Skip to main content
×
Home

EXPLORATION AND PREFERENTIAL RANKING OF PATIENT BENEFITS OF MEDICAL DEVICES: A NEW AND GENERIC INSTRUMENT FOR HEALTH ECONOMIC ASSESSMENTS

  • Eva Lesén (a1), Ingela Björholt (a2) (a3) (a4), Anders Ingelgård (a5) (a6) and Fredrik J. Olson (a5)
Abstract

Objectives: For medical devices, benefits other than direct clinical effects may have a large impact on the patients’ well-being, but a standardized method for measuring these benefits is unavailable. The objective was to explore potential patient benefits provided by medical devices, and to assess the relative preferences of these benefits in the general Swedish population.

Methods: To identify attributes of patient benefit, healthcare personnel within a wide range of disease areas were interviewed. The generalized attributes were then validated among healthcare personnel, patient organizations, and manufacturers; in two pilot studies in the general population; and in two rounds of cognitive interviews. The general population's preferences of the attributes were measured with a usability-tested questionnaire in a final responding sample of 3,802 individuals, representative of the Swedish population.

Results: Twenty attributes were identified, encompassing aspects of integrity, sense of security, social participation, and convenience. When measuring the relative preferences, the response rate was 37.0 percent, and the results showed that the attributes with the highest preferences concerned reliability, reduced need for assistance, and sense of control of the illness/disability.

Conclusions: A set of twenty attributes of patient benefit relevant to users of medical devices was identified and validated. A questionnaire for patient-reported assessment of the benefits provided by a medical device was developed, based on the attributes. The questionnaire, designated MedTech20, provides a generic measurement method for the evaluation of medical devices used in a wide range of diseases/disabilities.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      EXPLORATION AND PREFERENTIAL RANKING OF PATIENT BENEFITS OF MEDICAL DEVICES: A NEW AND GENERIC INSTRUMENT FOR HEALTH ECONOMIC ASSESSMENTS
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      EXPLORATION AND PREFERENTIAL RANKING OF PATIENT BENEFITS OF MEDICAL DEVICES: A NEW AND GENERIC INSTRUMENT FOR HEALTH ECONOMIC ASSESSMENTS
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      EXPLORATION AND PREFERENTIAL RANKING OF PATIENT BENEFITS OF MEDICAL DEVICES: A NEW AND GENERIC INSTRUMENT FOR HEALTH ECONOMIC ASSESSMENTS
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
References
Hide All
1. European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Council Directive 2007/47/EC of 5 September 2007 amending Council Directive 93/42/EEC concerning medical devices. 2007.
2. Sorenson C, Drummond M. Improving medical device regulation: The United States and Europe in perspective. Milbank Q. 2014;92:114150.
3. Blixt M, Södergård B, Hiort S, et al. Hälsoekonomiska utvärderingar av medicintekniska produkter - Slutrapport (report in Swedish) [Health economic evaluations of medical devices]. Tandvårds- och läkemedelsförmånsverket [Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits Agency]. 2015.
4. Vårdanalys [Swedish Agency for Health and Care Services Analysis]. Mot en mer effektiv och jämlik användning av medicinteknik - om nyttan med hälsoekonomiska bedömningar av medicinteknik (Report in Swedish) [Towards a more effective and equal use of medical devices - on the benefit of health economic evaluations of medical devices]. 2015.
5. Ijzerman MJ, Steuten LM. Early assessment of medical technologies to inform product development and market access: A review of methods and applications. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011;9:331347.
6. Vallejo-Torres L, Steuten LM, Buxton MJ, et al. Integrating health economics modeling in the product development cycle of medical devices: A Bayesian approach. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24:459464.
7. Girling A, Young T, Brown C, et al. Early-stage valuation of medical devices: The role of developmental uncertainty. Value Health. 2010;13:585591.
8. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Medical technologies evaluation programme - Methods guide. 2011. London: NICE.
9. Leidy NK, Beusterien K, Sullivan E, et al. Integrating the patient's perspective into device evaluation trials. Value Health. 2006;9:394401.
10. EuroQol Group. EuroQol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16:199208.
11. Canova C, Giorato E, Roveron G, et al. Validation of a stoma-specific quality of life questionnaire in a sample of patients with colostomy or ileostomy. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15:e692–e698.
12. Pinder B, Lloyd AJ, Elwick H, et al. Development and psychometric validation of the intermittent self-catheterization questionnaire. Clin Ther. 2012;34:23022313.
13. Watkins K, Connell CM. Measurement of health-related QOL in diabetes mellitus. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22:11091126.
14. Beatty PC, Willis GB. Research synthesis: The practice of cognitive interviewing. Public Opin Q. 2007;71:287311.
15. Statistics Sweden. Befolkningsstatistik [Population statistics]. http://www.scb.se/be0101/ (accessed October 5, 2015).
16. Statistics Sweden. The statistical database - Population statistics. http://www.statistikdatabasen.scb.se/ (accessed January 5, 2016).
17. Statistics Sweden. Undersökningarna av levnadsförhållanden (ULF) [the Swedish Living Conditions Surveys]. http://www.scb.se/le0101-en (accessed January 5, 2016).
18. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care. 1997;35:10951108.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 33
Total number of PDF views: 113 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 257 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 25th October 2017 - 25th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.