Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 7
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Creutzberg, Carien L 2016. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for radiation-induced injury: evidence is needed. The Lancet Oncology, Vol. 17, Issue. 2, p. 132.

    Hoggan, Benjamin L. and Cameron, Alun L. 2014. Systematic review of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for the treatment of non-neurological soft tissue radiation-related injuries. Supportive Care in Cancer, Vol. 22, Issue. 6, p. 1715.

    Standley, Thomas DA and Wheeler, Daniel W 2012. Ward's Anaesthetic Equipment.

    Chuck, Anderson W. Hailey, David Jacobs, Philip and Perry, Douglas C. 2008. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy for diabetic foot ulcers. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Vol. 24, Issue. 02, p. 178.

    Barnes, Robert C. 2006. Point: Hyperbaric Oxygen Is Beneficial for Diabetic Foot Wounds. Clinical Infectious Diseases, Vol. 43, Issue. 2, p. 188.

    Herman, Patricia M Craig, Benjamin M and Caspi, Opher 2005. Is complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) cost-effective? a systematic review. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Vol. 5, Issue. 1,

    Horowitz, Sala 2004. Expanding Clinical Applications of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy. Alternative and Complementary Therapies, Vol. 10, Issue. 2, p. 78.

  • International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Volume 19, Issue 2
  • April 2003, pp. 339-346


  • Shien Guo (a1), Michael A. Counte (a1) and James C. Romeis (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 April 2003

Objectives: To examine the growing evidence and the consensus in the medical community concerning the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO2T) and to suggest future research areas to ensure the appropriate use of this technology.

Methods: A literature search of articles published between 1985 and 2000 was conducted using PubMed to describe the growth of HBO2T-related articles published over the past fifteen years. In addition, articles involving the qualitative synthesis of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of HBO2T in thirteen major application areas were identified and compared with the changing view of the medical community toward the evidence of HBO2T.

Results: The total number of HBO2T-related articles published annually has steadily increased over the past fifteen years. This increase has gradually contributed to a consensus in the medical community concerning the evidence of efficacy in its major application areas. However, information regarding the cost-effectiveness of HBO2T is still extremely limited.

Conclusions: Although evidence concerning the efficacy of HBO2T has been growing in the past, more evidence is still needed for some of its major application areas. Moreover, there is an urgent need to shift part of the research focus on HBO2T to its cost-effectiveness to provide decision makers with relevant information to evaluate this technology objectively.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *