Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

CAN WE RELIABLY BENCHMARK HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT ORGANIZATIONS?

  • Michael Drummond (a1), Peter Neumann (a2), Bengt Jönsson (a3), Bryan Luce (a4), J. Sanford Schwartz (a5), Uwe Siebert (a6) and Sean D. Sullivan (a7)...
Abstract

Objectives: In recent years, there has been growth in the use of health technology assessment (HTA) for making decisions about the reimbursement, coverage, or guidance on the use of health technologies. Given this greater emphasis on the use of HTA, it is important to develop standards of good practice and to benchmark the various HTA organizations against these standards.

Methods: This study discusses the conceptual and methodological challenges associated with benchmarking HTA organizations and proposes a series of audit questions based on a previously published set of principles of good practice.

Results and Conclusions: It is concluded that a benchmarking exercise would be feasible and useful, although the question of who should do the benchmarking requires further discussion. Key issues for further research are the alternative methods for weighting the various principles and for generating an overall score, or summary statement of adherence to the principles. Any weighting system, if developed, would need to be explored in different jurisdictions to assess the extent to which the relative importance of the principles is perceived to vary. Finally, the development and precise wording of the audit questions requires further study, with a view to making the questions as unambiguous as possible, and the reproducibility of the assessments as high as possible.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.


2.JP Bridges , B Hauber , D Marshall , Conjoint analysis applications in health: A checklist. A report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health. 2011;14:403413.


5.C-F Chiou , JW Hay , JF Wallace , Development and validation of a grading system for the quality of cost-effectiveness studies. Med Care. 2003;41:3244.

8.MF Drummond , JS Schwartz , B Jönsson , BR Luce , PJ Neumann . Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008; 24:244258.




17.PJ Neumann , MS Kamae , JA Palmer . Medicare's national coverage decisions for technologies, 1999-2007. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27:16201631.



Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: