Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 31
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Verde, Pablo E. Ohmann, Christian Morbach, Stephan and Icks, Andrea 2016. Bayesian evidence synthesis for exploring generalizability of treatment effects: a case study of combining randomized and non-randomized results in diabetes. Statistics in Medicine, Vol. 35, Issue. 10, p. 1654.

    Debray, Thomas P. A. Moons, Karel G. M. van Valkenhoef, Gert Efthimiou, Orestis Hummel, Noemi Groenwold, Rolf H. H. and Reitsma, Johannes B. 2015. Get real in individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis: a review of the methodology. Research Synthesis Methods, Vol. 6, Issue. 4, p. 293.

    Kunz, Lauren M. Normand, Sharon-Lise T. and Sedrakyan, Art 2015. Meta-analysis of rate ratios with differential follow-up by treatment arm: inferring comparative effectiveness of medical devices. Statistics in Medicine, Vol. 34, Issue. 21, p. 2913.

    Verde, Pablo E. and Ohmann, Christian 2015. Combining randomized and non-randomized evidence in clinical research: a review of methods and applications. Research Synthesis Methods, Vol. 6, Issue. 1, p. 45.

    Mt-Isa, Shahrul Hallgreen, Christine E. Wang, Nan Callréus, Torbjörn Genov, Georgy Hirsch, Ian Hobbiger, Stephen F. Hockley, Kimberley S. Luciani, Davide Phillips, Lawrence D. Quartey, George Sarac, Sinan B. Stoeckert, Isabelle Tzoulaki, Ioanna Micaleff, Alain and Ashby, Deborah 2014. Balancing benefit and risk of medicines: a systematic review and classification of available methodologies. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Vol. 23, Issue. 7, p. 667.

    Kastner, Monika Tricco, Andrea C Soobiah, Charlene Lillie, Erin Perrier, Laure Horsley, Tanya Welch, Vivian Cogo, Elise Antony, Jesmin and Straus, Sharon E 2012. What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 12, Issue. 1,

    Scholl, Hans J. and Carlson, Timothy S. 2012. Professional sports teams on the Web: a comparative study employing the information management perspective. European Sport Management Quarterly, Vol. 12, Issue. 2, p. 137.

    Weiss, Carlos O. Segal, Jodi B. and Varadhan, Ravi 2012. Assessing the applicability of trial evidence to a target sample in the presence of heterogeneity of treatment effect. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Vol. 21, p. 121.

    2012. Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making in Healthcare.

    Fu, Rongwei Gartlehner, Gerald Grant, Mark Shamliyan, Tatyana Sedrakyan, Art Wilt, Timothy J. Griffith, Lauren Oremus, Mark Raina, Parminder Ismaila, Afisi Santaguida, Pasqualina Lau, Joseph and Trikalinos, Thomas A. 2011. Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 64, Issue. 11, p. 1187.

    Pirani, M. Marcheselli, R. Marcheselli, L. Bari, A. Federico, M. and Sacchi, S. 2011. Risk for second malignancies in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors: a meta-analysis. Annals of Oncology, Vol. 22, Issue. 8, p. 1845.

    Wilkes, M. M. Navickis, R. J. Chan, W. W. and Lewiecki, E. M. 2010. Bisphosphonates and osteoporotic fractures: a cross-design synthesis of results among compliant/persistent postmenopausal women in clinical practice versus randomized controlled trials. Osteoporosis International, Vol. 21, Issue. 4, p. 679.

    Jones, David R. Peters, Jaime L. Rushton, Lesley Sutton, Alex J. and Abrams, Keith R. 2009. Interspecies extrapolation in environmental exposure standard setting: A Bayesian synthesis approach. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Vol. 53, Issue. 3, p. 217.

    O'Brien, Sarah H. 2009. Secondary data demonstrate safety of splenectomy in spherocytosis. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, Vol. 52, Issue. 7, p. 753.

    Sutton, Alexander J. and Higgins, Julian P. T. 2008. Recent developments in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, Vol. 27, Issue. 5, p. 625.

    Ades, A. E. and Sutton, A. J. 2006. Multiparameter evidence synthesis in epidemiology and medical decision-making: current approaches. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), Vol. 169, Issue. 1, p. 5.

    Ades, A E Sculpher, Mark Sutton, Alex Abrams, Keith Cooper, Nicola Welton, Nicky and Lu, Guobing 2006. Bayesian Methods for Evidence Synthesis in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. PharmacoEconomics, Vol. 24, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Barker, Fred G. and Carter, Bob S. 2005. Synthesizing medical evidence: systematic reviews and metaanalyses. Neurosurgical FOCUS, Vol. 19, Issue. 4, p. 1.

