al. Methods for assessing the cost-effectiveness of public health interventions: Key challenges and recommendations. Health Policy. 2009;93:85–92.
48.Williams, A. Intergenerational equity: An exploration of the ‘fair innings’ argument. Health Econ. 1997;6:117–132.
49.Wolfson, M, Rowe, G. On measuring inequalities in health. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79:553–560.
50.World Health Organization. Health systems: Improving performance. World Health Report Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2000:i–141.
51.Zaric, GS, Brandeau, ML. Optimal investment in a portfolio of HIV prevention programs. Med Decis Making. 2001;21:391–408.
52.Zenios, SA, Wein, LM, Chertow, GM. Evidence-based organ allocation. Am J Med. 1999;107:52–61.