Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 20
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Koerber, Florian and Rittweger, Roman 2016. Business Planning im Gesundheitswesen.

    Sonğur, Cuma and Top, Mehmet 2016. Regional clustering of medical imaging technologies. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 61, p. 333.

    Al-Kwifi, Sam Ahmed, Zafar U. and Yammout, Dina 2014. Brand switching of high-technology capital products: how product features dictate the switching decision. Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 23, Issue. 4/5, p. 322.

    Corallo, Ashley N. Croxford, Ruth Goodman, David C. Bryan, Elisabeth L. Srivastava, Divya and Stukel, Therese A. 2014. A systematic review of medical practice variation in OECD countries. Health Policy, Vol. 114, Issue. 1, p. 5.

    Greenes, Robert A. 2014. Clinical Decision Support.

    Westerling, Ragnar Westin, Marcus McKee, Martin Hoffmann, Rasmus Plug, Iris Rey, Grégoire Jougla, Eric Lang, Katrin Pärna, Kersti Alfonso, José L. and Mackenbach, Johan P. 2014. The timing of introduction of pharmaceutical innovations in seven European countries. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Vol. 20, Issue. 4, p. 301.

    Yip, Winnie and Hsiao, William 2014. Harnessing the privatisation of China's fragmented health-care delivery. The Lancet, Vol. 384, Issue. 9945, p. 805.

    Al‐Kwifi, Sam O. and McNaughton, Rod B. 2013. The influence of product features on brand switching: the case of magnetic resonance imaging equipment. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 28, Issue. 5, p. 421.

    Laut, Kristina Grønborg Gale, Christopher Peter Lash, Timothy L. and Kristensen, Steen Dalby 2013. Determinants and patterns of utilization of primary percutaneous coronary intervention across 12 European countries: 2003–2008. International Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 168, Issue. 3, p. 2745.

    Stein, Joshua D. Hanrahan, Brian W. Comer, Grant M. and Sloan, Frank A. 2013. Diffusion of Technologies for the Care of Older Adults With Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration. American Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 155, Issue. 4, p. 688.

    Keshtkaran, Ali Bagheri, Mohammad Ostovar, Rahim Salari, Hedayat Farrokhi, Majid Reza Esfandiari, Atefeh and Yousefimanesh, Hossein 2012. Developing Criteria for Lumbar Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Using RAND Appropriateness Method (RAM). Iranian Journal of Radiology, Vol. 9, Issue. 3, p. 130.

    Wong, Albert Wouterse, Bram Slobbe, Laurentius C.J. Boshuizen, Hendriek C. and Polder, Johan J. 2012. Medical innovation and age-specific trends in health care utilization: Findings and implications. Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 74, Issue. 2, p. 263.

    Hahm, Myung-Il Park, Eun-Cheol Choi, Kui Son Lee, Hoo-Yeon Park, Jae-Hyun and Park, Sohee 2011. Inequalities in adoption of cancer screening from a diffusion of innovation perspective: Identification of late adopters. Cancer Epidemiology, Vol. 35, Issue. 1, p. 90.

    Otsubo, Tetsuya Imanaka, Yuichi Lee, Jason and Hayashida, Kenshi 2011. Evaluation of resource allocation and supply-demand balance in clinical practice with high-cost technologies. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Vol. 17, Issue. 6, p. 1114.

    Silva, H. P. and Viana, A. L. D. 2011. Health technology diffusion in developing countries: a case study of CT scanners in Brazil. Health Policy and Planning, Vol. 26, Issue. 5, p. 385.

    Bech, Mickael Christiansen, Terkel Dunham, Kelly Lauridsen, Jørgen Lyttkens, Carl Hampus McDonald, Kathryn and McGuire, Alistair 2009. The influence of economic incentives and regulatory factors on the adoption of treatment technologies: a case study of technologies used to treat heart attacks. Health Economics, Vol. 18, Issue. 10, p. 1114.

    Hartz, Susanne and John, Jürgen 2009. Public health policy decisions on medical innovations: What role can early economic evaluation play?. Health Policy, Vol. 89, Issue. 2, p. 184.

    Rogowski, Wolf H Hartz, Susanne C and John, Jürgen H 2008. Clearing up the hazy road from bench to bedside: A framework for integrating the fourth hurdle into translational medicine. BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 8, Issue. 1,

    Greenes, Robert A. 2007. Clinical Decision Support.

    Hahm, Myung-Il Park, Eun-Cheol Lee, Sun-Hee Nam, Chung Mo Kang, Hye-Young Lee, Hoo-Yeon and Cho, Woo-Hyun 2007. Pattern and factors leading to the diffusion of magnetic resonance imaging in Korean hospitals. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Vol. 23, Issue. 02, p. 292.

  • International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Volume 21, Issue 1
  • January 2005, pp. 73-80

Determinants of the diffusion of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

  • Eun-Hwan Oh (a1), Yuichi Imanaka (a1) and Edward Evans (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 January 2005

Objectives: The aim of this study is to explain factors influential to the diffusion of computed tomography (CTs) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs).

Methods: Variables were identified from a review of the literature on the diffusion of health technologies. A formal process was applied to build a conceptual model of the mechanism that drives technology diffusion. Variables for the analysis were classified as predisposing, enabling, or reinforcing factors, in keeping with a model commonly used to explain the diffusion of health behaviors. Multiple regression analysis was conducted using year 2000 OECD data.

Results: The results of this study showed that total health expenditure per capita (p < .01, both CTs and MRIs) and flexible payment methods to hospitals (p < .05, both CTs and MRIs) were significantly associated with the diffusion of CTs and MRIs (adjusted R2 = 0.477, 0.656, respectively).

Conclusions: This study presents a systematically developed model of the mechanism governing technology diffusion. Important findings from the study show that purchasing power, represented by total health expenditure per capita and economic incentives to hospitals in the form of flexible payment methods, were positively correlated with diffusion. Another important achievement of our model is that it accounts for all thirty OECD member countries without excluding any as outliers. This study shows that variation across countries in the diffusion of medical technology can be explained well by a logical model with multiple variables, the results of which hold profound implications for health policy regarding the adoption of innovations.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *