Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T12:56:29.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reassessment of the CAGE questionnaire by ROC/Taguchi methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2004

Mehmet Tolga Taner  and
Jiju Antony
Mehmet Tolga Taner
Affiliation:
Bogazici University
Jiju Antony
Affiliation:
Glasgow Caledonian University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: The clinical assessment efficiency of the CAGE questionnaire for alcohol abuse based on diagnostic accuracy has not been fully established to date because of the varied and inconclusive gold standards used as diagnostic criteria. CAGE has also been highlighted to miss almost half of the risk-drinkers due to the use of inadequetly set criteria for the positive recognition of alcohol abuse. This study aims to establish the diagnostic accuracy of CAGE at different treatment settings.

Methods: A hybrid of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and the Taguchi method was used, as this approach proved to evaluate the diagnostic performance and accuracy in hypothetical clinical settings. Data were used from three cross-clinical treatment settings, i.e., general medicine outpatients, medical inpatients, and psychiatric inpatients, and analyzed by means of a step-wise application of managable number of statistical indices such as the area under the ROC curve (AUC), leveling factor (p′), and signal-to-noise ratios (S/N; standardized S/N [SS/N]).

Results: The selected settings yielded similar AUCs but portrayed different trade-offs on the ROC curves signaling the presence of different critical CAGE scores. Analysis of the sensitivity and specificity data of i, ii, iii by p′, S/N, SS/N and their dependent relation resulted in the critical CAGE scores of 1,1, and 2; and high diagnostic accuracy levels of 76.84 percent, 86 percent, and 76.84 percent, respectively.

Conclusions: By setting these critical CAGE scores as the minimum detection levels of alcohol abuse, early intervention before the onset of serious alcohol-related problems is possible. This will decrease the health-care costs of the patient and, in addition, reduce the psychological and social burdens inherent to alcohol abuse both on the patient and society. Having its critical scores reliably identified and diagnostic accuracy fully determined, CAGE can now improve the detection rate of problem drinking individuals substantially.

Keywords

Alcohol abuseCAGE questionnaireDiagnostic accuracyTaguchi methodROC curves
Type
RESEARCH REPORT
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , April 2004 , pp. 242 - 246
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buchsbaum DG, Buchanan RG, Centor RM, et al. 1991; Screening for alcohol abuse using CAGE scores and likelihood ratios. Ann Intern Med. 115: 774– 777.Google Scholar
Buchsbaum DG, Buchanan RG, Welsh J, et al. 1992; Screening for drinking disorders in the elderly using the CAGE questionnaire. J Am Geriatr Soc. 40:662– 665.Google Scholar
Bush B, Shaw S, Cleary P, et al. 1987; Screening for alcohol abuse using the CAGE questionnaire. Am J Med. 82: 231– 235.Google Scholar
Ewing JA, Rouse BA. 1970. Identifying the hidden alcoholic. 29th International Congress on Alcohol and Drug Dependence, Sydney, Australia;
Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. 1982 The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve. Radiology. 143: 29 -36.Google Scholar
Mayfield D, McLeod G, Hall P. 1974; The CAGE questionnaire: Validation of a new alcoholism screening instrument. Am J Psychiatry. 131: 1121– 1123.Google Scholar
Murray M, McMillan C. 1993; Problem drinking in Northern Ireland: Results of a community survey using the CAGE questionnaire. Alcohol Alcohol. 28: 477– 483.Google Scholar
Nystrom M, Perasalo J, Salaspuro M. 1993; Screening for heavy drinking and alcohol-related problems in university students: CAGE questionnaire. J Stud Alcohol. 54: 528– 533.Google Scholar
Taner T, Antony J. 2000; The assessment of quality in medical diagnostic tests: A comparison of ROC/Youden and Taguchi methods. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 13: 300– 307.Google Scholar
Taner T, Güvenis A. 2001. Analysis of cut-off points for the CAGE questionnaire for alcohol abuse. 23rd Annual Internationl Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.