Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Syurina, Elena V Schulte in den Bäumen, Tobias Brand, Angela Ambrosino, Elena and Feron, Frans JM 2013. Concepts for the translation of genome-based innovations into public health: a comprehensive overview. Personalized Medicine, Vol. 10, Issue. 2, p. 163.

    Serenko, Natalia 2012. Disruptive Technologies, Innovation and Global Redesign.

    Avard, Denise and Harmsen, Eef 2010. Encyclopedia of Life Sciences.

  • International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Volume 20, Issue 2
  • April 2004, pp. 106-114

Improving population health or the population itself? Health technology assessment and our genetic future

  • Ken Bassett (a1), Patricia M. Lee (a2), Carolyn J. Green (a1), Lisa Mitchell (a3) and Arminée Kazanjian (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 April 2004

The province of British Columbia (BC), Canada is developing its first population-wide prenatal genetic screening program, known as triple-marker screening (TMS). TMS, initiated with a simple blood test, is most commonly used to screen for fetuses with the chromosomal abnormality known as Down syndrome or neural tube disorders. Women testing TMS-positive are offered diagnostic amniocentesis and, if the diagnosis is confirmed, selective second-trimester abortion. The project described in this study was initiated to address the broad range of issues arising from this testing technology and provides an example of the new type of health technology assessment (HTA) contribution emerging (and likely to become increasing necessary) in health policy development. With the advent of prenatal genetic screening programs, would-be parents gain the promise of identifying target conditions and, hence, the option of selective abortion of affected fetuses. There is considerable awareness that these developments pose challenges in every dimension (ethical, political, economic, and clinical) of the health-care environment. In the effort to construct an appropriate prenatal screening policy, therefore, administrators have understandably sought guidance from within the field of HTA. The report authors concluded that, within the restricted path open to it, the role of government is relatively clear. It has the responsibility to maintain equal access to prenatal testing, as to any other health service. It should also require maintenance of medical standards and evaluation of program performance. At the same time, policy-makers need actively to support those individuals born with disabilities and their families.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *