Skip to main content
×
×
Home

PERSPECTIVE: SOME CONCLUSIONS FROM MY LIFE IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

  • H. David Banta (a1)
Abstract

I have worked in health technology assessment (HTA) since 1975, beginning in the United States Congress Office of Technology Assessment (OTA), where we were charged with defining “medical technology assessment”. My main concern in HTA has always been efficacy of healthcare interventions. After years in OTA, I was invited to the Netherlands in 1985, where the Dutch government invited me to head a special commission concerning future healthcare technology and HTA. From there, I became involved in over forty countries, beginning in Europe and then throughout the world. My most intense involvements, outside the United States and Europe, have been in Brazil, China, and Malaysia. During these 40-plus years, I have seen HTA grow from its earliest beginnings to a worldwide force for better health care for everyone. I have also had some growing concerns, outlined in this Perspective article. Within HTA, I am most disappointed by a narrow perspective of cost-effective analysis, which tends to ignore considerations of culture, society, ethics, and organizational and legal issues. In the general environment affecting HTA and health care, I am most concerned about the need to protect the independence of HTA activities from influences of the healthcare industries.

Copyright
References
Hide All
1.Ruffin, J, Grizzle, J, Hightower, N, et al. cooperative double-blond evaluation of gastric freezing in the treatment of duodenal ulcer. N Engl J Med. 1969;281:1619.
2.Cochrane, A. Effectiveness and efficiency. London; The Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust; 1972.
3.Office of Technology Assessment. Development of medical technology, opportunities for assessment. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1976.
4.Office of Technology Assessment. The implications of cost effectiveness analysis of medical technology. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1980.
5.Office of Technology Assessment. Strategies for medical technology assessment. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1982.
6.Office of Technology Assessment. Assessing the efficacy and safety of medical technologies. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1982.
7.Office of Technology Assessment. Policy implications of the computed tomography (CT) scanner. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1978.
8.Banta, D, Thacker, S. Assessing the costs and benefits of electronic fetal monitoring. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1979;514:627642.
9.Banta, D, Thacker, S. Electronic fetal monitoring, lessons from a formative case of health technology assessment. Int J Health Care Technol Assess. 2002;18:762770.
10.Banta, D, Gelijns, A. Anticipating and assessing health care technology. Dordrecht: Martinis Nijhoff Publishers; 1987.
11.Banta, HD, Werkö, L, Cranovski, R, et al. Report from the EUR-ASSESS Project. Int J Health Care Technol Assess. 1997;13:133340.
12.Integrate-HTA. Guidance for assessing effectiveness, economic aspects, ethical aspects, socio-cultural aspects and legal aspects in complex technologies. http://www.integrate-hta.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/IPP_Guidance-INTEGRATE-HTA_Nr.3_FINAL.pdf (accessed April 2017).
13.EUnetHTA. HTA core model. http://www.eunethta.eu/hta-core-model (accessed April 2017).
14.’t Hoen, E. Private patents and public health. Diemen, the Netherlands: AMB Press; 2017.
15.Wild, C, Kirk, R, Perleth, M, et al. Open letter to the HTAi Board, 2014.
16.Wheaton, S, Paun, C. Brussels gets into drug business. Politico. https://www.politico.eu/article/brussels-to-find-out-how-much-it-can-do-on-drug-pricing/ (accessed January 17, 2018).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed