Skip to main content
×
Home

Health technology assessment–based development of a Spanish breast cancer patient decision aid

  • Fátima Izquierdo (a1), Javier Gracia (a1), Mercedes Guerra (a1), Juan Antonio Blasco (a1) and Elena Andradas (a1)...
Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop a breast cancer Patient Decision Aid (PDA), using a Health Technology Assessment (HTA) process, to assist patients in their choice of therapeutic options, and to promote shared decision making among patients, healthcare professionals, and other interested parties.

Methods: A systematic review (SR) was conducted of existing breast cancer patient Decision Aids encountered in the main scientific journal databases and on institutional Web sites that create PDAs, together with a Qualitative Research (QR) study, using semi-structured interviews and focus group with stakeholders (patients, family members, and health professionals), with the aim of developing a PDA for breast cancer.

Results: The SR shows that PDAs in breast cancer not only increase patient knowledge of the illness, leading to more realistic expectations of treatment outcomes, but also reduce passivity in the decision-making process and facilitate the appropriate choice of treatment options in accordance with patient medical and personal preferences. The analysis of QR shows that both breast cancer patients and healthcare professionals agree that surgery, adjuvant treatments, and breast reconstruction represent the most important decisions to be made. Worry, anxiety, optimism, and trust in healthcare professionals were determined as factors that most affected patients subjective experiences of the illness. This HTA was used as the basis for developing a PDA software program.

Conclusions: The SR and QR used in the development of this PDA for breast cancer allowed patients to access information, gain additional knowledge of their illness, make shared treatment decisions, and gave healthcare professionals a deeper insight into patient experiences of the disease.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Health technology assessment–based development of a Spanish breast cancer patient decision aid
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Health technology assessment–based development of a Spanish breast cancer patient decision aid
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Health technology assessment–based development of a Spanish breast cancer patient decision aid
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
1. Early and locally advanced breast cancer: Diagnosis and treatment. NICE. National Collaborating Centre for Cancer; 2009.
2. Edwards A, Elwyn G. Shared decision-making in health care. Achieving evidence based patient choice. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2009.
3. Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey E, et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: Online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ. 2006;333:417.
4. Facey K, Boivin A, Gracia J, et al. Patients’ perspectives in health technology assessment: A route to robust evidence and fair deliberation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010;26:334340.
5. Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ. Users’ guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1993;270:25982601.
6. Jacobsen MJ, O'Connor AM. Population needs assessment. A workbook for assessing patients' and practitioners' decision making needs. Canada: University of Ottawa; 2006.
7. Lacey MD. The experience of using Decisional Support Aids by patients with breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2002;29:14911497.
8. Molenaar S, Sprangers MA, Rutgers EJ et al. Decision support for patients with early-stage breast cancer: Effects of an interactive breast cancer CDROM on treatment decision, satisfaction, and quality of life. J. Clin. Oncol. 2001;19:16761687.
9. Morris D, Drake E, Saarimaki A, Bennett C, O'Connor A. Can people find patient decision aids on the Internet? Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73:557560.
10. O'Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995;15:2530.
11. O'Connor AM, Bennett CL, Stacey D et al. , Ayudas para personas que deben decidir sobre tratamientos o sobre la participación en pruebas de detección (Revision Cochrane traducida). Biblioteca Cochrane Plus; 2009 Número 3. Oxford: Update Software Ltd. (Traducida de The Cochrane Library, 2009 Issue 3 Art no. CD001431. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
12. O'Connor AM, Drake ER, Fiset V, Graham ID, Laupacis A, Tugwell P. The Ottawa patient decision aids. Eff Clin Pract. 1999;2:163170.
13. O'Connor AM, Jacobsen MJ. Workbook on developing and evaluating patient decision aids. Canada: Ottawa Health Research Institute; 2003. www.ohri.ca/decisionaid (accessed May 10, 2009).
14. OncoGuía de mama. Cataluña, España: Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnología e Investigaciones Médicas de Cataluña (AATRM); 2008.
15. Oxman AD, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH. User's guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. JAMA. 1994;272:13671371.
16. Pearson A. Balancing the evidence: Incorporating the synthesis of qualitative data into systematic reviews. JBI Rep. 2004;2:4564.
17. Salganik MJ, Heckathorn DD. Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent-driven sampling. Sociol Methodol. 2004;34:193239.
18. Sing.ac.uk [Internet]. Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). http://www.sign.ac.uk. (accessed March 25, 2009).
19. Stacey D. Decision making in oncology: A review of patient decision aids to support patient participation. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:293304.
20. Street RL Jr, Voigt B, Geyer C Jr, Manning T, Swanson GP. Increasing patient involvement in choosing treatment for early breast cancer. Cancer. 1995:76:22752285.
21. The AGREE Collaboration. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) Instrument. London, UK: 2001. www.agreecollaboration.org (accessed March 30, 2009).
22. Valles MS. Entrevistas cualitativas. Colección Cuadernos Metodológicos, NÚM. 32. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas; 2009.
23. Whelan T, Sawka C, Levine M, et al. Helping patients make informed choices: A randomized trial of a decision aid for adjuvant chemotherapy in lymph node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:581587.
24. Whelan T, Levine M, Willan A, et al. Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery. A randomized trial. JAMA. 2004;292:435441.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 109 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 125 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.