    Briggs, Andrew Sculpher, Mark Dawson, Jill Fitzpatrick, Ray Murray, David and Malchau, Henrik 2004. The Use of Probabilistic Decision Models in Technology Assessment. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Vol. 3, Issue. 2, p. 79.

    Ades, A. E. 2003. A chain of evidence with mixed comparisons: models for multi-parameter synthesis and consistency of evidence. Statistics in Medicine, Vol. 22, Issue. 19, p. 2995.

  • International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Volume 9, Issue 3
  • July 1993, pp. 440-449

Cross-design Synthesis: A New Form of Meta-analysis for Combining Results from Randomized Clinical Trials and Medical-practice Databases

  • Judith Droitcour (a1), George Silberman (a1) and Eleanor Chelimsky (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 March 2009

Cross-design synthesis is a new (and still evolving) strategy for providing quantitative results that capture the strengths and minimize the weaknesses of different kinds of research. The strategy, which is being developed to answer questions about the effects of treatment in medical practice, includes (a) identifying complementary research designs and studies conducted according to those designs; (b) completing an in-depth assessment of each study with respect to the chief potential bias(es) that are associated with its design; (c) making “secondary adjustments” of study results to correct known biases; and (d) developing synthesis frameworks and models that will minimize the impact of hidden biases.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

1.H. J. M. Barnett , D. Sackett , D. W. Taylor , Are the results of the Extracranial Intracranial Bypass Trial generalizable? New England Journal of Medicine, 1987, 316, 820–24.

2.D. P. Byar Why data bases should not replace randomized clinical trials. Biometrics, 1980, 36, 337–42.

3.D. P. Byar , D. A. Schoenfeld , S. B. Green , Design considerations for AIDS trials. New England Journal of Medicine, 1990, 323, 1343–48.

4.R. M. Calif , D. B. Pryor , & J. C. Greenfield Beyond randomized clinical trials: applying clinical experience in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation, 1986, 74, 1191–94.

5.T. C. Chalmers , H. Smith Jr., B. Blackburn , A Method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. Controlled Clinical Trials, 1981, 2, 3149.

14.P. M. Ellwood A technology of patient experience. New England Journal of Medicine, 1988, 318, 1549–56.

15.K. Fischerman , & H. T. Mouridsen Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG): Structure and results of the organization. Acta Oncologica, 1988, 27, 593–96.

21.H. N. Himel , A. Liberati , R. Gelber , & T. C. Chalmers Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: A pooled estimate based on published randomized control trials. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1986, 256, 1148–59.

22.M. A. Hlatky Using databases to evaluate therapy. Statistics in Medicine, 1991, 10, 647–52.

24.G. B. Jackson Methods for integrative reviews. Review of Educational Research, 1980, 50, 438–60. (Reprinted in R. J. Light (ed.), Evaluation studies review annual, vol. 8. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1983.)

26.H. Krakauer , & R. C. Bailey Epidemiological oversight of the medical care provided to Medicare beneficiaries. Statistics in Medicine, 1991, 10, 521–40.

30.T. A. Louis , H. V. Fineberg , & F. Mosteller Findings for public health from metaanalyses. Annual Review of Public Health, 1985, 6, 120.

31.C. McDonald , & H. Siu The analysis of humongous databases: Problems and promises. Statistics in Medicine, 1991, 10, 511–18.

32.R. Moffitt Program evaluation with nonexperimental data. Evaluation Review, 1991, 15(3), 291314.

34.R. Peto Why do we need systematic overviews of randomized trials? Statistics in Medicine, 1987, 6, 233–40.

36.D. B. Pryor , R. M. Califf , F. E. Harrell Jr., Clinical data bases: Accomplishments and unrealized potential. Medical Care, 1985, 23(5), 623–47.

37.N. Roos , J. Wennberg , D. Malenka , Mortality and reoperation after open and transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. New England Journal of Medicine, 1989, 320, 1120–24.

38.W. L. Roper , W. Winkenwerder , G. M. Hackbarth , & H. Krakauer Effectiveness in health care: An initiative to evaluate and improve medical practice. New England Journal of Medicine, 1988, 319, 11971202.

40.D. B. Rubin Practical implications of modes of statistical inference for causal effects and the critical role of the assignment mechanism. Biometrics, 1991, 47(4), 1213–34.

42.D. B. Rubin Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974, 66, 688701.

44.K. M. Taylor , R. G. Margolese , & C. L. Soskoline Physicians reasons for not entering eligible patients in a randomized clinical trial of surgery for breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 1984, 310, 1363–67.

48.J. E. Wennberg , J. L. Freeman , R. M. Shelton , & T. A. Bubolz Hospital use and mortality among medicare beneficiaries in Boston and New Haven. New England Journal of Medicine, 1989, 321, 1168–73.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *