1. Abma, T. Patient participation in health research: Research with and for people with spinal cord injuries. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1310–1328.
2. Begg, C, Cho, M, Eastwood, S, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA. 1996;276:637–639.
3. Boote, J, Telford, R, Cooper, C. Consumer involvement in health research: A review and research agenda. Health Policy. 2002;61:213–236.
4. Brett, J, Staniszewska, S, Mockford, C et al. , The PIRICOM Study: A systematic review of the conceptualisation, measurement, impact and outcomes of patient and public involvement in health and social care research. London: United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration; 2009.
5. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York: CRD, University of York; 2009.
6. Coupland, H, Maher, L, Enriquez, J, et al. Clients or colleagues? Reflections on the process of participatory action research with young injecting drug users. Int J Drug Policy. 2005;16:191–198.
8. Facey, K, Boivin, A, Gracia, J, Hansen, HP, Lo Scalzo, A, et al. Patients’ perspectives in health technology assessment: A route to robust evidence and fair deliberation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010;26:334–340.
9. Gagnon, M, Desmartis, M, Lepage-Savary, D, et al. Introducing patients’ and the public's perspectives to health technology assessment: A systematic review of international experiences. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27:31–42.
10. Gauvin, F, Abelson, J, Giacomini, M, et al. Moving cautiously: Public involvement and the health technology assessment community. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27:43–49.
13. Makela, M, Stein, K. Mind sharpeners for scientists. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27:99–100.
14. McKenzie, A, Hanley, B. Consumer and community participation in health and medical research. Perth, Western Australia: University of Western Australia; 2007.
15. Mockford, C, Staniszewska, S, Griffiths, F et al. The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS healthcare. International Journal of Quality in Healthcare. In press.
16. Moher, D, Hopewell, S, Schultz, K. Consort 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c723.
17. Moher, D, Schulz, KF, Altman, DG. The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet. 2001;357:1191–1194.
18. National Institutes of Health [WWW document]. URL http://copr.nih.gov/ (accessed April 1, 2011).
20. Shea, B, Santesso, N, Qualman, A, et al. Cochrane Musculoskeletal Consumer Group. Consumer-driven health care: Building partnerships in research. Health Expect. 2005;8/4:352–359.
21. Staley, K. Exploring impact: Public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. Eastleigh: INVOLVE; 2009.
22. Staniszewska, S, et al. Developing the evidence base of patient and public involvement in health and social care research: The case for measuring impact. Int J Consum Stud. 2011. in press.
23. Streiner, DL, Norman, GR. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications; 2005.
25. Ware, JE, Sherbourne, CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36®): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–483.
26. Wright, D, Foster, C, Amir, Z, Elliott, J, Wilson, R. Critical appraisal guidelines for assessing the quality and impact of user involvement in research. Health Expect. 2010;13:359–368.