Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Impact of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on stimulating National Institutes of Health–funded research, 1998 to 2001

  • Barry Portnoy (a1), Jennifer Miller (a1), Kathryn Brown-Huamani (a2) and Emily DeVoto (a3)
Abstract

Objectives: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Development Conference (CDC) was instituted to provide evidence-based guidance on controversial medical issues to researchers, health practitioners, and the public; however, the degree of impact this activity has on stimulating relevant research is unclear. This study examines the impact of CDC statements on the initiation of related NIH-funded research projects.

Methods: Six CDCs from 1998 to 2001 were examined. Research initiatives related to the Conferences' topics were collected through two discrete methods: (i) the overall number of relevant pre- and postconference research activities was compiled using NIH's Information for Management, Planning, Analysis, and Coordination II (IMPAC II) and the Department of Health and Human Services' (DHHS) Computer Retrieval of Information on Scientific Projects (CRISP) grant application and award databases; (ii) for each CDC, the sponsoring institute's conference coordinator and other identified Program Directors were queried for their knowledge of new conference-specific research initiatives sponsored by their institute. The main outcome measure was the total number of requests for applications, requests for proposals, program announcements, broad agency announcements, notices, and funded investigator-initiated research program grants (RO1s) for a given Consensus topic in the 3 years before (baseline measure) and following (measure of impact) a CDC.

Results: As identified through NIH's IMPAC II and DHHS' CRISP grants and announcements databases, the total number of relevant postconference research initiatives increased for five of six CDCs when compared with baseline activity levels; research activities remained constant for the sixth. When inclusion criteria were restricted to institute-identified research initiatives, two of six CDC topics had overall increases in relevant research activity in the postconference period.

Conclusions: CDCs appear to have a positive impact on the stimulation of related NIH-funded research initiatives. Future outcomes evaluations using prospective data collection methods and more robust participation by sponsoring and cosponsoring institutes should strengthen the reliability of the association between new research initiatives on a given topic and their causal relationship to a given CDC.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

DoksumT, BernhardtBA, HoltzmanNA. 2001Carrier screening for cystic fibrosis among Maryland obstetricians before and after the 1997 NIH Consensus Conference. Genet Test. 5: 111116.

DuX, FreemanDHJr, SyblikDA. 2000What drove changes in the use of breast conserving surgery since the early 1980s? The role of the clinical trial, celebrity action and an NIH consensus statement. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 62: 7179.

FergusonJH. 1993NIH consensus conferences: Dissemination and impact. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 703: 180199.

FergusonJH. 1995The NIH consensus development program. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 21: 332336.

LazovichD, SolomonCC, ThomasDB, et al. 1999Breast conservation therapy in the United States following the 1990 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on the treatment of patients with early stage invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer. 86: 628637.

LazovichD, WhiteE, ThomasDB, et al. 1997Change in the use of breast-conserving surgery in western Washington after the 1990 NIH Consensus Development Conference. Arch Surg. 132: 418423.

NIH OER. Glossary of NIH terms. Available at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/glossary.htm. Accessed 12 December 2006.

NIH OER. Types of grant programs: NIH Research Project Grant Program (R01). Available at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/r01.htm. Accessed 12 December 2006.

No authors listed.1980Pros and cons on NIH consensus conferences. JAMA. 244: 14131414.

PerryS. 1987The NIH Consensus Development Program. A decade later. N Engl J Med. 317: 485488.

PerryS, KalbererJTJr. 1980The NIH consensus-development program and the assessment of health-care technologies: The first two years. N Engl J Med. 303: 169172.

RagnarssonKT. 2006Traumatic brain injury research since the 1998 NIH Consensus Conference: Accomplishments and unmet goals. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 21: 379387.

RichmondJB. Statement before the Submcommittee on Domestic and International Scientific Planning, Analysis, and Cooperation. Congressional Record 124; 1978.

ThamerM, RayNF, HendersonSC, et al. 1998Influence of the NIH Consensus Conference on Helicobacter pylori on physician prescribing among a Medicaid population. Med Care. 36: 646660.

WortmanPM, VinokurA, SechrestL. 1988Do consensus conferences work? A process evaluation of the NIH Consensus Development Program. J Health Polit Policy Law. 13: 469498.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: