Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 8
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Carroll, Christopher Booth, Andrew and Cooper, Katy 2011. A worked example of "best fit" framework synthesis: A systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents. BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 11, Issue. 1,


    Dijkers, Marcel P. J. M. 2009. The Value of “Traditional” Reviews in the Era of Systematic Reviewing. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Vol. 88, Issue. 5, p. 423.


    Husereau, Don Morrison, Andra Battista, Renaldo and Goeree, Ron 2009. Health Technology Assessment: A Review of International Activity and Examples of Approaches With Computed Tomographic Colonography. Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 6, Issue. 5, p. 343.


    Garattini, Livio and Casadei, Gianluigi 2008. Health technology assessment: for whom the bell tolls?. The European Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 9, Issue. 4, p. 311.


    Lavis, John N Moynihan, Ray Oxman, Andrew D and Paulsen, Elizabeth J 2008. Evidence-informed health policy 4 – Case descriptions of organizations that support the use of research evidence. Implementation Science, Vol. 3, Issue. 1,


    Zygun, D. 2008. Can we demonstrate the efficacy of monitoring?. European Journal of Anaesthesiology, Vol. 25, Issue. Supplement 42, p. 94.


    Hind, Daniel and Booth, Andrew 2007. Do health technology assessments comply with QUOROM diagram guidance? An empirical study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 7, Issue. 1,


    Draborg, Eva and Andersen, Christian Kronborg 2006. Recommendations in health technology assessments worldwide. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Vol. 22, Issue. 02, p. 155.


    ×
  • International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Volume 20, Issue 2
  • April 2004, pp. 177-183

Differences between systematic reviews and health technology assessments: A trade-off between the ideals of scientific rigor and the realities of policy making

  • Dalia Rotstein (a1) and Andreas Laupacis (a2)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266462304000959
  • Published online: 01 April 2004
Abstract

Objectives: To elucidate important differences between a health technology assessment (HTA) and a systematic review, using an HTA of positron emission tomography (PET) as an example.

Methods: Interviews with seventeen individuals who were authors or users of the PET HTA.

Results: Those interviewed identified seven areas in which HTAs often differ from traditional systematic reviews: (i) methodological standards (HTAs may include literature of relatively poor methodological quality if a topic is of importance to decision-makers), (ii) replication of previous studies (relatively common for HTAs but not systematic reviews), (iii) choice of topics (more policy oriented for HTAs, while systematic reviews tend to be driven by researcher interest), (iv) inclusion of content experts and policy-makers as authors (policy-makers more likely to be included in HTAs, although there are potential conflicts of interest), (v) inclusion of economic evaluations (more often with HTAs, although economic evaluations based upon poor clinical data may not be useful), (vi) making policy recommendations (more likely with HTAs, although this must be done with caution), and (vii) dissemination of the report (more often actively done for HTAs).

Conclusions: This case study of an HTA of PET scanning confirms that HTAs are a bridge between science and policy and require a balance between the ideals of scientific rigor and the realities of policy making.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Dr. Andreas Laupacis at alaupacis@ices.on.ca.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: