Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Econometric Analysis of Variation in Cesarean Section Rates: A Cross-sectional Study of 59 Obstetrical Departments in Sweden

  • Ingemar Eckerlund (a1) and Ulf-G Gerdtham (a2)

The objective of this study was to explain the variation in cesarean section rates among hospitals (obstetrical departments) in Sweden, and to discuss its potential economic consequences. Using data from The Swedish Medical Birth Registry 1991, we made a cross-sectional study of the cesarean section rate at the departmental level. We identified some 20 determinants, demand-related as well as supply-related. A general model including all these regressors was specified. After reducing this model, we were able to explain about one-quarter of the variation. We conclude that the large variation in cesarean section rates indicates inefficiency, due mainly to overutilization, but perhaps also underutilization. It is difficult to calculate the economic consequences or the welfare loss to society. We estimated an additional cost for unnecessary cesarean sections of 13—16 million Swedish crowns (SEK) per year.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

1. J. A. Adashek , A. M. Peaceman , & J. A. Lopec-Zeno , Factors contributing to the increased cesarean birth rate in older parturient women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1993, 169, 936–40.

2. G. M. Anderson , & J. Lomas Determinants of the increasing cesarean birth rate. New England Journal of Medicine, 1984, 311, 887–92.

3. Å. Blomqvist The doctor as double agent: Information asymmetry, health insurance, and medical care. Journal of Health Economics, 1991, 10, 411–22.

4. T. Breusch , & A. Pagan A simple test for heteroskedasticity and random coefficient Variation. Econometrica, 1979, 47, 1287–94.

5. T. J. Broadhead , & D. K. James Worldwide utilization of cesarean section. In B. L. Flamm & E. J. Quilligan (eds.), Cesarean section: Guidelines for appropiate utilization. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1995, 921.

6. H. S. Brown Physician demand for leisure: Implications for cesarean section rates. Journal of Health Economics, 1996, 15, 233–42.

7. L. Clark , M. Mugford , & C. Paterson How does the mode of delivery affect the cost of maternity care? British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1991, 98, 519–23.

10. R. P. Ellis , & T. G. McGuire Provider behaviour under prospective reimbursement. Journal of Health Economics, 1986, 5, 129–51.

11. R. G. Evans The dog in the night: Medical practice variations and health policy. In T. F. Andersen & G. Mooney (eds.), The challenges of medical practice variations. London: Macmillan, 1990.

12. M. D. Finkler , & D. D. Wirtschafter Cost-effectiveness and obstetric services. Medical Care, 1991, 29, 951–63.

13. B. L. Flamm , & E. J. Quilligan (eds). Cesarean section: Guidelines for appropriate utilization. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1995.

14. S. Folland , & M. Stano Sources of small area variations in the use of medical care. Journal of Health Economics 1989, 8, 85107.

15. L. B. Gardner Economic considerations in cesarean section use. In: B. L. Flamm & E. J. Quilligan (eds.), Cesarean section: Guidelines for appropiate utilization. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1995, 173190.

17. G. L. Goyert , S. F. Bottoms , M. C. Treadwell , & P. C. Nehra The physician factor in cesarean birth rates. New England Journal of Medicine, 1989, 320, 706–09.

19. C. M. Jarque , & A. K. Bera A test for normality of observations and regression residuals. International Statistical Review, 1987, 55, 163–72.

20. E. B. Keeler , & M. Brodie Economic incentives in the choice between vaginal delivery and cesarean section. The Milbank Quarterly, 1993, 71, 365–04.

24. L. McCloskey , D. B. Petitti , & C. J. Hobel Variations in the use of cesarean delivery for dystocia: Lessons about the source of care. Medical Care, 1992, 30, 126–35.

26. T. F. Nielsen , P. Otterblad Olausson , & I. Ingemarsson The cesarean section rate in Sweden: The end of the rise. Birth, 1994, 21, 1.

27. F. C. Notzon , P. J. Placek , & S. M. Taffel Comparison of national cesarean-section rates. New England Journal of Medicine, 1987, 316, 386–89.

28. F.C. Notzon , S. Cnattingius , P. Bergsjö , Cesarean section delivery in the 1980’s: International comparison by indication. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1994, 170, 495504.

29. C. E. Phelps Diffusion of information in medical care. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1992, 6, 2342.

30. C. E. Phelps , & C. Mooney Correction and update on ‘Priority Setting in Medical Technology Assessment. Medical Care, 1992, 30, 744–51.

32. C. E. Phelps , & S. T. Parente Priority setting in medical technology and medical practice assessment. Medical Care, 1990, 28, 703–23.

35. R. S. Stafford Cesarean section use and source of payment: An analysis of California hospital discharge abstracts. American Journal of Public Health, 1990, 80, 313–15.

36. R. S. Stafford The impact of nonclinical factors on repeat cesarean section. JAMA, 1991, 265, 5963.

38. A. D. Tussing , & M. A. Wojtowycz The cesarean decision in New York State, 1986: Economic and noneconomic aspects. Medical Care, 1992, 30, 529–40.

39. A. D. Tussing , & M. A. Wojtowycz The effect of physician characteristics on clinical behavior: Cesarean section in New York state. Social Science and Medicine, 1993, 37, 1251–60.

40. J. E. Wennberg Dealing with medical practice variations: A proposal for action. Health Affairs, 1984, 3, 632.

41. J. E. Wennberg , B.A. Barnes , & M. Zubkoff Professional uncertainty and the problem of supplier-induced demand. Social Science and Medicine, 1982, 16, 811–24.

42. G. P. Westert , A. P. Nieboer , & P. P. Groenewegen Variation in duration of hospital stay between hospitals and between doctors within hospitals. Social Science and Medicine, 1993, 37, 833–39.

43. S. C. Zahniser , J. S. Kendrick , A. L. Franks , Trends in obstetric operative procedures, 1980 to 1987. American Journal of Public Health, 1992, 82, 1340–44.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 16 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 58 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.