Skip to main content

Diffusion of diagnostic medical devices and policy implications for India

  • Ajay Mahal (a1), Anil Varshney (a2) and Srinivas Taman (a3)

Objectives: This study describes the diffusion of advanced diagnostic devices in India and assess implications for efficiency in resource use and equity.

Methods: Commodity-level import statistics, household survey data, and interviews with medical device sellers are used to assess the spread of diagnostic devices. Published qualitative evidence, case studies of diagnostic service providers, and cross-country analyses are used to identify the reasons underlying the spread of medical devices in India. Case studies of public and private providers and data from 150 hospitals in one Indian state are used to assess efficiency in resource use and the distributive impacts of diagnostic devices.

Results: High-end medical device inflows rose during the 1990s, with both supply- and demand-side factors influencing this trend. Although our results suggest that the overall quantity of advanced diagnostics in India is not excessive, there is some evidence of inefficiency in public facilities and possibly unethical practices in private diagnostic facilities. The unequal geographical distribution of magnetic resonance imaging facilities, coupled with inefficient use of medical devices in public facilities suggests inequality in access.

Conclusions: The study points to major regulatory gaps and health system inefficiencies and suggests ways in which these gaps can be addressed.

Hide All
Baker L, Wheeler S. 1998 Managed care and technology diffusion: the case of MRI. Health Aff (Millwood). 17: 195207.
Baru R. 1998. Private health care in India: Social characteristics and trends. New Delhi: Sage Publications;
Bryce C, Cline K. 1998 The supply and use of selected medical technologies. Health Aff (Millwood). 17: 213224.
Cutler D, McClellan M. 2001 Is technological change worth it? Health Aff (Millwood). 20: 1129.
Fernandes C. Promoting health and medical tourism in India. Express Travel & Tourism, 2003; September Issue: p. 1.
Fuchs V, Sox H Jr. 2001 Physicians' views of the relative importance of thirty medical innovations. Health Aff (Millwood). 20: 3042.
Government of India. 2004. Economic survey 2004. New Delhi: Ministry of Finance;
Harper S. 2003. Global import regulations for pre-owned (used and re-furbished) medical devices. Washington, DC: United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration;
Indian Radiology and Imaging Association (IRIA). 2005. A brief history of Indian radiology. Available at: Accessed June 30
Johnson T. 2003; Hospitals junk hi-tech equipment. Times of India, Bangalore 3/4. Available at: Accessed December 30, 2004.
Jonsson E, Banta D. 1999 Management of health technologies: An international review. BMJ. 319: 1293.
Lleras-Muney A, Lichtenberg F. 2002; The effect of education on medical technology adoption: Are the more educated more likely to use drugs? NBER working paper # 9185 Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Newhouse J. 1992 Medical care costs: How much welfare loss? J Econ Perspect. 6: 321.
Rublee D. 1994 Medical technology in Canada, Germany and the United States: An update. Health Aff (Millwood). 13: 113117.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 18 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 148 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.