Skip to main content Accessibility help


  • Guy Paré (a1), Placide Poba-Nzaou (a2) and Claude Sicotte (a3)


Objectives: There have been very few assessments of the economics of home telemonitoring, and the quality of evidence has often been weakened by methodological flaws. This has made it difficult to compare telehomecare with traditional home care for the chronic diseases studied. This economic analysis is an attempt to address this gap in the literature.

Methods: We have analyzed the consumption of healthcare services by 95 patients with various chronic diseases over a 21-month period, that is, 12 months before, 4 months during home telemonitoring use, and over 5 months after withdraw of the technology.

Results: Our findings indicate significant benefits to the home telemonitoring program as evidenced by large reductions in number of hospitalizations, length of average hospital stay, and, to a lesser extent, number of emergency room visits. Contrary to expectations, however, the number of home visits by nurses increased both during and after the telemonitoring intervention. In terms of the financial analysis, the telehomecare program resulted in significant savings: the equivalent of over CAD1,557 per patient as calculated on an annualized basis. This represents a net gain of 41 percent as compared to traditional home care.

Conclusions: While the present economic analysis led to positive results, additional assessments should be conducted to confirm the cost-effectiveness of this mode of care delivery.



Hide All
1.World Health Organization. Home care in Europe. 2008. E91884.pdf (accessed June 29, 2012).
2.Quebec Health & Social Services Ministry. Chez soi: le premier choix. La politique de soutien à domicile. 2003. (accessed June 29, 2012).
3.Canadian Home Care Association. Home is best™: Developing an integrated primary and home & community care system. 2012. (accessed June 29, 2012).
4.Canada Health Infoway. Toward critical mass: Moving from availability to adoption (title of 2010-2011 annual report). 2011. annual-reports (accessed June 29, 2012).
5.Canada Health Infoway. Telehealth benefits and adoption: Connecting people and providers across Canada. 2011. (accessed June 29, 2012).
6.Roine, R, Ohinmaa, A, Hailey, D. Assessing telemedicine: A systematic review of the literature. Can Med Assoc J. 2001;165:765771.
7.Paré, G, Moqadem, K, Pineau, G, St-Hilaire, C. Clinical effectiveness of home telemonitoring programs in the context of diabetes, asthma, heart failure and hypertension: A systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12:e21.
8.Dang, S, Dimmick, S, Kelkar, G. Evaluating the evidence base for the use of home telehealth remote monitoring in elderly with heart failure. Telemed J E Health. 2009;15:783796.
9.Polinesa, J, Tran, K, Cimon, K, et al.Home telehealth for diabetes management: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009;11:913930.
10.Paré, G, Jaana, M, Sicotte, C. Systematic review of home telemonitoring for chronic diseases: The evidence base. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14:269277.
11.Maric, B, Kaan, A, Ignaszewski, A, Lear, SA. A systematic review of telemonitoring technologies in heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2009;11:506517.
12.Clarke, M, Shah, A, Sharma, U. Systematic review of studies on telemonitoring of patients with congestive heart failure: A meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17:714.
13.Seto, E. Cost comparison between telemonitoring and usual care of heart failure: A systematic review. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14:679686.
14.Polinesa, J, Coyle, D, Coyle, K, McGill, S. Home telehealth for chronic disease management: Systematic review and an analysis of economic evaluations. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25:339349.
15.Klersy, C, De Silvestri, A, Gabutti, G, et al.A meta-analysis of remote monitoring of heart failure patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:16831694.
16.Polinesa, J, Tran, K, Cimon, K, et al.Home telemonitoring for congestive heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16:6876.
17.Polinesa, J, Tran, K, Cimon, K, et al.Home telehealth for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16:120127.
18.Miller, RB, Hollist, CS. Attrition bias. In: Salkind N, ed. Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics. Thousand Oaks: Sage Reference; 2007:5760.
19.Drummond, MF, O'Brien, B, Stoddart, GL, Torrance, GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 2nd ed.Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications; 1997.
20.Johnson, B, Wheeler, L, Deuser, J, Sousa, KH. Outcomes of the Kaiser Permanente telehome health research project. Arch Fam Med. 2009;9:4045.
21.Jerant, AF, Azari, R, Nesbitt, TS. Reducing the cost of frequent hospital admissions for congestive heart failure. Med Care. 2001;39:12341245.
22.Lehmann, CA, Mintz, N, Giacini, JM. Impact of telehealth on healthcare utilization by congestive heart failure patients. Dis Manage Health Outcomes, 2006;14:163169.


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Paré et al supplementary material
Supplementary table 1

 Word (54 KB)
54 KB
Supplementary materials

Paré et al supplementary material
Supplementary table2

 Word (34 KB)
34 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed