Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

PERFORMANCE OF OVID MEDLINE SEARCH FILTERS TO IDENTIFY HEALTH STATE UTILITY STUDIES

  • Mick Arber (a1), Sonia Garcia (a2), Thomas Veale (a2), Mary Edwards (a2), Alison Shaw (a2) and Julie M. Glanville (a2)...
Abstract

Objectives: This study was designed to assess the sensitivity of three Ovid MEDLINE search filters developed to identify studies reporting health state utility values (HSUVs), to improve the performance of the best performing filter, and to validate resulting search filters.

Methods: Three quasi-gold standard sets (QGS1, QGS2, QGS3) of relevant studies were harvested from reviews of studies reporting HSUVs. The performance of three initial filters was assessed by measuring their relative recall of studies in QGS1. The best performing filter was then developed further using QGS2. This resulted in three final search filters (FSF1, FSF2, and FSF3), which were validated using QGS3.

Results: FSF1 (sensitivity maximizing) retrieved 132/139 records (sensitivity: 95 percent) in the QGS3 validation set. FSF1 had a number needed to read (NNR) of 842. FSF2 (balancing sensitivity and precision) retrieved 128/139 records (sensitivity: 92 percent) with a NNR of 502. FSF3 (precision maximizing) retrieved 123/139 records (sensitivity: 88 percent) with a NNR of 383.

Conclusions: We have developed and validated a search filter (FSF1) to identify studies reporting HSUVs with high sensitivity (95 percent) and two other search filters (FSF2 and FSF3) with reasonably high sensitivity (92 percent and 88 percent) but greater precision, resulting in a lower NNR. These seem to be the first validated filters available for HSUVs. The availability of filters with a range of sensitivity and precision options enables researchers to choose the filter which is most appropriate to the resources available for their specific research.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      PERFORMANCE OF OVID MEDLINE SEARCH FILTERS TO IDENTIFY HEALTH STATE UTILITY STUDIES
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      PERFORMANCE OF OVID MEDLINE SEARCH FILTERS TO IDENTIFY HEALTH STATE UTILITY STUDIES
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      PERFORMANCE OF OVID MEDLINE SEARCH FILTERS TO IDENTIFY HEALTH STATE UTILITY STUDIES
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
1. Phillips, C, Thompson, G. What is a QALY? [What is. . .? series, Second edition, supported by Sanofi-Aventis]. Newmarket: Hayward Medical Communications, 2009 http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/painres/download/whatis/qaly.pdf (accessed June 16, 2016).
2. Tolley, K. What are health utilities? [What is. . .? series, Second edition, supported by Sanofi-Aventis]. Newmarket: Hayward Medical Communications, 2009 http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/painres/download/whatis/Health-util.pdf (accessed June 16, 2016).
3. The University of Sheffield, National Institute for Health Research. ScHARRHUD [database]. Sheffield: School of Health and Related Research; 2016. http://www.scharrhud.org/ (accessed June 16, 2016).
4. The Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health. CEA: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry [database]. Boston, MA: Tufts Medical Center; 2016. https://research.tufts-nemc.org/cear4/ (accessed June 16, 2016).
5. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. NHS EED [database]. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; 2016. http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/CRDWeb/ (accessed June 16, 2016).
6. Papaioannou, D, Brazier, J, Paisley, S. NICE DSU technical support document 9: The identification, review and synthesis of health state utility values from the literature. report by the decision support unit. Sheffield: School of Health and Related Research, 2010. http://www.nicedsu.org.uk/TSD9%20HSUV%20values_FINAL.pdf (accessed June 16, 2016).
7. Paisley, S. Identification of evidence for key parameters in decision-analytic models of cost effectiveness: A description of sources and a recommended minimum search requirement. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34:597608.
8. Papaioannou, D, Brazier, J, Paisley, S. Systematic searching and selection of health state utility values from the literature. Value Health. 2013;16:686695.
9. Glanville, J, Lefebvre, C, Wright, K. ISSG search filters resource [webpage]. York: InterTASC Information Specialists' Sub-Group (ISSG); 2016. https://sites.google.com/a/york.ac.uk/issg-search-filters-resource/home (accessed June 16, 2016).
10. Filters, Flinders. Flinders filters: Research solutions to searching problems [webpage]. Adelaide: Flinders Centre for Clinical Change & Health Care Research; 2016. http://www.flinders.edu.au/clinical-change/research/flinders-filters/ (accessed June 16, 2016).
11. McMaster Health Knowledge Refinery (HKR) Projects. Hedges Project [webpage]. Hamilton: Health Information Research Unit, McMaster University; 2016. http://hiru.mcmaster.ca/hiru/HIRU_Hedges_home.aspx (accessed June 16, 2016).
12. Urbaniak, GC, Plous, S. Research Randomizer [Version 4.0] [Computer software]. 2013. https://www.randomizer.org (accessed June 16, 2016).
13. PubReMiner, Koster J. [webpage]. 2014. http://hgserver2.amc.nl/cgi-bin/miner/miner2.cgi (accessed June 16, 2016).
14. The National Centre for Text Mining. TerMine [webpage]. Manchester: University of Manchester; 2014. http://www.nactem.ac.uk/software/termine/ (accessed June 16, 2016).
15. Glanville, JM, Lefebvre, C, Miles, JN, Camosso-Stefinovic, J. How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: Ten years on [Erratum: J Med Libr Assoc. 2006;94:354]. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006;94:130136.
16. Jenkins, M. Evaluation of methodological search filters–a review. Health Info Libr J. 2004;21:148163.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Arber et al supplementary material
Tables S1-S5

 Word (28 KB)
28 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed